Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Change a language today!

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
85 messages over 11 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 8 ... 10 11 Next >>
mick33
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5925 days ago

1335 posts - 1632 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Finnish
Studies: Thai, Polish, Afrikaans, Hindi, Hungarian, Italian, Spanish, Swedish

 
 Message 57 of 85
15 December 2010 at 10:45am | IP Logged 
Äs øðürz hääv alrædie staytid, spæling riefourm øv Ienglisj cød bie æn äbsuhloot dizäßtur, ään Ay büliev dayuhkridiks oar spæsjül kærækturß wød ownlie mayk it wørß. No naytiv spiekurz wød ævur uhgrie awn hau it shød bie prownäoonst bayiest awn ðuh ritin fourm øer witsj dayuhlækt shød bi ðuh ständürd. Biesaydz þät, ævriewün häs ø difrint vürsjin øv whøt cahnstitoots fownædik spæling.   

Perhaps we could bring back Middle English spelling, just for fun. Just to make sure I'm not completely misunderstood, the first few sentences were my humorous attempt to transcribe English the way I pronounce it.

Losing he/she might be a good idea for many languages though, Finnish does just fine with only "hän" for both.

Edited by mick33 on 15 December 2010 at 10:56am

3 persons have voted this message useful



Syntax
Bilingual Hexaglot
Newbie
South Africa
Joined 5096 days ago

28 posts - 40 votes
Speaks: English*, Afrikaans*, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian
Studies: Mandarin

 
 Message 58 of 85
15 December 2010 at 11:14am | IP Logged 
DEATH TO PREPOSITIONS!!!
2 persons have voted this message useful



furrykef
Senior Member
United States
furrykef.com/
Joined 6473 days ago

681 posts - 862 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, Latin, Italian

 
 Message 59 of 85
15 December 2010 at 1:46pm | IP Logged 
getreallanguage wrote:
furrykef wrote:
Make Latin more regular.


Heh. Do you seriously think Latin is all that irregular? You should try a romance language.

You mean like the "Spanish" and "Italian" that show up under my name on this forum?

Yes, Latin is very irregular. Five declensions that tend to have as many differences as similarities. Greek nouns that take different forms from Latin nouns. Four conjugations which mostly work similarly, but the future tense is completely different in the third and fourth than it is from the first and second. Many verbs that require you to memorize four principle parts. And don't forget the huge mess that is the third declension! Oh, did I mention deponence and defective verbs?

Romance languages are only really irregular in their irregular verbs, and, in my opinion, they don't present nearly as much difficulty as Latin verbs do. Only a few Spanish/Italian verbs are irregular and they tend to be irregular in consistent ways. (I'm much less experienced with Italian in this regard.) Getting a firm handle on irregular verbs in Spanish took me very little time. In fact, you tend to be able to guess when you're dealing with an irregular verb in a Romance language.

It mystifies me when people claim that Latin is regular.


Quote:
DEATH TO PREPOSITIONS!!!

OK. What would you replace them with? :)

2 persons have voted this message useful



Bao
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
tinyurl.com/pe4kqe5
Joined 5767 days ago

2256 posts - 4046 votes 
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Japanese, Mandarin

 
 Message 60 of 85
15 December 2010 at 4:26pm | IP Logged 
Liface wrote:
I'm a bit surprised at the amount of people who would change a language to make it harder and more confusing. Why?

I'm more surprised by the amound of people who would change a language to revert it to and equally confusing, yet already obsolete standard.


Oh, if I couldn't get my agglutination I'd either want there to be an autolocomotive case in any language that's cut out for it. Or a yodeling tradition in Cantonese.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Syntax
Bilingual Hexaglot
Newbie
South Africa
Joined 5096 days ago

28 posts - 40 votes
Speaks: English*, Afrikaans*, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian
Studies: Mandarin

 
 Message 61 of 85
15 December 2010 at 4:45pm | IP Logged 
furrykef wrote:
Five declensions that tend to have as many differences as
similarities.


These declensions are easy to remember, especially if you learn the nominative and
genitive singular. Only a few nouns are truly irregular (domus,deus,iuppiter,iter etc)

(okay, maybe not that few... :)

furrykef wrote:
Four conjugations which mostly work similarly, but the future tense
is completely different in the third and fourth than it is from the first and second.


The conjugations differ from each other regularly. The future tense differs
in the same way

furrykef wrote:
Many verbs that require you to memorize four principle parts.


You start to develop predictability after a while. They aren't that irregular.

furrykef wrote:
. And don't forget the huge mess that is the third declension! Oh, did
I mention deponence and defective verbs?


Okay, I'll give that to you. Death to the 3rd conjugation! (Ps, who decided to number
the declensions?)

furrykef wrote:
.Romance languages are only really irregular in their irregular verbs,
Well, that is true, but its like saying "Latin is only irregular in its
irregularities" :)

furrykef wrote:
they don't present nearly as much difficulty as Latin verbs do.
True, but don't consider difficulty irregularity. :)

furrykef wrote:
It mystifies me when people claim that Latin is regular.
Perhaps we could claim Latin is regularly irregular... :)

Right, now that I have finished that:
furrykef wrote:
Quote:
DEATH TO PREPOSITIONS!!!

OK. What would you replace them with? :)


What about the general absence of prepositions? Think about it:
In Spanish: soñar CON algo (lit. with)
English: To dream ABOUT something
Afrikaans: Om OOR iets te droom (lit. over)

English: To listen TO something
Afrikaans: Om NA iets te luister (lit. to)
Spanish: Escuchar algo (note: No preposition!)

WHY can't we say "I speak you" ?

And why don't we get rid of auxiliaries while we're at it? "I spoken you" Hmmm...

:)



2 persons have voted this message useful



ellasevia
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2011
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6143 days ago

2150 posts - 3229 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Croatian, Greek, French, Spanish, Russian, Swedish, Portuguese, Turkish, Italian
Studies: Catalan, Persian, Mandarin, Japanese, Romanian, Ukrainian

 
 Message 62 of 85
15 December 2010 at 7:16pm | IP Logged 
Syntax wrote:
What about the general absence of prepositions? Think about it:
In Spanish: soñar CON algo (lit. with)
English: To dream ABOUT something
Afrikaans: Om OOR iets te droom (lit. over)

English: To listen TO something
Afrikaans: Om NA iets te luister (lit. to)
Spanish: Escuchar algo (note: No preposition!)

WHY can't we say "I speak you" ?

And why don't we get rid of auxiliaries while we're at it? "I spoken you" Hmmm...


Cases would probably fix this. In German you CAN say "Ich spreche dir" to mean "I speak to you."
2 persons have voted this message useful



furrykef
Senior Member
United States
furrykef.com/
Joined 6473 days ago

681 posts - 862 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Japanese, Latin, Italian

 
 Message 63 of 85
16 December 2010 at 6:48am | IP Logged 
Syntax wrote:
WHY can't we say "I speak you" ?

But then how do you distinguish between "I speak to you" and "I speak about you"? How do you express "I went from the movie theater to the club" without prepositions?

Prepositions are inescapable because they make important distinctions. (The artificial language Lojban has no prepositions and instead relies upon word order, but this system is a bit of a nightmare from a practical standpoint.)

As for the idea of introducing the dative case, well, cases are just prepositions in disguise. They're just integrated into the word instead of being placed before or after it.


Edited by furrykef on 16 December 2010 at 6:51am

3 persons have voted this message useful



a3
Triglot
Senior Member
Bulgaria
Joined 5257 days ago

273 posts - 370 votes 
Speaks: Bulgarian*, English, Russian
Studies: Portuguese, German, Italian, Spanish, Norwegian, Finnish

 
 Message 64 of 85
19 December 2010 at 6:11pm | IP Logged 
Iid chaang þe Inglish speling aes aþers haev sed. Ferst aend most important, Iid bring baek þe leter þorn. [ɛj] kams from midl Inglish a: aend þeerfor it shod be speld aa. Similarli, [aj] kams from i: aend Iid maak it be speld ii. Olso Iid remoov siilent e aend dabl konsonants. Evri speeker wod riit in his/hers dialect.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 85 messages over 11 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 79 10 11  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.6094 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.