Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Intensity is the Secret

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
87 messages over 11 pages: 1 2 3 4 57 ... 6 ... 10 11 Next >>
slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6677 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 41 of 87
13 April 2009 at 1:34am | IP Logged 

Javi, when I write about intensity I mean in a flow state with a lot of focus. When we are in this intensity state we are more efficient.

We need time, but we need to develop this intensity state when we are spending time with our target(s) language(s). That's why interesting content, fun or good emotions associated to learning languages are so important. They help us to develop these resourceful states.




1 person has voted this message useful



Steve Kaufmann
Newbie
Canada
thelinguist.blogs.co
Joined 5707 days ago

20 posts - 24 votes

 
 Message 42 of 87
13 April 2009 at 6:18am | IP Logged 
I cannot answer you Javi, because it depends on what you like to do. Once, however, I am at the same level in a language as you are in English, I no longer use learner content like Assimil.

I totally agree with Slucido's comment.
1 person has voted this message useful



icing_death
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5863 days ago

296 posts - 302 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 43 of 87
13 April 2009 at 8:40am | IP Logged 
Steve Kaufmann wrote:
It is a matter of efficiency, of not studying lists of words out of context

Did linq stop using flashcards then?

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6013 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 44 of 87
13 April 2009 at 10:38am | IP Logged 
If your language is ambiguous, how is it the reader's fault if he reads it wrong? You assume that I misunderstand only because I chose to be pernickety. I'm sure I missed something, and I'm sure there's plenty of people who have missed even more than me.

Now that we've got a definition of intensity = flow, I can pin down exactly where the confusion comes from. To most people, Javi's definition of intensive is far more recognisable: narrowly focussed tasks involving a lot of conscious effort.

As you say:
Quote:
maybe it is pointless to promote intensity as the key to language learning. Maybe that will just scare people.

It scares people precisely because they think you're saying what Javi was talking about.

Edited by Cainntear on 13 April 2009 at 10:41am

1 person has voted this message useful



charlmartell
Super Polyglot
Senior Member
Portugal
Joined 6246 days ago

286 posts - 298 votes 
Speaks: French, English, German, Luxembourgish*, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Dutch, Italian, Latin, Ancient Greek
Studies: Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 45 of 87
13 April 2009 at 11:42am | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
If your language is ambiguous, how is it the reader's fault if he reads it wrong? You assume that I misunderstand only because I chose to be pernickety. I'm sure I missed something, and I'm sure there's plenty of people who have missed even more than me.

I did promise myself not to read your posts anymore, but that is proving practically impossible as you are such a prolific, difficult to avoid poster.
I'd have thought that after your disastrous contribution to the 'Michel Thomas Method via software?' thread you might curb your finding fault with others a little. No fat chance, you just go on contradicting others and putting them "right".
You'd better stop trying to prove yourself such a superior thinker. You're not, you're just deluding yourself. Instead of pontificating, why not spend your time more productively? You could always take your own advice and learn some Spanish, properly.

Edited by charlmartell on 13 April 2009 at 11:45am

1 person has voted this message useful



Volte
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Switzerland
Joined 6441 days ago

4474 posts - 6726 votes 
Speaks: English*, Esperanto, German, Italian
Studies: French, Finnish, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 46 of 87
13 April 2009 at 12:00pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
If your language is ambiguous, how is it the reader's fault if he reads it wrong? You assume that I misunderstand only because I chose to be pernickety. I'm sure I missed something, and I'm sure there's plenty of people who have missed even more than me.


All human communication using natural language is ambiguous. You can choose to glorify in that, or to make a good-faith effort to understand, and ask questions rather than assuming the issuer of the statement is an incoherent idiot.

It's entirely up to you, but I find the good-faith version to be a lot more productive.

If you think you're missing something, the best thing to do is ask for a clarification; with any luck, it'll also be useful to those who miss more than you.

Cainntear wrote:

Now that we've got a definition of intensity = flow, I can pin down exactly where the confusion comes from. To most people, Javi's definition of intensive is far more recognisable: narrowly focussed tasks involving a lot of conscious effort.


Intensity has two major definitions in language learning.
One is in contrast to 'extensive'; this is the form Javi was using.
The other is "spending a large percentage of your time on something"; this is the form in terms such as 'intensive course'.

Context usually makes which one is meant clear; you need to be aware of both to meaningfully participate in many discussions.

Cainntear wrote:

As you say:
Quote:
maybe it is pointless to promote intensity as the key to language learning. Maybe that will just scare people.

It scares people precisely because they think you're saying what Javi was talking about.


Doubtful; the idea of spending 10 hours a day scares most people even more, in my opinion. Regardless, some people get scared either way.

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6013 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 48 of 87
13 April 2009 at 2:49pm | IP Logged 
Aya, there's no need to start using personal insults.
Aya wrote:
I can easily concentrate on a task for eight to twelve hours a day. So, statistically, there must be other people who are in a position to do it.

That's definitely true, but those other people are a statistical minority, and any advice that requires that level of focus is not of general use, whereas discussing techniques is far more widely applicable, as the same techniques can be used for someone who can only concentrate for 1 hour at a time as for someone who can concentrate for 12.

(Unless there's a strong correlation between learning styles and length of study sessions -- I haven't heard of any research that suggests this, but then I don't really follow that side of things.)


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 87 messages over 11 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57 8 9 10 11  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.