58 messages over 8 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
LaughingChimp Senior Member Czech Republic Joined 4700 days ago 346 posts - 594 votes Speaks: Czech*
| Message 57 of 58 16 February 2012 at 10:45pm | IP Logged |
PillowRock wrote:
LaughingChimp wrote:
PillowRock wrote:
Secondly, I've never noticed any additional tenses in Ebonics, just alternate conjugations of tenses that also exist in "standard" English. |
|
|
Seriously? You gave one as an example. "he be doing" does not exist in standard English. |
|
|
That's not a different tense. It's the same tense as "he is doing", just a different conjugation of it.
If you think that those two are genuinely different tenses, could you please explain to me what you think the difference in meaning is? |
|
|
"he is doing" is present continuous, it describes something he is doing right now. "he be doing" is habitual, it describes something he does often or what he usualy does, though not necessarily right now.
1 person has voted this message useful
| PillowRock Groupie United States Joined 4735 days ago 87 posts - 151 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish
| Message 58 of 58 17 February 2012 at 1:01am | IP Logged |
LaughingChimp wrote:
PillowRock wrote:
LaughingChimp wrote:
PillowRock wrote:
Secondly, I've never noticed any additional tenses in Ebonics, just alternate conjugations of tenses that also exist in "standard" English. |
|
|
Seriously? You gave one as an example. "he be doing" does not exist in standard English. |
|
|
That's not a different tense. It's the same tense as "he is doing", just a different conjugation of it.
If you think that those two are genuinely different tenses, could you please explain to me what you think the difference in meaning is? |
|
|
"he is doing" is present continuous, it describes something he is doing right now. "he be doing" is habitual, it describes something he does often or what he usually does, though not necessarily right now. |
|
|
My experience is that the distinction that you're making does not exist in actual usage. I've never known anybody who used "is doing" for actions being performed at the moment and switched to "be doing" for habitual actions. The people who've used "be doing", did so in both of those cases (though some switch back and forth according to the environment that they're in while speaking). The usage really parallels "is doing", what I'm used to seeing called the "present progressive" in English grammar. In fact, the usage that I see (well, hear) is just a different conjugation of "to be" that is used regardless of whether it is being used on its own or as an auxiliary verb.
One could argue that Ebonics conjugation of "to be" has an advantage because it is much less irregular than the standard one.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3047 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|