Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Shadowing: yay or nay?

 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies Post Reply
Poll Question: Do you shadow regularly?
Poll Choice Votes Poll Statistics
59 [52.21%]
54 [47.79%]
You can not vote in this poll

67 messages over 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 7 ... 8 9 Next >>
Leopejo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Italy
Joined 6108 days ago

675 posts - 724 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, Finnish*, English
Studies: French, Russian

 
 Message 49 of 67
04 October 2009 at 12:51pm | IP Logged 
J-Learner wrote:
People accusing it of not reaching perfection are missing the entire point of language learning methods - will one method along bring perfection?

I don't think people argue for or against this.

Quote:
Just because something is hard - does that make it impossible or useless?

No. Though given a choice, you often look for the optimal solution. If you get the same results with two possible methods, would you choose the harder one?

Quote:
Just some questions to be answered by those who don't make self-deception a habit :)

We want names! :-D

Quote:
You bunch are going to sit back and argue over the fantasy of finding an objectively perfect language learning method that works for everyone and all times...

Who? Where?

Quote:
snig: you (like many others) haven't got a single clue what shadowing is...

I haven't either, so please explain. Unfortunately I self-imposed not to visit Prof. Arguelles's threads.

EDIT: if this looks confrontational, it's just by express request by my dear friend J-Learner. :-)

Edited by Leopejo on 04 October 2009 at 12:54pm

1 person has voted this message useful



J-Learner
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 6029 days ago

556 posts - 636 votes 
Studies: Yiddish, English*
Studies: Dutch

 
 Message 50 of 67
04 October 2009 at 1:04pm | IP Logged 
Thanks, as always Leo.

No, one wouldn't do the harder method. People sure seem to want to do the easier method and complain about less results though :D

Me and Professor A. A. seems to be very similar in our learning methods. That and I've bothed to take the time to see what he has to say...something 90% of the people posting in this thread, haven't.

:)
1 person has voted this message useful



Leopejo
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Italy
Joined 6108 days ago

675 posts - 724 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, Finnish*, English
Studies: French, Russian

 
 Message 51 of 67
04 October 2009 at 1:10pm | IP Logged 
J-Learner wrote:
No, one wouldn't do the harder method. People sure seem to want to do the easier method and complain about less results though :D

Actually many people here *do* complain how most courses are getting too easy - or better, dumbed down. See the popularity in these forums of old versions of Assimil, Linguaphone or even Teach Yourself as compared to the modern versions. So, it's not looking for easy as much as it is looking for effective.

Quote:
Me and Professor A. A. seems to be very similar in our learning methods. That and I've bothed to take the time to see what he has to say...something 90% of the people posting in this thread, haven't.

I saw once that guy walking up and down and muttering strange words on youtube? Was that shadowing?

;-)
1 person has voted this message useful



Ocius
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5589 days ago

48 posts - 77 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Ancient Greek
Studies: French, Latin, Sanskrit

 
 Message 52 of 67
04 October 2009 at 11:34pm | IP Logged 
I tried shadowing briefly, but found I have a similar issue with it as Iverson. When I start talking, I become too focused on the sounds I'm making to focus heavily on input, which, in my opinion, is far more important. I much prefer simple, repetitive L-R -- even while using Assimil, FSI, or other courses that can be used well for Shadowing.

Ultimately, it's probably a matter of preference. When I want to practice accent, I pause the tape and try to imitate the sound, then repeat the sentence and compare. When I want to practice input, I prefer to keep output out of it.
2 persons have voted this message useful



crafedog
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5817 days ago

166 posts - 337 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Korean, Tok Pisin, French

 
 Message 53 of 67
22 October 2010 at 8:08pm | IP Logged 
I started shadowing for about about 2 weeks in Korean in a manner similar to how the
professor did it (but not outside). Two native speakers who saw me frequently commented
that my pronunciation had increased a lot. Shadowing helped me pay attention to the
intonation and 'way' of speaking Korean that I wouldn't get from a classroom or CDs. It
also might it easier to see that no matter how good some non-Koreans might get with the
language, there are certain parts of Korean that you won't pick up unless you really
pay attention to how it's spoken. I might try it again soon because I'm still not 100%
on the intonation (or lack of) and the prosody or I might just wait till I buy some
Korean Dvds.

I never did it with Spanish but I'm going to try it soon and see if it helps.

(in case anyone's curious I used '2000 Essential Korean Words for Beginners' by
Darakwon for the Korean shadowing)
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6702 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 54 of 67
22 October 2010 at 9:36pm | IP Logged 
) still don't shadow. I'm fairly sure it is effective if you can make it work, but I get severaly distracted by the sound of myself speaking so I don't hear a thing. However I do my silent thinking, and I have also taken to speaking to myself when nobody else is around - maybe a sign of beginning senility. I have been speculating about speech with 'holes' where you can repeat (even though profArguelles doesn't find this as effective as simultaneous speech, aka shadowing). The examples I have heard from text book systems were intolerably dull, uninteresting and slow, but maybe it is enough to listen to something with your finger on a shut-up button ... provided that you can accept to miss half of what is said.   
1 person has voted this message useful



lingoleng
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5297 days ago

605 posts - 1290 votes 

 
 Message 55 of 67
22 October 2010 at 11:28pm | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
) still don't shadow. I'm fairly sure it is effective if you can make it work, but I get severaly distracted by the sound of myself speaking so I don't hear a thing.

I see the problem and have a suggestion:
Shadowing (the technique) can be done without speaking, just in the mind.
The real core of shadowing as I understand and use it (this may not have to do much with anything Prof. Arguelles says or proposes) is the splitting of the mental process: You listen to correct native language material (what is good, already a little bit an active process, but still overall more a passive thing), and at the same time you try pretending it is you who produces this language (what is a very "active" activity, as opposed to even active listening, what is the best listening, of course).
You listen to the person who speaks, and at the same time you become the speaker.

When I do this I am not primarily interested in phonetic correctness or accent building (it can be done with this intention, of course), and so I don't have to speak out loud what I am thinking/listening/reinventing. It is just two processes which are running at the same time inside of the mind.
This way you would not have the interference with your own physical voice (what you need is the inner mental voice of course, but this one is the core of shadowing in this sense and cannot be omitted, otherwise you are only listening).
I am not sure if my description is hopelessly inadequate, introspection is difficult and necessarily vague, I guess; It may be trivial, and maybe everybody does it this way, or it may be complex, and not everybody can do it, I don't know, but the crucial point here is, that you don't have to speak and can still get most of the benefit of the technique.



Edited by lingoleng on 22 October 2010 at 11:41pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



Old Chemist
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5172 days ago

227 posts - 285 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 56 of 67
23 October 2010 at 12:50pm | IP Logged 
I have had the best results when I also try to visualize myself in the situation. This is really hard for me, but stops my mind wandering and forces me to concentrate on what I am trying to learn. I think shadowing or any sort of repetition alone does not completely work for me. I once listened to a priest talking about how he had repeated the same text every morning for years and could not remember it!


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 67 messages over 9 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 68 9  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3750 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.