Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Language competence

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
80 messages over 10 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 10 Next >>
hrhenry
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
languagehopper.blogs
Joined 5129 days ago

1871 posts - 3642 votes 
Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese
Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe

 
 Message 66 of 80
16 November 2010 at 9:52pm | IP Logged 
I'm curious. For those of you that are criticizing the CEFR, have you actually gone and sat any of the exams?

I've gone through it for two languages. Italian, because as an American I had no choice if I wanted to study for a Laurea in the Italian University system, and Spanish for my own personal reasons.

Neither one was geared towards "immigrants" in the sense that Cainntear portrays.

R.
==
2 persons have voted this message useful



Raye
Diglot
Newbie
United States
Joined 5153 days ago

37 posts - 51 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: DutchB1

 
 Message 67 of 80
17 November 2010 at 12:41am | IP Logged 
Very helpful and interesting posts.   I had never heard of the CEFR before I began looking for a target to reach with my Dutch. I was happy to find it, and I’m studying for the next level now.   An exam is no substitute for proving your proficiency by using the language regularly and successfully in the real world. But the CEFR has been very useful to me as a study goal.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Aineko
Triglot
Senior Member
New Zealand
Joined 5447 days ago

238 posts - 442 votes 
Speaks: Serbian*, EnglishC2, Spanish
Studies: Russian, Arabic (Written), Mandarin

 
 Message 68 of 80
17 November 2010 at 6:38pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:

A lot of people here are fluent in several languages but would still fail the A1 criteria
in many of them. The CEFR is designed for immigrant workers, so at A1 you're supposed to
understand job application forms. It progresses through work-related skills (answering
the telephone etc) to being able to discuss "your specialism" (I can't really say much
about IT -- my specialism -- in any of my languages but English) before finally becoming
general.

Is this true? I've never looked at the A1 level, but Spanish and Russian C1 and C2
material are nothing like this. You do have (in Russian, at least) a 'business' version
of a test, if that is what you need, but the 'everyday' version doesn't deal much (if at
all) with job/business.
2 persons have voted this message useful





Fasulye
Heptaglot
Winner TAC 2012
Moderator
Germany
fasulyespolyglotblog
Joined 5846 days ago

5460 posts - 6006 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: German*, DutchC1, EnglishB2, French, Italian, Spanish, Esperanto
Studies: Latin, Danish, Norwegian, Turkish
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 69 of 80
17 November 2010 at 7:39pm | IP Logged 
hrhenry wrote:
I'm curious. For those of you that are criticizing the CEFR, have you actually gone and sat any of the exams?

I've gone through it for two languages. Italian, because as an American I had no choice if I wanted to study for a Laurea in the Italian University system, and Spanish for my own personal reasons.

Neither one was geared towards "immigrants" in the sense that Cainntear portrays.

R.==


Is the CEFR a system to evaluate the language skills (and fluency) of immigrants? I would say partly yes and partly no.

I have sat "Staatexamen Nederlands" NT II (Programma II), which clearly had the target group of immigrants to the Netherlands. In the questionnaire we were asked how long we have already been living in the Netherlands. (Which was a joke in my case because I was living in Germany when I took this exam).

My two English exams with an offical CEFR - level were business related. The target group were all those people who wanted to use English professionally. It was independent of whether the candidates wanted to work in an English-speaking country or use their English language skills to work in Germany.

My three Esperanto exams don't count because they are not connected to any CEFR language levels and there is no Esperantujo to immigrate(!).

Besides this the CEFR language levels are also used for modern textbooks to give the learner an indication of the level which can possibly be obtained after having studied the book.

Fasulye



Edited by Fasulye on 17 November 2010 at 8:23pm

1 person has voted this message useful



noriyuki_nomura
Bilingual Octoglot
Senior Member
Switzerland
Joined 5339 days ago

304 posts - 465 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin*, Japanese, FrenchC2, GermanC2, ItalianC1, SpanishB2, DutchB1
Studies: TurkishA1, Korean

 
 Message 70 of 80
17 November 2010 at 8:17pm | IP Logged 
Take the German exams for instance, the Kleines Deutsches Sprachdiplom and the Goethe Oberstufenprufung, both require candidates to read at least 2 literature books out of a selection of 4 that are published every year, while the Grosses Deutsches Sprachdiplom requires you to read at least 4 (this is an exam which I am preparing now so that I can take it in may 2011). If CEFR exams are meant for immigration purposes, I don't think there's a need to set language exams that test candidates on literature.

Likewise for the DALF C1 and C2 exams, I don't see the point in testing immigrants on argumentative essays such as "write an argumentative essay of at least 500 words on the following: writers of every country should have the right to publish and express themselves freely." Even the DFP Affaires C1 exam which I took in February this year required me to present a verbal presentation on the topic "how does the inflation rate affect unemployment rate in my country and the world", and after your presentation, the examiner would then debate with you the effect of the financial crisis that's affecting the world and that requires you to have a knowledge of financial terms in French. I don't think these exams are really geared towards immigrants.

Edited by noriyuki_nomura on 17 November 2010 at 8:40pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6010 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 71 of 80
17 November 2010 at 8:26pm | IP Logged 
Actually, I may have misunderstood something on the CEFR website.
This doc seems to be official... or is it just an example?

Setting that aside....
It presents "survival language" skills as A1 and A2, but the first year learner in a foreign classroom doesn't need survival skills, and won't benefit much from being taught them, because survival vocab doesn't do much to support learning of the language as a whole.

What I find particularly troublesome is the importance that reading prices and schedules and filling in forms has, because these don't normally require much understanding of the language. I went through some tasks of this form in a Welsh course recently (and now I know why!) and it really didn't strike me as a linguistic challenge, more just decoding symbols. It didn't help me learn the language.

But then the fact that CEFR exams aren't testing this sort of stuff proves that the CEFR is not specific. As I said, it is almost as vague as previous grading systems -- the only difference that we are talking as vaguely as always, but with a shared vocabulary.
1 person has voted this message useful



Sennin
Senior Member
Bulgaria
Joined 6033 days ago

1457 posts - 1759 votes 
5 sounds

 
 Message 72 of 80
17 November 2010 at 8:42pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
The CEFR is designed for immigrant workers, so at A1 you're supposed to understand job application forms. It progresses through work-related skills (answering the telephone etc) to being able to discuss "your specialism" (I can't really say much about IT -- my specialism -- in any of my languages but English) before finally becoming general.


Egh.. this is simply not true. There is very little job related stuff; A1-A2 starts with everyday topics like talking about the weather, talking about people and things. Gradually the topics become more abstract and complex. You're expected to defend a point of view, talk about current problems in society, the environment, social liberties, cultural specifics and so on. If anything, there is too little focus on practical job skills, and quite frankly I find your statement offensive. To say CEFR is for immigrants, is like saying learning languages is for immigrants.

Cainntear wrote:
The CEFR is completely irrelevant to us here. FX has set up his own matrix of "I can" skills here that is also far from perfect, but of far more general applicability than the CEFR.


Perhaps it is irrelevant for you, don't generalize. I find it a good way to structure my studies, and to master both the written and the spoken language.





Edited by Sennin on 17 November 2010 at 8:43pm



2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 80 messages over 10 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 810  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 7.0625 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.