Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Purpose of gender and conjugations

 Language Learning Forum : Advice Center Post Reply
24 messages over 3 pages: 1 2
Lapsus
Newbie
Finland
Joined 6634 days ago

3 posts - 3 votes
Speaks: Finnish*

 
 Message 17 of 24
13 October 2006 at 9:26am | IP Logged 
I, too, hear difference between to and two.
'To' sounds hard, short, and abrupt; and 'two' soft, longer, and lingering.

It is indeed curious that natives can't tell the difference, or so it would seem.



1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6768 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 18 of 24
13 October 2006 at 9:57am | IP Logged 
I think two will be pronounced longer when it's stressed, but vowel length isn't phonemic in English, hasn't been for centuries.
1 person has voted this message useful



Marc Frisch
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6665 days ago

1001 posts - 1169 votes 
Speaks: German*, French, English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Italian
Studies: Persian, Tamil

 
 Message 19 of 24
13 October 2006 at 11:27am | IP Logged 
Captain Haddock wrote:
I think two will be pronounced longer when it's stressed, but vowel length isn't phonemic in English, hasn't been for centuries.


Like in "sheep" and "ship"?
1 person has voted this message useful



Sir Nigel
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7104 days ago

1126 posts - 1102 votes 
2 sounds

 
 Message 20 of 24
13 October 2006 at 2:19pm | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
If you native people say "to two houses", does it then sound like "to to houses" would?


They would be 100 per cent identical for me.

However, just saying "to houses" if a sentence were "if you want to go 'to houses'", then the vowel in "to" would be just schwa anyway.

I think I've pretty much lost what this discussion is about! :)
1 person has voted this message useful



hagen
Triglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6960 days ago

171 posts - 179 votes 
6 sounds
Speaks: German*, English, Mandarin
Studies: Korean

 
 Message 21 of 24
13 October 2006 at 5:09pm | IP Logged 
Marc Frisch wrote:
Captain Haddock wrote:
I think two will be pronounced longer when it's stressed, but vowel length isn't phonemic in English, hasn't been for centuries.


Like in "sheep" and "ship"?


These are different vowels, not only different quantities. For a minimal pairs of quantities check German "a". (Bahn/Bann, Stahl/Stall, ...)
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6768 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 22 of 24
14 October 2006 at 4:06am | IP Logged 
Marc Frisch wrote:
Captain Haddock wrote:
I think two will be pronounced longer when it's stressed, but vowel length isn't phonemic in English, hasn't been for centuries.


Like in "sheep" and "ship"?


Those are different vowels, pronounced in different parts of the mouth. What's more, they have the same vowel duration (at least in my Canadian English).
1 person has voted this message useful



Raincrowlee
Tetraglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6702 days ago

621 posts - 808 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin, Korean, French
Studies: Indonesian, Japanese

 
 Message 23 of 24
14 October 2006 at 4:55am | IP Logged 
Captain Haddock wrote:
I think two will be pronounced longer when it's stressed, but vowel length isn't phonemic in English, hasn't been for centuries.


Funny thing I noticed when teaching English is that I (and I think most English speakers) actually use vowel length to differentiate between voiced and non-voiced syllable final consonants. What I mean is that there is a difference between the vowel lengths of "cap" and "cab". "Cap" is much faster, while "cab" is more drawn out. If you stretch the vowel out, and use the unvoiced consonant, I think most English speakers would hear the voiced final.

Try it yourself, see what you think.

Edited by Raincrowlee on 14 October 2006 at 4:55am

1 person has voted this message useful



SamD
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6659 days ago

823 posts - 987 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, French
Studies: Portuguese, Norwegian

 
 Message 24 of 24
14 October 2006 at 10:10am | IP Logged 
I suspect that many native speakers of American English practically swallow the word "to," particularly when it's part of an infinitive.

I checked my Webster's Collegiate Dictionary this morning, and it gives the same pronunciation for "too" and "two." It's /tu/ with an umlaut over the "u," the same vowel sound in "loot." That same pronunciation is one of the three given for "to" as well.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 24 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 1 2

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4844 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.