Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Reading without a dictionary

  Tags: Reading | Book
 Language Learning Forum : Books, Literature & Reading Post Reply
36 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 35  Next >>
patuco
Diglot
Moderator
Gibraltar
Joined 7006 days ago

3795 posts - 4268 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 25 of 36
09 September 2006 at 7:18pm | IP Logged 
linguanima wrote:
If reading is the main means of gaining vocabulary, for native or non-native speakers alike, then how does a native speaker gain his or her vocabulary

Through years of growing up and being told what things are and being corrected by adults when you get them wrong.
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6759 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 26 of 36
09 September 2006 at 8:58pm | IP Logged 
Plus, as it's generally understood, children's brains are in a unique stage of development and assimilate new words more effortlessly.

Naturally, a child can only learn words he's been exposed to in context, so reading can play a large role. Anyone who's read a lot through one's childhood and teens will have a broader vocabulary.

Things might be different in an oral society; I suppose in such a case, one's vocabulary would depend one how many stories one listened to and learned to repeat. The most accomplished storytellers would have the broadest vocabularies.
1 person has voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6934 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 27 of 36
10 September 2006 at 1:15am | IP Logged 
lengua wrote:
frenkeld wrote:
There is another way to read without a dictionary, which operates on a more subconscious level. You basically open a book and just read on at a brisk pace, hardly ever pausing to analyze anything, the only criterion being whether you are following the plot at least somewhat.

Kato Lomb used this to great effect.


I've read the Russian translation of an older edition of her book, which is available online, and there seems to be a certain disconnect between what she herself says about her methods and what other people say about her.

In particular, she talks about reading a book once or twice without a dictionary, but then reading it again with a dictionary, recording the new words of interest to the learner. One of her arguments for why one needs to read without a dictionary is that an adult brain likes a challenge and is more likely to remember the word it figured out rather than merely looked up. This suggests more of an analytical approach to reading. She may have combined this approach with the more "cowboy" reading style, but I don't remember if she ever mentions it. She also suggests starting with simplified readers, if they are available. Overall, it looks like she wasn't quite as "wild" as people like to portray her, unless, of course, she held back a lot while writing her book or changed the presentation in the later editions of her book.

One thing she does say is that she likes to start on reading almost as soon as she starts on a textbook (yes, she used textbooks), but that's likely not all that unusual either for an experienced learner.


Edited by frenkeld on 10 September 2006 at 8:13am

1 person has voted this message useful



Kimsuhee
Tetraglot
Newbie
Korea, South
Joined 6937 days ago

27 posts - 28 votes
5 sounds
Speaks: Korean*, Mandarin, EnglishC1, German

 
 Message 28 of 36
10 September 2006 at 5:57am | IP Logged 
frenkeld wrote:
I don't know if it will work with Chinese, for example, but one can certainly try it with Romance languages and perhaps, if one believes Charles Berlitz, German as well.


On the contrary,it works with chinese but not with Romance languages for me.:-)

Here,most of you seem to speak Romance language or English so it's much easier to read books in Romance languages without dictionary.
For me as Korean I can read books in Chinese and Japanese easily,but for reading German books I have disadavantage for guessing meaning.When I took German course,our teacher let us to guess some complicated German words of Latin origin.Most of western students could guess it immediately,but for the Asian students including me,it was just more unfamiliar and harder than normal German words.

Nevertheless,I'm slowly trying to read German books without dictionary.At the very beginning,I bought a novel written in easy German for foreigners.(From 'ER-Easy Readers').And then I bought just normal novels and I looked up words what I was curious to know and wrote down in my notebook.
After finishing a few books in that way,I read books now almost without dictionarary,but at least I look up verbs for catching up the story more exactly.Sometimes I feel nervous because I wonder if it just wastes or not and how much it will help for my German ability. But my middle conclusion:It's worth it.

Edited by Kimsuhee on 10 September 2006 at 6:00am

1 person has voted this message useful



tuffy
Triglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
Joined 7025 days ago

1394 posts - 1412 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, German
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 29 of 36
10 September 2006 at 8:47am | IP Logged 
Some people read with dictionaries, I have one question about that. For me, when I lookup a word, I forget it pretty quick again! I have to repeat a lot, preferably 2 days. So is it handy then to lookup words?
My guess is that when you continue reading you'll encounter it again and maybe after looking up twice or thrice :) you slowy learn it? Is that how you do it? Or are there people who lookup a word once and then remember it?
1 person has voted this message useful



patuco
Diglot
Moderator
Gibraltar
Joined 7006 days ago

3795 posts - 4268 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 30 of 36
10 September 2006 at 8:54am | IP Logged 
Quote:
For me, when I lookup a word, I forget it pretty quick again!

In your case, perhaps writing them down and making flashcards might be a good idea.
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6759 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 31 of 36
10 September 2006 at 9:17am | IP Logged 
tuffy wrote:
My guess is that when you continue reading you'll encounter it again and maybe after looking up twice or thrice :) you slowy learn it? Is that how you do it? Or are there people who lookup a word once and then remember it?


With French, I usually remembered a new word after 2 or 3 trips to the dictionary. Japanese words usually require more encounters to sink in, for some reason.
1 person has voted this message useful



lengua
Senior Member
United States
polyglottery.wordpre
Joined 6675 days ago

549 posts - 595 votes 
Studies: French, Italian, Spanish, German

 
 Message 32 of 36
10 September 2006 at 9:31am | IP Logged 
^ Same with me (for French and Spanish). It usually takes a couple of times. Generally, the more frustrated I am at my inability to use the word during s/t, the more likely I am to look it up, and to remember it.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 36 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 2 35  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.8281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.