Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

English: Obdurate vs Obstinate vs Adamant

 Language Learning Forum : Questions About Your Target Languages Post Reply
Gemuse
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4027 days ago

818 posts - 1189 votes 
Speaks: English
Studies: German

 
 Message 1 of 6
20 February 2014 at 5:31pm | IP Logged 
What is the difference between these words?

The impression that I have is that they have different connotations:

Obdurate: A bad quality/intention connotation
Obstinate: A stupidity connotation: an obstinate person is holding on to his views even
when faced with contradicting evidence.
Adamant: Neutral connotation: an adamant person may or may not be right regarding the
matter at hand. We only know he is being adamant.


Am I mistaken?

Also, what is the difference between Exigency and Emergency?

Edited by Gemuse on 20 February 2014 at 6:14pm

1 person has voted this message useful



osoymar
Tetraglot
Pro Member
United States
Joined 4681 days ago

190 posts - 344 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Portuguese, Japanese
Studies: Spanish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 2 of 6
20 February 2014 at 6:27pm | IP Logged 
In the U.S., at least, obstinate is more common than obdurate, and stubborn is more
common yet. In practice I think they're used in the same way.

While obdurate/obstinate/stubborn are descriptors of personality, adamant is not
something you would use to describe a person's personality in general. A person can be
adamant about his position or he can speak adamantly but he can not BE adamant.

Exigency, again, is extremely rare in day to day English. I would guess that 98% of
Americans don't even know the word passively and I can't recall the last time I heard or
read it. Emergency, of course, is very common.
1 person has voted this message useful



patrickwilken
Senior Member
Germany
radiant-flux.net
Joined 4478 days ago

1546 posts - 3200 votes 
Studies: German

 
 Message 3 of 6
20 February 2014 at 8:04pm | IP Logged 
Gemuse wrote:
What is the difference between these words?

The impression that I have is that they have different connotations:

Obdurate: A bad quality/intention connotation
Obstinate: A stupidity connotation: an obstinate person is holding on to his views even
when faced with contradicting evidence.
Adamant: Neutral connotation: an adamant person may or may not be right regarding the
matter at hand. We only know he is being adamant.


Obdurate: This is very low frequency, and I wouldn't worry about it. I get the impression of stubborn with a 'stony/hard/undissolvable' aspect to it.

Obstinate: Stubborn - even in the face of reasonable evidence.

Adamant: Certain about something, but not necessary unreasonable.


Gemuse wrote:

Also, what is the difference between Exigency and Emergency?


Exigency: Don't know this word - so not something I would worry about.
1 person has voted this message useful



michaelyus
Diglot
Groupie
United Kingdom
Joined 4510 days ago

53 posts - 87 votes 
Speaks: Mandarin, English*
Studies: Italian, French, Cantonese, Korean, Catalan, Vietnamese, Lingala, Spanish
Studies: Hokkien

 
 Message 4 of 6
21 February 2014 at 10:58am | IP Logged 
Exigency is used rather sparingly nowadays, usually in the plural. I'm not sure I'd
compare it to "emergencies": it's closer in meaning to "urgent needs" or "demands" or
"requirements", and can be used of situations of many kinds, including personal, social,
and national, from religious to financial.

The use of the adjective "exigent" is mainly restricted to legal matters (e.g. "exigent
circumstances"). Much much less common than "exigency/-ies". The other adjective
"exiguous" I have to admit I'd never seen before.
1 person has voted this message useful



Fuenf_Katzen
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
notjustajd.wordpress
Joined 4314 days ago

337 posts - 476 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Polish, Ukrainian, Afrikaans

 
 Message 5 of 6
21 February 2014 at 4:40pm | IP Logged 
"Exigent" tends to be used more in discussing a political issue or in a legal matter, and it seems to occur more frequently in writing than in speech.
1 person has voted this message useful



luke
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7150 days ago

3133 posts - 4351 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Esperanto, French

 
 Message 6 of 6
22 February 2014 at 10:30am | IP Logged 
"Exigencies" is used several times in the Federalist Papers.


1 person has voted this message useful



If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2969 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.