Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Is Chinese going to be the lingua franca?

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
249 messages over 32 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 19 ... 31 32 Next >>
Rikyu-san
Diglot
Senior Member
Denmark
Joined 5529 days ago

213 posts - 413 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, English
Studies: German, French

 
 Message 145 of 249
17 November 2009 at 12:40am | IP Logged 
Here is a short article (in Danish) about the seven deadly sins turned into virtues:

http://www.ruc-pastor.dk/De_7_doedssynder_-_oplaeg_ved_bisko p_Jan.43.0.html

I don't know if the text makes sense to you with a google-like translation. Here are a few highlights in case such a translation turns into utter nonsense:

Title: "Bishop of Roskilde Jan Lindhardt tells the story of the turn of the 7 deadly sins from middle age sins into late-modern virtues"

"Deadly sins - what is that? Well, we may not even know anymore what "sin" is so the term deadly sin are perhaps located further out in the periphery of the records of our archeology of knowledge. Today the idea of sin is for most people an expression of an outdated outlook on life but it was taken very seriously by people in the Middle Ages..

... At that time it was a serious crime to commit an offence against the rules that upheld the community. Therefore it is not at all strange that these 7 are emphasised for if you look more closely, one discovers that they all have the capacity to destroy the social sphere - destroy the community.

That was in any event the view in the Middle Ages. Pride set the individual apart at the expense of others. Greed can lead to much for one or just a few and too little to the many. Similar consequences can be inferred from desire, gluttony, envy.

But today, according to Lindhardt, these concepts have become virtues because we no longer live in a society where the consideration for others is the cornerstone. Today we live in a world where the rights of the individual is center stage - the rights of the individual are inviolable and as a result a competitive and winner mentality have been given pride of place. What used to be called greed and avariciousness is now diligence, initiatve, industriousness, profits. Personal gain is the real focal point of liberal economic theory."

Once again, think about Confucian Capitalism as a different value system as the focal point for a possible new type of economic exchange.

Edited by Rikyu-san on 17 November 2009 at 12:43am

1 person has voted this message useful



Rikyu-san
Diglot
Senior Member
Denmark
Joined 5529 days ago

213 posts - 413 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, English
Studies: German, French

 
 Message 146 of 249
17 November 2009 at 12:47am | IP Logged 
Here is an example from Korea:

Koren model triumphs over West:

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Korea/KK17Dg01.html

I know only very little about Korean affairs but I find the article enlightening.

I would probably rather have the Confucian Capitalism of the East than the Confused Capitalism of the West.
1 person has voted this message useful



cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5839 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 147 of 249
17 November 2009 at 1:39am | IP Logged 
This is turning into an interesting philosophical discussion, greatly enhanced by peoples' knowledge of philosophies from across the world. Thanks for the links Rikyu.

I agree with the observations that have been touched on: General moral decay of the West; excessive consumerism and shallow hedonistic, self-centred values of the majority.

Something will have to give though: The world can't support a Western lifestyle for the majority of its population - yet that seems to be exactly what people in the new economies want. Plus, we in the West have already managed to pollute the world, and use up a lot of the existing oil. An gigantic energy crisis seems likely within our lifetimes.

In order to solve all problems that the world faces, awareness, objective info and clear lines of communication will be important. I think a common world language is needed/inevitable. I definitely don't support English in that role but right now it's the most likely candidate. Where that will leave the existing languages and cultures in the long run remains to be seen. I'd hate to see them sacrficed.

Edited by cordelia0507 on 17 November 2009 at 2:23am

1 person has voted this message useful



irrationale
Tetraglot
Senior Member
China
Joined 6051 days ago

669 posts - 1023 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Mandarin, Tagalog
Studies: Ancient Greek, Japanese

 
 Message 148 of 249
17 November 2009 at 6:11am | IP Logged 
Volte wrote:
mick33 wrote:
Rikyu-san wrote:
"Non-culture"... I like that word. What is taking place in the Western world has more to do with non-culture than a sincere cultivation of character and spirit. The passion of the Western mind at its best was not driven by hedonism but some form of higher cultivation - enlightenment, not hedonistic darkness.

A Danish writer, the Bishop of Roskilde Jan Linhardt, once wrote that in today's (Western/Danish) world, vices have become virtues. "Greed is good". Is that really what we would like to export to the rest of the world?

In Denmark, young kids have watched the equivalent of "Britain's got Talent" and sincerely believe that "if you are not famous, you are nothing". Their desires, dreams, and motivations has been shaped towards 15 minutes of fame, Warhole-style. Superficial, of no value, but of great consequence to all of us. Is that really what we would like to export to the rest of the world?

We can put it very simply:

If we are to live in a world of wisdom, we have to live in accordance with the great wisdom traditions of the world.

They might need to be updated but that is achievable. I believe the Chinese model of "Confucian Capitalism" is important to study in this light.
I think it's more "low culture" than "non-culture". Many people never think of making any effort to resist hedonism and to seek spiritual and intellectual enlightenment, but this is nothing new. What is different now is that bad taste and shallow materialism, (Britney Spears et al) the fallacy of instant gratification, and the belief that being famous actually matters are aggressively promoted worldwide as positive values we should all strive for, which is wrong. This is all part of what I would call cultural devolution which, as you point out, will continue to make ancient philosophies appear more appealing.


What makes you think this is new? Ancient philosophy is filled with rants on the same topic.



Yes, but he/she said "devolution", implying a process. A shadow doesn't move fast enough to see it move.

I think it is actually a non-culture. Why? Because one may think of culture as a set of symbols that communicate values to members of a group and form cohesiveness. It is a communication method. Cohesiveness as a given for a culture to exist. Right now what we are seeing is a set of symbols that do not have the purpose of communication, and do not form cohesiveness (necessary for a culture), but divisiveness and hyper-individualism that is inherent in post-modern capitalism. These sets of symbols are more like tools than anything else. Tools to provide people with instantaneous stimulus (which fractures social space as well as physical space into individual units).

English I feel is being sucked into this tool system for the purpose of spreading this paradigm. Something global must necessarily lose a uniqueness to a local point or people in physical space, as well as it's importance.    


4 persons have voted this message useful



ecroix
Tetraglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 6157 days ago

9 posts - 15 votes
Speaks: Malay, Hokkien, English*, Indonesian
Studies: French, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 149 of 249
24 November 2009 at 12:20pm | IP Logged 
Well apparently the Chinese doesn't really care whether Mandarin dethrones English as the lingua france or
not; at least not when they are happily having serious competitions like the "CCTV CUP English Speaking
Contest".

Spend anytime watching Chinese TV programs in China (which I did) and you'll bound to come across programs
such as this:

http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNTYwMDQ3NzY=.html

Can you imagine the "BBC Cup Mandarin Speaking Contest" on TV?

Mandarin is too intertwined with Chinese civilization to be neutral enough to be used as a lingua franca. And the
CHinese know that. Realistically, the Japanese nor the Francophone nor Anglophone countries will never give in
and adopt Mandarin as lingua franca, no matter how powerful China gets. English on the other hand is currently
the world's mongrel of a language of choice simply because it belongs to no culture in particular right now. One
cannot accurately say English belongs to England or America, just as one cannot say it belongs to SIngaporeans
or Indians or Jamaicans. It doesn't really belong to anyone. The strength of English as a lingua franca is that it's
not policed liked Japanese, Chinese and French; thus there is less barriers to adoption.

I'm totally not interested in the Mandarin vs English debate. And I'm not advocating that English be made the
world's lingua franca nor is it superior. But at this point in the evolution of human speech, English's promiscuity;
it's willingness to absorb elements of other languages, makes it a natural candidate.


Edited by ecroix on 24 November 2009 at 12:22pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5522 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 151 of 249
24 November 2009 at 3:53pm | IP Logged 
ecroix wrote:

Can you imagine the "BBC Cup Mandarin Speaking Contest" on TV?


I can, but it would be different than the Chinese counterpart. Not many people can relate to the contestants or their skills.

ecroix wrote:

Mandarin is too intertwined with Chinese civilization to be neutral enough to be used as a lingua franca.


This is of course completely irrelevant. Latin started out as the local dialect in a small village in Italy. English used to be the language of a tiny people on a remote island. German was only spoken by a band of barbarians. Everyone agrees that English is much closer to being a global lingua franca AT THE MOMENT, but Mandarin has already expanded from being the dialect of a tribe to the lingua franca in a country of over a billion people from hundreds of tribes and ethnicities. In fact, this has happened in roughly the same time it took English.


4 persons have voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6769 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 152 of 249
24 November 2009 at 4:05pm | IP Logged 
ecroix wrote:
Realistically, the Japanese nor the Francophone nor Anglophone countries will never give in
and adopt Mandarin as lingua franca, no matter how powerful China gets. 


Japanese culture has deep historical connections with Chinese, and there is certainly no cultural aversion to it.
Mandarin is rapidly catching up with English in the Japanese business world. Companies pay for employees'
Chinese lessons, and job search sites all have a field asking about your Mandarin skills.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 249 messages over 32 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.7344 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.