|
 |
Moving from B2 to C2 | ||
Tags: Advanced Level | Learning Strategy | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion |  | |
| robarb Nonaglot Senior Member United States languagenpluson Joined 5058 days ago 361 posts - 921 votes  Speaks: Portuguese, English*, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, French Studies: Mandarin, Danish, Russian, Norwegian, Cantonese, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Greek, Latin, Nepali, Modern Hebrew | Message 137 of 177 24 February 2015 at 4:46am | IP Logged | |||||
Here in the USA, we say "taking a piss." The guy must've just picked it up without realizing it was a regionalism. I don't think (and I don't think s_allard is saying) that the key is to use idioms more or to know more idioms. The idea is that using them correctly and when appropriate makes you seem like a significantly more skilled language user. As a caveat though, there are wide differences across languages and across speakers within a language in how often they use idioms. You can definitely be a C2 speaker or a native speaker while usually preferring straightforward expressions over their idiomatic synonyms when there's a choice. Then there are of course other subtleties of language such as playing with connotations, humor, and using differences in intonation to convey slight meaning differences. These things are all important in much the same way idioms are: while not all native speakers use all of them all the time, you need to have some ability to use them to be a true C2 (although in practice tests may not require them), and that ability mostly comes from massive exposure to the relevant subtleties plus opportunities to put it in practice. I do want to add that the argument about massive exposure does not claim that it is guaranteed to work. Many people have enough exposure, yet persist in errors and so never reach C2. That isn't a strong argument against massive input, since there is no known method to reliably get an adult learner to C2 regardless of talent and motivation. All have a certain dropout/failure/plateau-at-basic-fluency rate. 2 persons have voted this message useful | ||||||
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5429 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish | Message 138 of 177 24 February 2015 at 8:13am | IP Logged | |||||
|
I certainly don't want to start an argument over the use and abuse of idioms and clichés. I'm only
saying that high or native-like proficiency implies the ability to play with the language to some extent. This is how native speakers use language. The Oral Proficiency Interview from Language Testing International, probably the largest testing organization, lasts 30-45 minutes. What we do know is that within a few minutes into the test, the examiner probably has a good idea of the proficiency level of the examinee. The examiner will ask a simple question like: What did you do last weekend? Let's try to imagine how a C2 speakers would answer this question. This by the way is a great way to see how the speaker can handle past tenses. What makes the examiner immediately say, "Wow, this speaker sounds like a C2." Obviously, great pronunciation, fluency and good grammar are paramount. But what the examiner also notices is detail and sophistication of description and narration. And the choice of words appropriate to the context. Idiomatic expressions, as we all know, are simply two or more words with a meaning that is not easily derived from the individual words. All languages are full of them. Idioms are not always tired old clichés like "raining cats and dogs". In modern informal American speech, a common idiom is "what's up?". This, and the other details that robarb mentioned demonstrate control of the language. This is what the examiner is looking for. 2 persons have voted this message useful | ||||||
| mrwarper Diglot Winner TAC 2012 Senior Member Spain forum_posts.asp?TID=Registered users can see my Skype Name Joined 5225 days ago 1493 posts - 2500 votes Speaks: Spanish*, EnglishC2 Studies: German, Russian, Japanese | Message 139 of 177 24 February 2015 at 10:22am | IP Logged | |||||
What, modern idioms that probably predate 1950? Just joking :) Most of the time, I trust examiners to know their stuff, but how many idioms or when are they used is a somewhat risky measurement of proficiency... First, it is automatic that 'C1' usually means 'considerably above B2 but not C2 yet' (so any CEFR level certification is more of a lower limit), but because C2 is the last level defined, it is the one that admits most variation: The day my little brother and I sat our C2 test, we chatted with a lady during one of the breaks. She asked us how many times we had sat the test, because it was her third, which we found as disturbing as shocking, and which should be as revealing. During our conversation we noticed, as you can imagine, that the worst of us would run circles around that woman, but she passed too so officially we're all at the same level.
Exactly, which is why being a native or a foreign speaker should mean nothing in that context: I know many natives who use idioms too much, clumsily, wrongly, or at inappropriate times, and who we can safely assume would pass a C2 test. I have the strong impression that foreign speakers would generally get considerably more bashing for the same mistakes, though. Edited by mrwarper on 24 February 2015 at 10:39am 5 persons have voted this message useful | ||||||
| patrickwilken Senior Member Germany radiant-flux.net Joined 4532 days ago 1546 posts - 3200 votes Studies: German | Message 140 of 177 24 February 2015 at 11:38am | IP Logged | |||||
|
At least in English there are lots of very specific cultural idioms. Australians tend to use 'beautiful/awesome" a lot, which works fine if you use it with a certain segment of the population, but sounds totally false when used with anyone else.
In London my wife picked up the expression "that's absolutely bonkers" which she would use all the time, and always made me smile as it sounded so odd, and suddenly non-fluent to non-British ears (if she had said it with a full English accent it might have been OK). I had another German friend here in Berlin who started using "it's not my cup of tea", which also sounded just wrong. From my own experience there are lots of cases where people who use idioms slightly wrongly sound far less native, than if they just spoke normally without their use. In this way idioms emphasis that they aren't native speakers. In my mind idioms are one of the few things you don't have to worry about as a language learner. You'll pick them up naturally just from continual language use, and if you force their use too soon, you will almost certainly miss use them, perhaps in meaning, but more likely in frequency or context. 7 persons have voted this message useful | ||||||
| tarvos Super Polyglot Winner TAC 2012 Senior Member China likeapolyglot.wordpr Joined 4706 days ago 5310 posts - 9399 votes Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish | Message 141 of 177 24 February 2015 at 2:06pm | IP Logged | |||||
They do, but that's only a small amount of the mistakes you can potentially make. Most of the time it's just wrong. 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6596 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish | Message 142 of 177 24 February 2015 at 4:25pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
I meant deliberate creativity though, not trying to pass off the usual mistakes as that.
1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5429 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish | Message 143 of 177 24 February 2015 at 4:36pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
On this question of idioms, maybe we should look at how important idiomatic language is modern
everyday speech. Collocations would probably qualify as idioms. Many uses of English phrasal verbs are idiomatic. Most speakers of English know the expressions "a white elephant" or "an elephant in the room". Every American television program is full of examples of idiomatic English. Just today in the program The Good Wife, I heard the following lines: - Every firm is going to come out of the woodwork trying to get their hooks into you. - Eli, you are so counting your chickens. Nearly every adult native speaker of American English understands these idioms but not everyone uses them. That is what high proficiency means. Some idioms you use, some you don't but they are pervasive in the language. 2 persons have voted this message useful | ||||||
| robarb Nonaglot Senior Member United States languagenpluson Joined 5058 days ago 361 posts - 921 votes Speaks: Portuguese, English*, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, French Studies: Mandarin, Danish, Russian, Norwegian, Cantonese, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Greek, Latin, Nepali, Modern Hebrew | Message 144 of 177 24 February 2015 at 5:29pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
I see idioms going into four categories:
1. Obligatory collocations that can't be derived from the individual words: "on my way," "give up," "how are you?" 2. Idiomatic expressions that one is expected to know and use, but could avoid using without sounding wrong: "counting on you," "all over the place," "draw the line." 3. Idiomatic expressions that a native speaker is likely to know, but almost certainly are outside the range of what one would be expected to do in a C2 test: "give the heebie-jeebies," "for sh*ts and giggles," "cramp someone's style." 4. Tired clichés everyone knows but no one says (your speech community may vary): "I'll eat my hat!" "It's raining cats and dogs," "an apple a day keeps the doctor away." (1) must be learned even for basic fluency. Using (2) appropriately will go a long way toward making the transition to C2, although they are optional in any particular case. (3-4) are not necessary, although they'll occasionally help with comprehension, and you can add a few of them to your active vocabulary as a stylistic choice if you so wish. Edited by robarb on 24 February 2015 at 5:30pm 5 persons have voted this message useful |
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
