61 messages over 8 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next >>
ellasevia Super Polyglot Winner TAC 2011 Senior Member Germany Joined 6141 days ago 2150 posts - 3229 votes Speaks: English*, German, Croatian, Greek, French, Spanish, Russian, Swedish, Portuguese, Turkish, Italian Studies: Catalan, Persian, Mandarin, Japanese, Romanian, Ukrainian
| Message 25 of 61 18 April 2010 at 1:35am | IP Logged |
I have completed the Michel Thomas courses for Italian, German, and Japanese, and am currently working through the Polish one too. I don't have any real complaints about the course and think that it's a really nice and entertaining way to get into a language. In fact, it's a nice way to be able to study when you're on the go or don't have access to the computer or books (if you put it on an MP3 player, which is what I do). The only thing I might bring up is that some of the mistakes that certain students make over and over get a bit annoying (but this can't be helped), and the teacher in the Advanced Japanese course has a really annoying voice.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Kugel Senior Member United States Joined 6537 days ago 497 posts - 555 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 26 of 61 18 April 2010 at 5:47am | IP Logged |
Transcripts embedded with audio, containing prompts where one can type and/or pronounce the answer, are
needed for transparency regarding effectiveness of the material. Even more, such a method would allow future
courses and vocab to be compounded onto each other, making a comprehensive language program viable. The 8
CD and 4 CD sets might be good for making money, but not so for genuine language learning. Just think of all
the wasted time and money that goes into marketing and packaging for sometime as little as 4 or 8 hours of
instruction.
Madrigal's famous Spanish language book is more clever in its way of teaching Spanish than MT's, but it wasn't
done via audio with prompts. Other language books share the same problem. Really, the MT content isn't
mind-blowing stuff if you really look at the big picture and see the transcripts laid out in front of you.
Edited by Kugel on 18 April 2010 at 5:50am
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Cainntear Pentaglot Senior Member Scotland linguafrankly.blogsp Joined 6010 days ago 4399 posts - 7687 votes Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh
| Message 27 of 61 18 April 2010 at 12:19pm | IP Logged |
Kugel, I completely disagree with you. Once you give a student printed material you lose control of the learning process. I firmly believe that at an early stage of learning, the teacher should be in full control to allow the student to start with a firm and unambiguous grounding in the language.
The Thomas course is designed to replicate and replace a language class, not a language textbook.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Kugel Senior Member United States Joined 6537 days ago 497 posts - 555 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 28 of 61 18 April 2010 at 7:54pm | IP Logged |
Caintear, until someone does a study comparing the two methods, can we really say which one is better? We can all
provide reasons for our arguments until the cows come home, but will it really mean anything at the end of the
day? The owners of the MT method are the only ones who are allowed to move the content to a web based
prompt/answer format, which ideally would be full of audio and transcripts. The same goes for Pimsleur or any
audio based program.
And why does it matter if the MT course replicates a class or a book? Both are inferior because class lectures often
don't amount to anything when it comes to activities like languages or Math, as both are meant to be done by the
learner, not the teacher/professor/lecturer. The 2 student:1 teacher ratio just isn't allowed at an educational
institute, at least not a public one. And as for a book, it doesn't allow active participation.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Cainntear Pentaglot Senior Member Scotland linguafrankly.blogsp Joined 6010 days ago 4399 posts - 7687 votes Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh
| Message 29 of 61 18 April 2010 at 9:44pm | IP Logged |
Kugel wrote:
We can all
provide reasons for our arguments until the cows come home, but will it really mean anything at the end of the
day? |
|
|
Go for it.
Give a reason.
3 persons have voted this message useful
| josht Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 6445 days ago 635 posts - 857 votes Speaks: English*, German Studies: French, Spanish, Russian, Dutch
| Message 30 of 61 18 April 2010 at 10:04pm | IP Logged |
I wonder if there is a formula somewhere which shows just how long it takes Cainntear to go on the offensive once "Michel Thomas" shows up in a thread. Beat that poor horse; beat it until it is good and mushy.
8 persons have voted this message useful
| William Camden Hexaglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 6271 days ago 1936 posts - 2333 votes Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Russian, Turkish, French
| Message 31 of 61 19 April 2010 at 1:37pm | IP Logged |
Ajijic10 wrote:
Just out of curiosity, I downloaded the MT demo today and for the life of me, I just don't see the appeal of the program, unless your looking for something that is about 80% English with no native speakers, awful pronunciation, and a method that reminded me of my Spanish class in high-school taught by a nun who didn't speak Spanish. Actually, to be fair, the methodology isn't all that bad (if you're the sort who needs a lot of explanation in order to learn), and he does give you some grammar points in order to be able to produce sentences in the language, but god almighty, the crap you have wade through to find any pearls. The demo is a little over an hour, and I guess if you used Audacity you could get about 10-15 minutes of useful stuff by editing out the two students and most of the English. But you're still left with a teacher whose Spanish pronunciation is mediocre, to be charitable.
In it's defense, it's probably better than Rosetta Stone, and at a much more attractive price point, but hell, you can get FSI for free and at least in my mind, there's no comparison between the two. At least FSI, while mind-numbingly boring, uses native speakers, and I would suspect, covers much more material than MT, although I could be wrong about this because I've never heard the MT Advanced Course. Also, FSI doesn't make you listen to students, at least one of whom is most likely brain damaged.
Anyhow, I certainly don't mean to disparage anyone who uses or likes the course, but after all the hyping done here by a few members, I thought I would see what the fuss was about. I was underwhelmed, to say the least.
|
|
|
FSI covers a lot of material and does use native speakers. As to the boredom, I don't think anyone learned a language or any other intellectual discipline without a certain amount of grim tedium being got through first.
I only have limited experience of MT and was not impressed, but that is perhaps unfair. In the UK at least, MT is marketed at people who don't like writing stuff down, whereas I am a near-obsessive keeper of notebooks etc.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Spanky Senior Member Canada Joined 5955 days ago 1021 posts - 1714 votes Studies: French
| Message 32 of 61 20 April 2010 at 5:22am | IP Logged |
I am a fan of the Michel Thomas courses I have worked through (French and German). In saying this, I include pronunciation issues, which is something that tends to be disparaged concerning Thomas on this board.
I have read a number of comments over the last two years that Thomas may not have as good an accent in various of his languages as the speakers in other audio-based courses like Pimsleur. However, I found it very helpful hearing Thomas correct his student's mispronunciations, as it is a better prompt (for me at least) to question whether I am getting the pronunciation right, especially with the German courses. There is a bit of this in FSI Basic French, where right and wrong pronunciations are presented for contrast in some of the drills, but generally this is not a feature of audio-based courses like Pimsleur.
Edited by Spanky on 20 April 2010 at 5:22am
2 persons have voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|