Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

February 6 Week Challenge

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
136 messages over 17 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 ... 16 17 Next >>
Solfrid Cristin
Heptaglot
Winner TAC 2011 & 2012
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 5334 days ago

4143 posts - 8864 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, Spanish, Swedish, French, English, German, Italian
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 73 of 136
15 February 2012 at 5:58pm | IP Logged 
aloysius wrote:
In this thread Sprachprofi wrote:
And you should adjust those
time units according to your concentration on the target language - for example, using
Anki for 10 minutes is probably 100% concentration for 10 minutes = 10 minutes.
However, when you're watching a movie for example, part of your concentration is
definitely on the storyline. If you're using native-language subtitles, which distract
even further from the target language, you might award yourself only 30 minutes score
for 2 hours of movie time. You have to judge it yourself because there's no one value
that fits all, and I'm relying on people being honest about this. There are no prizes
for winning after all, they'd only be cheating themselves.


Films are less dense in language than news or audiobooks so that's another reason for
reducing the time.

//aloysius


I remember this answer, but it does not really answer the question. Would it be possible to give a round figure? 50%, 75% 80%. The thing is that it is not really a level playing field if some use 50%, some use 75% and some use 100% for exactly the same thing :-)
1 person has voted this message useful



aloysius
Triglot
Winner TAC 2010 & 2012
Senior Member
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6240 days ago

226 posts - 291 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, German
Studies: French, Greek, Italian, Russian

 
 Message 74 of 136
15 February 2012 at 7:09pm | IP Logged 
I watch a lot of movies and TV in English with or
without subs and I don't count it at all. My English certainly needs improvement, so
it's not because of that, but I would have done it anyway, 6wc or no 6wc. For German
it's much more of a conscious activity. I intend to count time spent on reading or
listening to novels in English, though.

Here's what Bao wrote in the 6wc August thread:

Bao wrote:

Just wanted to ask for a heads up on the percentages I thought I'd use for different
activities:

Active study: 100% (textbook, audio course with replying/taking notes, shadowing,
memorization, exercises, Anki reps, L-R, translation, etc)
Conversation, writing: 100%
Reading, listening attentively: 100% (only 50-75%% when my concentration wavers/I skip
more than a few parts I don't understand instead of looking them up, depending on how
severe the attention issues are)
Watching movies/TV shows without subs/with target language subs: 50% of the runtime, no
extra time awarded for looking up words, taking notes etc
Watching movies/shows with subs in a different language: 33% of the runtime
Talk shows, comedy, game shows: 100% of runtime

Maintenance of a 'fluent' language: 50% of the above values, tasks that are aimed at
maintenance or improvement only

[...]

Oh, I came to the movie/TV values by reading subtitles and comparing the time it took
me with the runtime of the episode; I came out with 1/4 to 1/3 of the runtime. Added
some leeway for rewatching scenes to catch what exactly was said, taking notes, looking
up vocab.

Does that sound fair to you?


Edited by aloysius on 15 February 2012 at 7:14pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



jdmoncada
Tetraglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5034 days ago

470 posts - 741 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Finnish
Studies: Russian, Japanese

 
 Message 75 of 136
15 February 2012 at 7:21pm | IP Logged 
I have about 24 hours with my target language now. I was listening to some material last night, and I've noticed a perception shift. It's really wonderful. The things that seemed so fast and incomprehensible are really more accessable now.
1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6597 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 76 of 136
15 February 2012 at 11:52pm | IP Logged 
Bao wrote:

Just wanted to ask for a heads up on the percentages I thought I'd use for different
activities:
Watching movies/TV shows without subs/with target language subs: 50% of the runtime, no
extra time awarded for looking up words, taking notes etc
What, why? Below a certain level looking up/making notes will have a much higher efficiency ratio than just watching the movie.

Idek, I just make sure to look at the clock from time to time and then I estimate exactly how much of the time I was focused enough.

For English though, I just count things I need motivation for (especially uni stuff) and things I want to keep track of. For example, I don't count watching football in English though it's my most important activity in several languages.

When I choose how much time to count I just start writing a tweet. If I'm overestimating I feel guilty and reduce the number.



I don't quite understand what's the problem with subtitles. Sure LR counts as 100%? I suggest using subtitles in another fluent language:) This way whatever time you spend away from L3 should still count as time spent learning languages.

And it's definitely not exactly the same thing. For example: if I see a shiny bottle of shampoo with text in various languages and randomly feel like reading the Croatian text, I'll struggle a little but understand. If an English native speaker learning Croatian reads the same very text, it may be pretty much like intensive reading, and he is pretty much guaranteed to learn more from it than I do. I think he's also more likely than me to add some of the words to his active vocabulary.
And then if I lazily read the text in Finnish, I might not learn anything but it does count as practice.
(No, I don't count the time spent reading the instructions to use shampoo. I did obviously count the GLOSS lesson on instructions for taking medication, though.)

Edited by Serpent on 16 February 2012 at 12:10am

1 person has voted this message useful



Jeffers
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4909 days ago

2151 posts - 3960 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Hindi, Ancient Greek, French, Sanskrit, German

 
 Message 77 of 136
16 February 2012 at 1:15am | IP Logged 
I don't think it pays to get too bogged down with percentages. Pretty soon people will start to say that, for example, studying grammar is worth 70% of having a conversation, or the other way around! I only reduce the time based on the amount of concentration I had on the task.

I do understand reducing the time for things that are more passive, but just pick a simple percentage that would make it comparable to the rest of your tasks, and stick with it. I haven't watched any films or TV as yet, except French in Action, but I have been tempted to watch Bob l'Eponge, for which I suppose I might give myself 50% time.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Jeffers
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4909 days ago

2151 posts - 3960 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Hindi, Ancient Greek, French, Sanskrit, German

 
 Message 78 of 136
16 February 2012 at 1:24am | IP Logged 
aloysius wrote:
In this thread Sprachprofi wrote:
And you should adjust those
time units according to your concentration on the target language - for example, using
Anki for 10 minutes is probably 100% concentration for 10 minutes = 10 minutes.
However, when you're watching a movie for example, part of your concentration is
definitely on the storyline. If you're using native-language subtitles, which distract
even further from the target language, you might award yourself only 30 minutes score
for 2 hours of movie time. You have to judge it yourself because there's no one value
that fits all, and I'm relying on people being honest about this. There are no prizes
for winning after all, they'd only be cheating themselves.


Films are less dense in language than news or audiobooks so that's another reason for
reducing the time.

//aloysius


I looked at this again, and thought to myself that the fact that films are less dense is no reason to score them lower. It could be a reason to rate them higher, because you are able to focus on everything you hear even after it passes. It could be argued that films are better than news or audiobooks because they put the language in a natural context. This is particularly true if you are learning a language primarily for conversation. However, if we begin to argue about the relative worth of various learning methods, we are going to get bogged down in a complicated mess. I'd rather spend my time learning!

So, as I said in the post above, my one rule is going to be overall % of concentration while doing the task.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Hendrek
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4882 days ago

152 posts - 210 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: Persian

 
 Message 79 of 136
16 February 2012 at 2:34am | IP Logged 
Jeffers wrote:
aloysius wrote:
In this thread Sprachprofi wrote:
And you should adjust those
time units according to your concentration on the target language - for example, using
Anki for 10 minutes is probably 100% concentration for 10 minutes = 10 minutes.
However, when you're watching a movie for example, part of your concentration is
definitely on the storyline. If you're using native-language subtitles, which distract
even further from the target language, you might award yourself only 30 minutes score
for 2 hours of movie time. You have to judge it yourself because there's no one value
that fits all, and I'm relying on people being honest about this. There are no prizes
for winning after all, they'd only be cheating themselves.


Films are less dense in language than news or audiobooks so that's another reason for
reducing the time.

//aloysius


I looked at this again, and thought to myself that the fact that films are less dense is no reason to score them lower. It could be a reason to rate them higher, because you are able to focus on everything you hear even after it passes. It could be argued that films are better than news or audiobooks because they put the language in a natural context. This is particularly true if you are learning a language primarily for conversation. However, if we begin to argue about the relative worth of various learning methods, we are going to get bogged down in a complicated mess. I'd rather spend my time learning!

So, as I said in the post above, my one rule is going to be overall % of concentration while doing the task.


Agreed. We all have different reasons and focuses when it comes to the 6WC. I for instance am focusing as much as I can on passive skills deliberately because of an upcoming passive skill exam. So for now, for this purpose, I see watching a movie or reading a news article or listening to a podcast as MORE important and relevant than getting speaking time in, but I'll focus more on the active part later.

I also assign percentages based on how much I was concentrating throughout... Obviously it's just an honor system.

I think the most important aspect of this 6WC concept is the self-motivation through an inherent competitiveness. Just seeing everyone else rack up the hours motivates me to get some more time in, no matter how little... and then it adds up.
2 persons have voted this message useful



zenmonkey
Bilingual Tetraglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6552 days ago

803 posts - 1119 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: EnglishC2*, Spanish*, French, German
Studies: Italian, Modern Hebrew

 
 Message 80 of 136
17 February 2012 at 1:43pm | IP Logged 
I see that some people have over 1200 minutes of language study a day. Someone has even clocked 1500+ minutes in a single day! Amazing!

I wish I was that dedicated and also had access to a 25hr day!

Racking up 20hrs plus a day of study isn't really happening. Or is it?

Edited by zenmonkey on 17 February 2012 at 1:44pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 136 messages over 17 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.7354 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.