Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

About ’Flemish’ language

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post Reply
64 messages over 8 pages: 13 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>
Jar-ptitsa
Triglot
Senior Member
Belgium
Joined 5898 days ago

980 posts - 1006 votes 
Speaks: French*, Dutch, German

 
 Message 9 of 64
10 May 2009 at 12:14am | IP Logged 
Witproduct OF Jbbar

waarom schrijf je niet onder je oorspronkelijke nick, JBBAR?????
1 person has voted this message useful



ennime
Tetraglot
Senior Member
South Africa
universityofbrokengl
Joined 5904 days ago

397 posts - 507 votes 
Speaks: English, Dutch*, Esperanto, Afrikaans
Studies: Xhosa, French, Korean, Portuguese, Zulu

 
 Message 10 of 64
10 May 2009 at 6:15am | IP Logged 
Vinbelgium wrote:
Flemish is completely different from the Dutch spoken in Holland.
I think you could
say it's a different language, like some people say American is a seperate language.

I can speak Dutch like a native, but I do have trouble to understand a person from The
Netherlands. They speak way too fast, and use a different range of vocabulary.


That might just be because the Flemish speak better Dutch than the Dutch do ^_^

but seriously... American is not a separate language, it is a collection of a group of
dialects with sometimes pronunciations that make it harder to understand. And there is
no such thing as "Flemish" as a unified "language" or "dialect".

1 person has voted this message useful



Earle
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6315 days ago

276 posts - 276 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Norwegian, Spanish

 
 Message 11 of 64
10 May 2009 at 7:03am | IP Logged 
"American" and "British" is not a good analogy at all. Americans can understand British who can understand Australians who can understand Kiwis and South Africans. One of the startling things about English is its uniformity, not its diversity. Certainly a rural farmer (yes, some of them aren't "rural") in the American South might have a bit of difficulty understanding some rural English accents, but they'd communicate. And they live thousands of kilometers apart, rather than a few dozen. Think about it...
1 person has voted this message useful



Recht
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5801 days ago

241 posts - 270 votes 
Speaks: English*, GermanB1

 
 Message 12 of 64
10 May 2009 at 11:02am | IP Logged 
Earle wrote:
"American" and "British" is not a good analogy at all. Americans can
understand British who can understand Australians who can understand Kiwis and South
Africans. One of the startling things about English is its uniformity, not its
diversity. Certainly a rural farmer (yes, some of them aren't "rural") in the
American South might have a bit of difficulty understanding some rural English
accents, but they'd communicate. And they live thousands of kilometers apart, rather
than a few dozen. Think about it...


That's the point. The thread starter was commenting on how the language spoken by
those from Holland is the exact same as the one spoken by the Flemish, and hence I
give an example of a language with similar qualities, intelligible by all.
1 person has voted this message useful



Jar-ptitsa
Triglot
Senior Member
Belgium
Joined 5898 days ago

980 posts - 1006 votes 
Speaks: French*, Dutch, German

 
 Message 13 of 64
10 May 2009 at 12:03pm | IP Logged 
Flemish can undertsand Dutch and vice versa when those people speak the standard language: the
pronunciation is evident if the perosn's from NL or B, but it's completely mutually intelligible, therfore the
analogy Dutch/Flemihs and british English/American English is ok

BUT in Britain there exist other languages e.g. Welsh, which are British but completely spearated of English, and
therefore you can't say "British" but must precise "Britsh English". And there exist certain dialects of Flemish,
which the other flemish and the Dutch can't understand well: West Flemish, but this is more specific. There's the
analogy with French also: the French: Belgian/french/Quebec - are one languages, although like Flemish, not all
the things are possible to undertsand, for exmaple Quebec's slang.

I agree with witproduct, that flemish and Dutch = one language and that the forum hasn't to have both,
especially if it hasn't Scots, Limburgs or others of the disputed dialect/language category. But why witporudct
blamed the francophones??? This chauvenism was not nice.
1 person has voted this message useful



Recht
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5801 days ago

241 posts - 270 votes 
Speaks: English*, GermanB1

 
 Message 14 of 64
10 May 2009 at 1:18pm | IP Logged 
Jar-ptitsa wrote:

BUT in Britain there exist other languages e.g. Welsh, which are British but
completely spearated of English, and
therefore you can't say "British" but must precise "Britsh English".


Everyone knows we were talking about British English, and not Welsh. You could just as
easily say "Make sure you're talking about American English and not American
Cherokee". Let's not try and nitpick every single post to death, ok?
2 persons have voted this message useful



Jar-ptitsa
Triglot
Senior Member
Belgium
Joined 5898 days ago

980 posts - 1006 votes 
Speaks: French*, Dutch, German

 
 Message 15 of 64
10 May 2009 at 1:46pm | IP Logged 
Recht wrote:
Jar-ptitsa wrote:

BUT in Britain there exist other languages e.g. Welsh, which are British but
completely spearated of English, and
therefore you can't say "British" but must precise "Britsh English".


Everyone knows we were talking about British English, and not Welsh. You could just as
easily say "Make sure you're talking about American English and not American
Cherokee". Let's not try and nitpick every single post to death, ok?


I'm not try and nitpick every single post to deaht. Everyone doesn't know "British"= English because it is NOT the
same, but in Britain are some more languages, for exmaple welsh and Scottish gaelic, Cornish, also the dialect
/language Scots. It's insluting for those people if you say British =  English!!!! IT IS NOT THE SAME and everyone
doesn't know it because it's wrong.

It's like when you wrote why it's necessary that the amercians say "I'm Italian-american" because everyone know
it that they're Americans therfore it's like to say: I'm human. It is not liek this, because it's it's evident for
americans that they are americans, but for all thworld not at all.
1 person has voted this message useful



Jar-ptitsa
Triglot
Senior Member
Belgium
Joined 5898 days ago

980 posts - 1006 votes 
Speaks: French*, Dutch, German

 
 Message 16 of 64
10 May 2009 at 1:52pm | IP Logged 
There are some scottish who visit this forum, for exmaple cainntear and Gibbermeister. Ask those people if British
= English and they will say "NO!!!!!!!!!!!" British = English, welsh, scottish.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 64 messages over 8 pages: << Prev 13 4 5 6 7 8  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3906 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.