Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Motivations for becoming a polyglot

  Tags: Polyglot
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
60 messages over 8 pages: 1 2 3 46 7 8 Next >>


emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5531 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 33 of 60
04 October 2013 at 7:01pm | IP Logged 
Retinend wrote:
Juаn wrote:
Being a voracious reader... and having an interest in many subjects from literature to philosophy not just in a contemplative but in an active sense ...implies discovering sooner or later that "languages are the first duty of the intellectual".

Why does it imply that? Does "the intellectual" eventually run out of books to read in her language?

If our hypothetical intellectual was raised speaking the standard dialect of a major world language, a language with a long and respectable written tradition, then it's often possible to be both a monoglot and an intellectual.

But tons of smart, intellectually-active people have grown up in other circumstances. For example, they may:

1) Speak the wrong dialect of a prestigious language, so everyone assumes they're stupid.
2) Speak a medium-sized language where half the important books never get translated.
3) Speak a small language where only the Bible gets translated.
4) Live 500 years after the collapse of a major empire, and so all serious intellectual work takes place in a dead language.
5) Live in a society that quotes long, untranslated passages in books.
6) Live in a society where it's assumed that any self-respecting intellectual reads either Latin, classical Chinese, Modern Standard Arabic or perhaps Middle Egyptian.

So if you look at the last 4,500 years of human history, an "intellectual" has almost always meant, "Somebody who reads and writes another, much more important language or two." Except when it meant, "Somebody who has a memorized a major saga or the legal code." And this is true even today: Plenty of people in this world find it hard to study advanced or esoteric topics without being able to read English or least one of the other big languages. And monolingual English speakers do miss out on a lot, too.
10 persons have voted this message useful



Jeffers
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4908 days ago

2151 posts - 3960 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Hindi, Ancient Greek, French, Sanskrit, German

 
 Message 34 of 60
04 October 2013 at 7:01pm | IP Logged 
I'm not sure if I will ever be good enough at my languages to call myself a polyglot. But I keep studying languages because my brain wants to learn.
2 persons have voted this message useful



lichtrausch
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5959 days ago

525 posts - 1072 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Japanese
Studies: Korean, Mandarin

 
 Message 35 of 60
04 October 2013 at 8:51pm | IP Logged 
Juаn wrote:
"languages are the first duty of the intellectual".

The first duty of a certain strand of intellectual, like one concentrating on literature and philosophy.

I think the main goal of an intellectual has always been to understand the universe and our place within it. For most of human history, the known universe was severely constrained by the limits of human perception, so the grand scale of the actual universe as well as the molecular world was hidden from us. The universe appeared to revolve around humans and gods, so it was only rational for the intellectual to direct most of his energies towards philosophy, history, theology and maybe literature. Conveniently, there were great imperial languages that held the entire knowledge of these grand traditions, so an intellectual in Europe, Central Asia, South Asia or East Asia needed only to learn the one or two grand languages of their civilization.

Enter the modern world, where our knowledge of the universe has been exponentially expanded by telescopes, microscopes and giants such as Newton and Einstein. Anyone with an intellectual bent has the incredible fortune of access to a stupendous wealth of knowledge about the universe on a cosmic, quantum, molecular and human scale. But the intellectual must now be very selective about what he learns, since the human lifespan is but a fleeting moment in comparison with this trove of knowledge.

In my opinion, the first duties of the modern intellectual should be English and mathematics. Math and English are the modern languages of science, and science, by a long shot, can tell us the most about the universe and our place within it. I think there is still a place for intellectuals who focus mostly on literature, history and philosophy such as Christopher Hitchens and Marcel Reich-Ranicki, but I believe that those modern intellectuals who become well-versed in science and mathematics (Carl Sagan and Sam Harris come to mind) will be far better equipped to understand, and explain to others, the universe and our place within it.
4 persons have voted this message useful



Juаn
Senior Member
Colombia
Joined 5344 days ago

727 posts - 1830 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*

 
 Message 36 of 60
04 October 2013 at 9:08pm | IP Logged 
"La ciencia no resuelve los problemas que el hombre le plantea, sino los que se plantea a sí misma."
3 persons have voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4843 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 37 of 60
04 October 2013 at 9:46pm | IP Logged 
lichtrausch wrote:
science, by a long shot, can tell us the most about the universe and our place within it.

This is a common misconception. Science can tell us nothing about our place within the universe, but only about the universe itself. Only the human mind can tell us anything about our place within this world.

In other words, we always have to interpret what science tells us. Moreover, science doesn't tell us anything about the real questions what it means to be human.

Yes, I have studied philosophy and I'm proud of it.

Edited by Josquin on 04 October 2013 at 9:53pm

6 persons have voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4706 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 38 of 60
04 October 2013 at 10:14pm | IP Logged 
The problem with that statement is is that there is so much data that science provides
us, so many facts and conclusions, that you really cannot get around science anyways.
Yeah, you have to put a moral layer over it but that's really an obvious thing to do
once you know what you're given to work with in my view.

By the way, if an intellectual means "have to read old and dusty books" and "wear horn-
rimmed glasses" and "drink sophisticated wines" and such, and if intellectuals have
"duties", then I am sure not to be an intellectual. I hope my babbling of several
languages constitutes polyglottery. And if it does not, if the arbitrary criteria for
intellectuality or polyglottery or whatever are not satisfied according to some
academic fashion then so be it.

In my opinion, people should educate themselves whatever way they can. Whether that
satisfies arbitrary "intellectual" criteria or not. Whether they study English or
mathematics, chemistry or headology (or jommetry) isn't really so relevant to me.

Oderint dum metuant....
1 person has voted this message useful



simonov
Senior Member
Portugal
Joined 5588 days ago

222 posts - 438 votes 
Speaks: English

 
 Message 39 of 60
04 October 2013 at 11:23pm | IP Logged 
tarvos wrote:

Oderint dum metuant....

I know what it means, and who said it, but what the heck do you mean by that? None of your reasoning warrants an "oderint dum metuant".
So you don't like Shakespeare, Cervantes, Gil Vicente, François Villon, ...., it's you who's losing out, not those 'old and dusty books'. You prefer babbling in tongues, fine, why not, but don't keep on disparaging the ideas of others who happen to have different expectations.
4 persons have voted this message useful



Lorren
Senior Member
United States
brookelorren.com/blo
Joined 4250 days ago

286 posts - 324 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish, Danish, Irish
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 40 of 60
05 October 2013 at 5:28am | IP Logged 
I doubt that one's visual acuity or taste in alcoholic beverages has anything to do with one's ability to learn about the world. Knowing multiple languages, on the other hand, does open the door to learning new things...


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 60 messages over 8 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 46 7 8  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4053 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.