Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Russian is past, Chinese is future?

 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
150 messages over 19 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14 ... 18 19 Next >>
victor
Tetraglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 7304 days ago

1098 posts - 1056 votes 
6 sounds
Speaks: Cantonese*, English, FrenchC1, Mandarin
Studies: Spanish
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 105 of 150
30 July 2006 at 6:42pm | IP Logged 
frenkeld wrote:
I've heard, of course, about their technological achievements (paper, gunpowder, rocketry, compass(?), etc.), and a bit about the astronomical ones..


Yes, the Chinese did invent the compass. I hate being the "China invented everything first" freak, but other inventions also include the movable type, which appeared about two centuries before Gutenberg's printing press. And this was a character system we're talking about.
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6754 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 106 of 150
30 July 2006 at 10:29pm | IP Logged 
Mathematics

Quote:
I've heard quite a few conflicting claims about the invention of the
decimal system - could you recommend a book to read up on the history
of Chinese mathematics? Where did you find this specific information
(about the decimal number system)?


Here's my source for that:
ChinaCulture.org
Wikipedia also has a nice article on the history of mathematics, listing
many Chinese accomplishments.

Literacy

Quote:
How much extra time does an adult foreign learner need for
Chinese or Japanese just due to their having a pictograph writing system?
The same question can be asked about native schoolchildren - how many
extra school hours are spent on mastering the more complex writing
system?


It appears that one period a day in a Japanese school is devoted to the
Japanese language — writing and so on. Children have little difficulty
learning all the characters as they're taught.

I read a book once (I can't remember the title) that noted how school
instruction techniques and discipline are far more important than the
subjective "difficulty" of a language when it comes to literacy. Comparing
Italy, Britain, and Japan at the time (the 70s or 80s), it noted:

1. Italian has one of the world's easiest spelling systems — an adult can
learn it in a day. Yet, the average Italian child is years behind his English
peer in learning to read.

2. English spelling is much harder than Italian, and arguably much easier
than Japanese. Yet the average English child lags a Japanese child's
reading skills as much as the Italian lags the English.

Quote:
So, these double entendres can't even be spoken?


No. :)

Quote:
One last question: how inflecting are the grammars of Mandarin
and Japanese? How are these inflections, if any, handled by pictographs?


Mandarin has no inflection. Neither does Japanese, but it uses postfixes
to conjugate verbs and indicate noun functions. This is primarily what the
kana (phonetic characters) are used for. A Japanese verb is typically
written [kanji root + kana ending]. The choice of kanji can sometimes
even indicate nuance of meaning not present in the spoken language.

Quote:

Or the literacy rate. I believe Japan has one of the highest literacy rates in
the world.


I wouldn't doubt it. Japanese are avid readers; there's a bookstore every
few blocks (including one next door to me), and typically half the people
on any subway train are reading, either novels or manga. Everywhere you
go, people are sitting or standing around reading. You just don't see that
in North America. :)

Edited by Captain Haddock on 30 July 2006 at 10:30pm

1 person has voted this message useful



lengua
Senior Member
United States
polyglottery.wordpre
Joined 6670 days ago

549 posts - 595 votes 
Studies: French, Italian, Spanish, German

 
 Message 107 of 150
27 August 2006 at 8:17am | IP Logged 
^ That's because we're addicted to television :^).


2 persons have voted this message useful



VityaCo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7067 days ago

79 posts - 86 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, Ukrainian*, English
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, French

 
 Message 108 of 150
22 November 2006 at 2:04am | IP Logged 

I always think that Arabic is much overlooked in importance when it
comes to assessing the 'most important' world languages. [/QUOTE]

It is so true.
1 person has voted this message useful



VityaCo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7067 days ago

79 posts - 86 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, Ukrainian*, English
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, French

 
 Message 109 of 150
22 November 2006 at 3:08am | IP Logged 
Eriol wrote:

- Ukraine: Ukrainian 67% (I thought it was about 67% russian, but what do I know I've only been there once? )




These are the right numbers. Seems, like you do not trust to statistics. In the Ukraine a half of those who speak Russian, can switch to Ukrainian overnight, and the opposit is also true.
1 person has voted this message useful



VityaCo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7067 days ago

79 posts - 86 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, Ukrainian*, English
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, French

 
 Message 110 of 150
22 November 2006 at 3:44am | IP Logged 
administrator wrote:
from a strictly utilitarian perspective

I would say that those perspectives are individual for everyone. As of myself, I'm going study those languages that I'm planning to use, and therefore Chinese is not on my list. Simply, because I do not know what to do with it.
1 person has voted this message useful



dontaskjeevez
Newbie
United States
Joined 6665 days ago

15 posts - 16 votes
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 111 of 150
26 November 2006 at 11:10pm | IP Logged 
I don't understand why people keep saying that Chinese is going to
become a signifigant language of the future, and that knowledge of the
language will somehow make you rich. If that were the case then China
would have the higest national gross in the world lol. But what I am really
trying to say is, I think some people are overestimating China's
improvement in economy. People are saying that it is doing so great and
all that....WELL YEAH, compared to how it has BEEN. What I am saying is
say you make F's on all your tests and you begin to start making D's thats
100% improvement in your test taking abilities, so yes it looks like you
ARE improving, but then if you look at the overall percentage of the class
and everyonelse is making A pluses, then your grade looks much much
worse. So yes China's economy is IMPROVING now compared to how it
had BEEN, but who's to say they'll ever be the largest world power, and I
know anythings possible, but this is probobly 99% UNLIKELY in OUR
lifetime. Even if this DOES happen why do you think knowing Mandarin
will make you rich, considering there are probobly about 6 Chinese
people to every 1 American, or w/e you come from (maybe less maybe
more) I don't think they'll have trouble finding proficient, and highly
intelligent, and probobly more qualified speakers. (Chinese schools are
very rigorous and higly motivated- I had a math teacher from China and
have heard many stories about the extremely high drive of success in
China, considering other job options such as rural work which has some
of the most horrible conditions you can think of but this is another long
story) Now I am not saying this should STOP anyone from studying the
Chinese language, but I think they should sort out their reasons for
wanting to. If it is a genuine love of Chinese history, culture, ect then
thats a great reason, that is the reason I am learning French, but if it is
because you THINK it will make you rich! Then that is just ridiculous! If
that is the case and you do acheive native like proficiency in the language,
then good luck with that qualification considering at least 1 billion people
have already accomplished that feat. This is not mean't to be
discouraging to Chinese learners, but if your learning the language for
superficial reasons like becoming rich then your a fool, and you will
probobly not ever be rich with this kind of thinking. However if it is a
dream of yours to live in China or communicate with, or work with the
Chinese than this will obviously be a great advantage to your life, and
career, and bring wealth into your life inn a deeper way.
1 person has voted this message useful



SamD
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6645 days ago

823 posts - 987 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, French
Studies: Portuguese, Norwegian

 
 Message 112 of 150
27 November 2006 at 11:11am | IP Logged 
Chinese is one of the most demanding languages for Western learners. It's a major commitment, and so you need to be really motivated to learn it well.

I agree with dontaskjeevez that you probably shouldn't expect to get rich just because you speak the language. However, people with other skills to combine with language ability might be in high demand.

Where I live, there are very few Chinese-speaking people. I have no plans to travel to Asia soon, so Chinese is not a particularly immediately practical language for me. However, if other people are attracted to Chinese, I wouldn't try to discourage them. I just don't think that the money is there for the amount of work that is involved.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 150 messages over 19 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 1.0166 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.