Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

The last language you would want to learn

  Tags: Usefulness
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
346 messages over 44 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 30 ... 43 44 Next >>
irrationale
Tetraglot
Senior Member
China
Joined 6051 days ago

669 posts - 1023 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Mandarin, Tagalog
Studies: Ancient Greek, Japanese

 
 Message 233 of 346
22 June 2010 at 2:03pm | IP Logged 
chucknorrisman wrote:
 English has the largest vocabulary due to indiscriminate and careless borrowing from Latin, Greek, and French. That is also one of the reasons for its ridiculous spelling irregularities.


..as well as the slight differences in shades of meaning between all those synonyms that makes it expressive.
2 persons have voted this message useful



j0nas
Triglot
Groupie
Norway
Joined 5543 days ago

46 posts - 70 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, German

 
 Message 234 of 346
22 June 2010 at 6:23pm | IP Logged 
It's not the language itself, it's the user.

Hamsun, Dostoyevsky and Mann can outexpress (is this a word) any English writing author
any day on the week.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Tally
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Israel
Joined 5609 days ago

135 posts - 176 votes 
Speaks: English*, Modern Hebrew*
Studies: French

 
 Message 235 of 346
22 June 2010 at 6:30pm | IP Logged 
j0nas wrote:
It's not the language itself, it's the user.

Hamsun, Dostoyevsky and Mann can outexpress (is this a word) any English writing author
any day on the week.


Of course it's the user, it's like that in every language, some people use it to it's maximum potential and some don't. But it means the language has that potential in the
first place.
1 person has voted this message useful



Juаn
Senior Member
Colombia
Joined 5346 days ago

727 posts - 1830 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*

 
 Message 236 of 346
22 June 2010 at 6:44pm | IP Logged 
j0nas wrote:
It's not the language itself, it's the user.

Hamsun, Dostoyevsky and Mann can outexpress (is this a word) any English writing author
any day on the week.


That's really not something one could ascertain.

Besides, what distinguishes some of those authors are their ideas, not their "expressiveness".
2 persons have voted this message useful



Akao
aka FailArtist
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5337 days ago

315 posts - 347 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Toki Pona

 
 Message 237 of 346
22 June 2010 at 9:37pm | IP Logged 
I don't mind if someone likes English, we all have our tastes in language, I just despise
English. It was fairly good starting out, Old English was alright, I just don't like New
English due to the massive amounts of irregular pronunciations.
2 persons have voted this message useful



apatch3
Diglot
Groupie
United Kingdom
Joined 6186 days ago

80 posts - 99 votes 
Speaks: Pashto, English*
Studies: Japanese, FrenchA2

 
 Message 238 of 346
22 June 2010 at 10:09pm | IP Logged 
Juаn wrote:
j0nas wrote:
It's not the language itself, it's the user.

Hamsun, Dostoyevsky and Mann can outexpress (is this a word) any English writing author
any day on the week.


That's really not something one could ascertain.

Besides, what distinguishes some of those authors are their ideas, not their "expressiveness".


I agree completely, "expressiveness" isn't something that can be measured empirically, people usually find different languages to be more "expressive" and most of the time the language in question is their mother tongue. What I do know, is that English has a vast vocabulary. I grew up speaking it and yet every now and then I'll come across a word that leaves me utterly perplexed. I also know that the internet and the majority of today's literature happens to be in English, if English was an inexpressive language I highly doubt it would have picked up the way it has.


*Poses victoriously* it says A2 next to my name yaaaaay (my first post after giving the DELF A2 today) I know this is completely unrelated to the topic but it feels so good XD.
1 person has voted this message useful



John Smith
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 6043 days ago

396 posts - 542 votes 
Speaks: English*, Czech*, Spanish
Studies: German

 
 Message 239 of 346
23 June 2010 at 2:19am | IP Logged 
j0nas wrote:
no, it isnt


You think that because you don't know how to use the language to express yourself clearly.


English word order is very flexible. We use the passive!!!!!!!

The boy saw the police officer
The police officer was seen by the boy

^^ That's why the passive is used so often. Other languages like Spanish don't use it as often.

What about the difference between

The boy did see the police officer
The boy saw the police officer

^^ I would like to see how over European languages express the difference

I did do it
I did it

2 persons have voted this message useful



chucknorrisman
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5449 days ago

321 posts - 435 votes 
Speaks: Korean*, English, Spanish
Studies: Russian, Mandarin, Lithuanian, French

 
 Message 240 of 346
23 June 2010 at 2:19am | IP Logged 
irrationale wrote:
chucknorrisman wrote:
 English has the largest vocabulary due to indiscriminate and careless borrowing from Latin, Greek, and French. That is also one of the reasons for its ridiculous spelling irregularities.


..as well as the slight differences in shades of meaning between all those synonyms that makes it expressive.

I'm not against borrowing from other languages. I criticized excessive borrowing and careless borrowing. English excessively borrowed from these languages, and that didn't really benefit the language, it just needlessly increased the word roots to learn. People could have just coined new words with existing word roots, and only borrow when necessary. Also, it borrowed carelessly without amending the spellings and that's one of the factors that caused the spelling to be so irregular.

This is one of the problems that Korean also faces; it has excessively and carelessly borrowed from Chinese, and for an effective vocabulary acquisition you have to learn about 1,800 Chinese characters (and you know how tough that is). Making words with native Korean words and borrowing from Chinese only when absolutely necessary would not have caused this problem.

Edited by chucknorrisman on 23 June 2010 at 2:20am



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 346 messages over 44 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3750 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.