26 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4 Next >>
Gemuse Senior Member Germany Joined 4080 days ago 818 posts - 1189 votes Speaks: English Studies: German
| Message 1 of 26 21 May 2014 at 8:36pm | IP Logged |
From Ms Diva's log...
"I am yet to get used to watching movies without subtitles"
vs
"I have yet to get used to watching movies without subtitles"
Serpent wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with "I'm yet to get used" |
|
|
Quote:
"I am yet to get used to" sounds wrong, I would have written "I have yet to get used
to".
But perhaps this is more subtle than I thought.
http://forums.tomisimo.org/showthread.php?t=10085
http://www.englishforums.com/English/Versus/djxxm/post.htm
Combing with the implicit intention in the original sentence that the activity has
started, "have" seems natural. |
|
|
Serpent wrote:
I think "have" would work better if Via_Diva was forced to learn English but didn't
care. It emphasizes having no choice. Necessity rather than determination.
Since someone mentioned Jane Austen, I suppose "I'm yet to" is more common in British
English too.
edit: for example, one of the first examples in google is "I'm perfectly aware of what
I'm yet to know". It's just a more eloquent way of saying "what I don't know" and very
different from "what I have to know". It certainly implies a desire to learn more, but
it focuses on the present situation and future plans. |
|
|
Quote:
"I'm yet to know" sounds perfectly fine. Thinking about it, the issue may be
"watching",
ie. "ing" verb in the original sentence.
"I am yet to get used to English movies" sounds perfectly fine
"I am yet to get used to watching movies"...the "have" version sounds better. |
|
|
Edited by Gemuse on 21 May 2014 at 8:55pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| Gemuse Senior Member Germany Joined 4080 days ago 818 posts - 1189 votes Speaks: English Studies: German
| Message 2 of 26 21 May 2014 at 8:38pm | IP Logged |
Serpent wrote:
But watching is a gerund, and it should be interchangeable with any
noun here. If anything, the addition of "watching" makes me prefer "I'm" here, as it's
better than "I've yet to get used", but with the full form of "have" there's too many
auxiliary verbs in one sentence. It's not wrong but it feels clumsy, much like those
sentences with the double perfect.
Also, have is short for "have got", and "I have got to get used" is even more awkward.
|
|
|
Ugh, I know squat about formal English grammar, I just go by the sound.
"I have got to get used" is actually pretty standard, but it has a different meaning
(at least to me), It says that I really desire something. Usually the "got" to is
stressed.
"I have got to get used to waking up early".
And AFAIK the connotation is that I should wake up early, but I am being lazy about it.
Without "got" the connotation changes.
PS: have is short for "have got"? Did not know that.
1 person has voted this message useful
| hrhenry Octoglot Senior Member United States languagehopper.blogs Joined 5128 days ago 1871 posts - 3642 votes Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe
| Message 3 of 26 21 May 2014 at 8:43pm | IP Logged |
Gemuse wrote:
PS: have is short for "have got"? Did not know that. |
|
|
Not necessarily. I think it's down to regional use, more than anything.
R.
==
1 person has voted this message useful
| ScottScheule Diglot Senior Member United States scheule.blogspot.com Joined 5226 days ago 645 posts - 1176 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Latin, Hungarian, Biblical Hebrew, Old English, Russian, Swedish, German, Italian, French
| Message 4 of 26 21 May 2014 at 9:43pm | IP Logged |
The former sounds a bit more archaic to me, sort of like the use of "to be" as a helping verb for certain verbs in the present perfect. Whereas today, we say, "I have come," in older English (like the King James Bible), you'll find "I am come." Much like you find in French.
But both sound fine.
Edited by ScottScheule on 21 May 2014 at 9:44pm
2 persons have voted this message useful
| James29 Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 5373 days ago 1265 posts - 2113 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: French
| Message 5 of 26 21 May 2014 at 10:48pm | IP Logged |
"I am yet to get used to watching movies without subtitles" does not sound right. I don't think "yet" works that way. I would say "I am not yet used to watching movies without subtitles".
"I have yet to get used to watching movies without subtitles" sounds fine.
4 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6595 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 6 of 26 22 May 2014 at 1:46am | IP Logged |
ScottScheule wrote:
The former sounds a bit more archaic to me, sort of like the use of "to be" as a helping verb for certain verbs in the present perfect. Whereas today, we say, "I have come," in older English (like the King James Bible), you'll find "I am come." Much like you find in French.
But both sound fine. |
|
|
It's more like "I'm to do it", meaning "I'm supposed to".
Would you say it's interchangeable in the following contexts?
-I'm yet to come across something like that.
-I have yet to find something like that. (more deliberate and forced, imho)
Edited by Serpent on 22 May 2014 at 1:49am
1 person has voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6595 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 7 of 26 22 May 2014 at 1:59am | IP Logged |
Gemuse wrote:
Ugh, I know squat about formal English grammar, I just go by the sound.
"I have got to get used" is actually pretty standard, but it has a different meaning
(at least to me), It says that I really desire something. Usually the "got" to is
stressed.
"I have got to get used to waking up early".
And AFAIK the connotation is that I should wake up early, but I am being lazy about it.
Without "got" the connotation changes. |
|
|
To me that's the distinction between "I'm yet to" and "I have yet to"/"I've got to". Yeah it's pretty standard, but it sounds awkward with a full form of "have got".
Also (to natives) is there a difference between "I have yet to" and "I still have to"? IMO "I have yet to" is somewhere in between "I'm yet to" and "I still have to" on a modality scale.
Edited by Serpent on 22 May 2014 at 2:16am
1 person has voted this message useful
| s0fist Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 5044 days ago 260 posts - 445 votes Speaks: Russian*, English Studies: Sign Language, German, Spanish, French
| Message 8 of 26 22 May 2014 at 2:38am | IP Logged |
Serpent wrote:
Also (to natives) is there a difference between "I have yet to" and "I still have to"? |
|
|
In the first case you have never done something before.
In the second case you could have done it many times before you just still have to do it.
To illustrate: I have yet to start flossing, but I still have to brush my teeth everyday.
Regarding the original expression, I agree with James:
James29 wrote:
"I am yet to get used to watching movies without subtitles" does not sound right. I don't think "yet" works that way. I would say "I am not yet used to watching movies without subtitles".
"I have yet to get used to watching movies without subtitles" sounds fine. |
|
|
I wouldn't necessarily call "I am yet to get used to" ungrammatical or even archaic, it just sounds weird.
2 persons have voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 26 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4 Next >>
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.4844 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|