107 messages over 14 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 4 ... 13 14 Next >>
Thor1987 Groupie Canada Joined 4739 days ago 65 posts - 84 votes Studies: German
| Message 25 of 107 25 February 2012 at 8:33pm | IP Logged |
Population has little to do with a languages value, just look at hindi, it's not even on
the list, yet it's one of the most spoken language on the planet, not the mention it's
impact on the world as a whole.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Марк Senior Member Russian Federation Joined 5061 days ago 2096 posts - 2972 votes Speaks: Russian*
| Message 26 of 107 25 February 2012 at 8:38pm | IP Logged |
Latin is widely studied, while it doesn't have native speakers.
1 person has voted this message useful
| nway Senior Member United States youtube.com/user/Vic Joined 5420 days ago 574 posts - 1707 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean
| Message 27 of 107 26 February 2012 at 1:00am | IP Logged |
Марк wrote:
Anyway, we have to count GDP with PPP. |
|
|
I specifically used nominal GDP because people tend to study the languages of richer countries (hence why the Scandinavian languages are so popular, relative to their small number of speakers), and the higher valuation of a nominal GDP accounts for this effect.
Марк wrote:
GDPs are changing every year. |
|
|
And so are languages' popularity. Germany's popularity has exploded in recent years, as German has fared exceedingly better than its neighbors through the EU debt crisis. I'm sure I needn't point out the likewise explosion of interest in Chinese over the past decade.
Quote:
Latin is widely taught in the USA, what GDP s related to this language? |
|
|
Latin is a more academic pursuit, studied by most students for the same reasons as piano and chemistry. It really isn't comparable to other living languages, and it's a one-of-a-kind exception either way.
Merv wrote:
The population of German and Chinese speakers is also substantially larger than Khmer and Azerbaijani speakers, and objectively the former two cultures have had a far more profound and far-ranging impact on world culture/civilization/history than the latter two. |
|
|
Yes, and their economies have likewise been bigger. Germany has always had the largest GDP in its region, and historically China has always had the largest GDP in its region. If Cambodia and Azerbaijan had trillion-dollar economies, you could be sure Khmer and Azerbaijani would be studied as well.
Merv wrote:
Western intellectuals and linguists have been learning Chinese for centuries before China's relatively recent re-ascent to world power status. |
|
|
China's share of world GDP was MUCH larger in the past than it is now or will be over the next few decades. This coincides perfectly with you pointing out that intellectuals and linguists studied its language centuries ago (when it was the reigning economic hegemon of East Asia).
Merv wrote:
Likewise, East Asian intellectuals have been learning German for centuries because of Germany's role in European culture and history. |
|
|
And Germany's role in culture and history would be nothing if it didn't have a corresponding economy. You seem to think that I'm implying that economic influence is the reason these languages are studied. I'm not. I'm saying it's an indicator, as well as a prerequisite for the other factors that you mention.
Merv wrote:
Neither group has been doing much to learn Azerbaijani or Khmer. |
|
|
Precisely. And it's certainly not because Azerbaijan and Cambodia don't have culture. It's because they're not as influential, and influence is a consequence of economic weight. Money makes the world go 'round.
Merv wrote:
Russian is being learned for good reasons that have nothing to do with GDP. |
|
|
Yes, we all know. But do you think this is because Russian culture is superior to Polish or Georgian culture? No, it's because Russia is more influential, and this is a direct consequence of its greater measurable economic scale.
Edited by nway on 26 February 2012 at 1:06am
6 persons have voted this message useful
| Марк Senior Member Russian Federation Joined 5061 days ago 2096 posts - 2972 votes Speaks: Russian*
| Message 28 of 107 26 February 2012 at 6:55am | IP Logged |
No, it's because Russia is more influential, and this is a direct consequence of its
greater measurable economic scale.
Russian is more widely spoken and has many more second language speakers. Russian will
help you in Poland and Georgia, but Georgian and Polish will give you nothing in
Russia.
And so are languages' popularity. Germany's popularity has exploded in recent years, as
German has fared exceedingly better than its neighbors through the EU debt crisis. I'm
sure I needn't point out the likewise explosion of interest in Chinese over the past
decade.
I'm sure there was no any increase of the number of German learners in the last years.
German has been widely taught for centuries in Russia despite any economic situation,
so has French.
5 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6602 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 29 of 107 26 February 2012 at 11:41am | IP Logged |
Марк wrote:
I'm sure there was no any increase of the number of German learners in the last years.
German has been widely taught for centuries in Russia despite any economic situation,
so has French. |
|
|
Yeah this.
Among the people I know outside this forum, the main reason seems to be German music nowadays. And a desire to immigrate, without any specific plans.
Also in many cases it's a situation of needing to choose between German and French. Many pick German because they've heard the French pronunciation and orthography are difficult.
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Mad Max Tetraglot Groupie Spain Joined 5056 days ago 79 posts - 146 votes Speaks: Spanish*, French, English, Russian Studies: Arabic (classical)
| Message 30 of 107 26 February 2012 at 11:45am | IP Logged |
If we want to know which languages are important, I would add the concept of "key
language":
It is a language useful because it is spoken (or at least understood) in a big area, by
a lot of people, and English is not very studied there.
For example, Chinese (China), Spanish (Latin America), Russian (former USSR) and Arabic
(Arabic World) are key languages in the World.
In Europe, a Germanic language, a Romance language and a Slavic one can be considered
"key languages".
So, if you speak English, Spanish (or French) and Russian, you can be understood by
almost all Europeans, in different degrees.
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Sennin Senior Member Bulgaria Joined 6039 days ago 1457 posts - 1759 votes 5 sounds
| Message 31 of 107 26 February 2012 at 1:42pm | IP Logged |
Itikar wrote:
I firmly believe anyway, that a language like Dutch can be 100 times more scary than Russian. And even the other Slavic languages, included Bulgarian, seem me more scary too. |
|
|
As native speaker of Italian, the phonetics of Bulgarian should be a piece of cake for you ( and the opposite is also true ). And grammar is just like English grammar, so you don't have to worry about that either ;-p.
I think Russian is very interesting from the point of view of literature, and I have some vague plans of studying it as a dead language, sort of like a Slavic version of Latin. However, I'm not sure it's worth the investment in time to study pronunciation, practice speaking and so on. I can't see how that can fit in my life.
Edited by Sennin on 26 February 2012 at 1:49pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| Марк Senior Member Russian Federation Joined 5061 days ago 2096 posts - 2972 votes Speaks: Russian*
| Message 32 of 107 26 February 2012 at 2:41pm | IP Logged |
Sennin wrote:
Itikar wrote:
I firmly believe anyway, that a language like Dutch can
be 100 times more scary than Russian. And even the other Slavic languages, included
Bulgarian, seem me more scary too. |
|
|
As native speaker of Italian, the phonetics of Bulgarian should be a piece of cake for
you ( and the opposite is also true ). |
|
|
Including soft consonants and vowel reduction?
And grammar is just like English grammar, so you don't have to worry about that either
;-
p.
???
sort of like a Slavic version of Latin.
What does it mean?
Edited by Марк on 26 February 2012 at 2:43pm
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.4688 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|