Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Why English is hard to learn

  Tags: Difficulty | English
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
84 messages over 11 pages: 1 24 5 6 7 ... 3 ... 10 11 Next >>
Sulis
Groupie
United Kingdom
Joined 6452 days ago

60 posts - 66 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French

 
 Message 17 of 84
10 April 2007 at 8:53am | IP Logged 
ColdBlue wrote:
# The bandage was wound around the wound.
-- Who the hell speaks like this? ...more like "The bandage was wrapped around the wound."
# The rubbish dump was so full that it had to refuse more refuse.
-- I can't even figure out how the pronounce the 2nd refuse, looked it up in the dictionary... I would of just said table scraps/food.
# The insurance was invalid for the invalid.
-- No one would ever say that... more like crippled/handicapped person.
# A seamstress and a sewer fell down into a sewer line.
-- I never heard of a seamstress or anyone using the word sewer other than its regular meaning.
# To help with planting, the farmer taught his sow to sow.
-- OK, what the hell, sow is an adult female hog? Never heard of that.

Well, no one talks like that! English is an easy language, people with English degrees just have nothing better to do then try to say English is hard, lol. I remember back in high school a teacher told the class that English was the hardest language to learn.


Actually, people certainly do use these words. I'm very surprised you needed to look them up in a dictionary.
1 person has voted this message useful



justinwilliams
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 6690 days ago

321 posts - 327 votes 
3 sounds
Speaks: French*, EnglishC2
Studies: German, Italian

 
 Message 18 of 84
10 April 2007 at 9:38am | IP Logged 
````Let's face it - English is a crazy language. There is no egg in eggplant, nor ham in hamburger; neither apple nor pine in pineapple. English muffins weren't invented in England or French fries in France. Sweetmeats are candies while sweetbreads, which aren't sweet, are meat.
We take English for granted.. But if we explore its paradoxes, we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig. And why is it that writers write but finge rs don't fing, grocers don't groce and hammers don't ham? If the plural of tooth is teeth, why isn't the plural of booth, beeth? One goose, 2 geese. So one moose, 2 meese? One index, 2 indices? Doesn't it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend? If you have a bunch of odds and ends and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?
If teachers taught, why didn't preachers praught? If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat? Sometimes I think all the English speakers should be committed to an asylum for the verbally in sane. In what language do people recite at a play and play at a recital? Ship by truck and send cargo by ship? Have noses that run and feet that smell? How can a slim chance and a fat chance be the same, while a wise man and a wise guy are opposites? You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language in which your house can burn up as it burns down, in which you fill in a form by filling it out and in which, an alarm goes off by going on.
English was invented by people, not computers, and it reflects the creativity of the human race, which, of course, is not a race at all. That is why, when the stars are out, they are visible, but when the lights are out, they are invisible.
PS. - Why doesn't "Buick" rhyme with "quick"? "````

Certainly interesting features but...

Any of this makes sense. Why dOWN isn't about owning? Why wITh isn't about IT? Why rACE isn't about ACE? And for the rest it's called conjugating. Why not make everything identical? It'd probably be easy to understand! One language=one sound! It makes perfect sense, or does it?



1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 7157 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 19 of 84
10 April 2007 at 9:54am | IP Logged 
When planning a language or working on a "conlang", people can impose their ideas about logic, regularity and so on. However, no language that I know of can be perfectly regular unless it's created and standardized from the beginning by one person or a minority of academics.

Not even notoriously purist languages can do very much since the best that language academies can do is to decelerate the pace of change (or in some cases accelerate it toward some chimera called "proper language"). The languages that academies oversee have been in flux for centuries before a bunch of language geeks (sorry, there's no other way around it) for whatever reason decided that they didn't like what they heard and read coming from the mouths and hands of other speakers of the same language.
1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 7157 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 20 of 84
10 April 2007 at 10:03am | IP Logged 
iieee wrote:
Chung wrote:


How about the words that are spelled differently but pronounced in the same way?

tale vs. tail
mail vs. male
bear vs. bare
seller vs. cellar


Yeah, I forget the technical word for this at the moment but again, I can't imagine that could not be confusing as a beginning language student.

What makes English like this? Is it the fact that it's a mongrel language?


One of my professors once told me that many words (e.g. tale) still reflect the spelling of older forms of English and were indeed pronounced as their spellings suggest (e.g. 'ta-leh' rather than 'tay-ill'). Over time, the pronunciation of 'tale' merged with 'tail' but the spelling didn't change to reflect the change in pronunciation. Presumably, keeping different spellings in this case would help make it clear in writing whether we are talking about the hind end of an animal or someone's story, even though there's no longer a difference in speech.
1 person has voted this message useful



Zelaia
Tetraglot
Newbie
El Salvador
Joined 6810 days ago

29 posts - 37 votes
Speaks: Spanish*, FrenchC1, English, Portuguese
Studies: Kurdish

 
 Message 21 of 84
10 April 2007 at 12:22pm | IP Logged 
French has a lot of homonymes, they can be found even in everyday French (not so often). Here you have an example (which is not everyday French)

Si six scies scient six cyprès, six-cent-six scies scient six-cent-six cyprès.

Un sot monte sur un cheval, en tenant de main droite un seau d'eau, et de la main gauche, le sceau du roi. Durant sa course, le cheval fait un saut qu'il rate.... Du coup, les trois "so" tombent...( le sot, le seau, et le sceau ).




1 person has voted this message useful



Marc Frisch
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6666 days ago

1001 posts - 1169 votes 
Speaks: German*, French, English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Italian
Studies: Persian, Tamil

 
 Message 22 of 84
10 April 2007 at 1:19pm | IP Logged 
And of course the classic:

Gall, amant de la Reine, alla, tour magnanime,
Galamment de l'arène à la tour Magne à Nîmes.


1 person has voted this message useful



ColdBlue
Groupie
Angola
Joined 6574 days ago

40 posts - 41 votes
Speaks: English*
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 23 of 84
10 April 2007 at 7:44pm | IP Logged 
Chung wrote:

I'm surprised at ColdBlue's ignorance of relatively common words. For example, "sow" is indeed used in the USA. Have you ever heard of barbequed sow bellies? I first heard of the idea/recipe in the good 'ol USA.


Sow is a common word? Do you live on a farm? None of those words I picked out are common! I just asked a bunch of my good friends and it was the same deal with them... and were all about to graduate college :-(
1 person has voted this message useful



leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6551 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 24 of 84
10 April 2007 at 9:10pm | IP Logged 
ColdBlue wrote:
I just asked a bunch of my good friends and it was the same deal with them... and were all about to graduate college :-(

I doubt it. All of those words are common. Are you really a native speaker? Do you listen to the news? Read the paper? What's your major?


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 84 messages over 11 pages: << Prev 1 24 5 6 7 8 9 10 11  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3438 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.