Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Homogenik TAC 2012 Polish Team Żubr

  Tags: Dabbling | Polish | Mandarin
 Language Learning Forum : Language Learning Log Post Reply
115 messages over 15 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 ... 14 15 Next >>
Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 7149 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 73 of 115
11 April 2012 at 10:48pm | IP Logged 
Homogenik wrote:
Quote:
A colloquial alternative to dwaj/trzej/czterej/obaj is to use the genitive-accusative-locative look-alike
forms dwóch/trzech/czterech/obu. If you stick to this less formal use, then the verb will be reinterpreted as
singular. It may have something to do with using something commonly associated with the genitive plural (i.e.
dwóch/trzech/czterech/obu) which conventionally takes verbs in singular too.


Thanks, I thought it might be colloquial, but still... Are both forms interchangeable?


More or less but it's not considered that suitable to use dwóch/trzech/czterech/obu instead of dwaj/trzej/czterej/obaj in writing.

Keep this set of terms SEPARATE from collective numerals. You seem to be getting tripped up by associating these "masculine human" numerals with the collective ones.

Homogenik wrote:
On Wikipedia it says this :

Quote:
Polish also has a series of numerals called collective numerals (liczebniki zbiorowe), namely dwoje (for 2),
troje (for 3), czworo (for 4), pięcioro (for 5), and so on. These are used with the following types of nouns:
dzieci ("children"), and words for the young of animals such as kocięta ("kittens");
pluralia tantum, i.e. nouns which lack a singular form (like drzwi "door(s)", urodziny "birthday(s)")
plural nouns referring to a group containing both sexes (for example, czworo studentów refers to a mixed-sex
group of four students).


But some examples in my book don't conform to this :

Dwóch mężczyzn czeka w kolejce.
Dwóch dyrektorów spotyka się w sprawie strajku.


Oh, but they do.

In more formal settings, you would use "Dwaj mężczyźni czekają w kolejce." instead of "Dwóch mężczyzn czeka w kolejce." and "Dwaj dyrektorzy (or: 'dyrektorowie') spotykją się w sprawie strajku." instead of "Dwóch dyrektorów spotyka się w sprawie strajku."

The collective numerals are different. They ennumerate groups containing male and female humans, groups of young animals or items that are thought of as consisting of existing meaningfully in plural (rather like the English "x pairs of scissors", "x pairs of trousers" - in jargon these are called pluralia tantum). In poetry, you may also see these numerals modifying body parts that are often thought of as a pair.

Therefore you could NOT say something like *Dwoje mężczyzn czeka w kolejce. It'll be either Dwaj mężczyźni czekają w kolejce. or more colloquially Dwóch mężczyzn czeka w kolejce..

However you would use these collective numerals in examples such as the following:
Dwoje dzieci pije herbatę. [gender of the kids are unknown or there's a boy and a girl involved]
Troje ludzi pije wino. [gender of the people involved is not important here]
Czworo studentów pije piwo. [a known combination of male and female students constituing 4 students in total are involved]

If I were to say Czterech studentów pije piwo. it could mean that there are 4 male students (in which case it would be "proper" and clearer to say Czterej studenci piją piwo.), 4 female students (in which case it would be "proper" or clearer to say Cztery studentki piją piwo.) or it could be a group of 4 students drinking beer but I didn't bother to find out or just don't know/care which gender each student is.

If we were talking about a group of inanimate objects, we would use these collective numbers on objects where the plurality is important to their perception.

E.g.

Pięcioro kleszczy jest na stole. "5 [pairs of] pliers are on the table." (versus: Kleszcze są na stole. "[A pair of] pliers is on the table.")

Yet you can't say: *Pięcioro krzeseł jest w pokoju. but Pięć krzeseł jest w pokoju. since an armchair is not viewed in the same way as a pair of pliers or other plural-only noun.

Honestly, the best way to get around this is to do some exercises. Thinking about it can drive you nuts since you have to consciously connect the nouns with agreement. (e.g. Pięcioro kleszczy jest na stole. takes singular (even though we're talking about 5 pairs of pliers but Kleszcze są na stole. takes plural even though we're talking about 1 pair of pliers)
2 persons have voted this message useful



Homogenik
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 4817 days ago

314 posts - 407 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Polish, Mandarin

 
 Message 74 of 115
11 April 2012 at 11:26pm | IP Logged 
Thanks a lot, that really helped me to understand.
1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 7149 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 75 of 115
12 April 2012 at 4:51pm | IP Logged 
Nie ma za co.
1 person has voted this message useful



Homogenik
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 4817 days ago

314 posts - 407 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Polish, Mandarin

 
 Message 76 of 115
14 April 2012 at 3:22pm | IP Logged 
Polish : Oh, yesterday I found a little gem at a bookstore : an old copy of Sienkiewicz's W pustyni i w
puszczy
(In desert and wilderness), a classic polish novel published in 1912. But the book I found was in
polish, which is amazingly rare here, very surprising, and it's an old edition as well. I started to read a bit and
understand enough to find my way through the first few pages. I was surprised to find some strange forms of words
that I figured must be an older polish style, for instance :

me instead of moje
swe instead of swoje

And certain words that were written together and are now separate, for instance... I can't remember offhand, I'll
have to come back with the actual book! But it's quite fascinating.

Edited by Homogenik on 15 April 2012 at 7:28pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Homogenik
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 4817 days ago

314 posts - 407 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Polish, Mandarin

 
 Message 77 of 115
15 April 2012 at 7:13pm | IP Logged 
Chinese : I finally ended Pimsleur I (I could have gone over the last lessons again and again but decided to
move on as it will never be perfect anyway...). I started lesson one of Pim. II this morning and boy did I suck, but oh
well I'll do it again. I'm also advancing slowly but surely with Basic Spoken/Written Chinese. I really like how it's
done. There are different kinds of exercises, some are listening exercises (listen to conversation and answer
questions on paper), substitution exercises with audio recording (you have to say a phrase, for instance Ni dao nar
qu?, and then repeat the same phrase with various subjects or verbs that are said on the recording), translation
exercises you have to do verbally and others by writing, and many grammatical and cultural notes. The writing
exercises are mostly listening to an audio file and writing down the characters you hear, or reading exercises (there
are many of those).


1 person has voted this message useful



Homogenik
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 4817 days ago

314 posts - 407 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Polish, Mandarin

 
 Message 78 of 115
25 April 2012 at 3:21am | IP Logged 
Chinese : I found a chinese girl student at the university and I'll meet her tomorrow. She wants to learn a bit
of English so we'll exchange services. I'm glad, it should be fruitful and interesting.

Polish : I'm having a little trouble with the declensions of numbers as they are rather complicated. I'll have to
do a few exercises more to make it. I've been lazy these last few days and the weather has been awful, which has
affected my morale (and it's been my birthday... yet again!!!).


1 person has voted this message useful



Vos
Diglot
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 5559 days ago

766 posts - 1020 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Dutch, Polish

 
 Message 79 of 115
25 April 2012 at 4:11am | IP Logged 
Happy Birthday Homogenik! Hope you had a wonderful day. And what a find with W pustyni i w
puszczy
, nice one. Unfortunately my polish studies have had to be put aside for now due to uni, so I'll be
enjoying the wondrous language via you, Mooby and Amerykanka for the time being, hopefully I'll be able to join
you all again in active study later on in the year, but will most definitely be following all of your logs with much
interest till then. Hope all is well in Canada, and you must be off to Poland soon no? How amazing it will be! Take
care.
1 person has voted this message useful



Amerykanka
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5164 days ago

657 posts - 890 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Polish, Latin, Ancient Greek, Russian

 
 Message 80 of 115
26 April 2012 at 2:44pm | IP Logged 
Happy Birthday (a few days late)! That is really neat that you found a copy of W pustyni i w puszczy - it is
a very good book! It does use some rather old-fashioned language, though.

Good luck with the declensions of numbers! I need to work on those myself.



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 115 messages over 15 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.7344 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.