Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Free Speech - learn like a child?

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
13 messages over 2 pages: 1


Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6706 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 9 of 13
20 December 2014 at 5:32pm | IP Logged 
The plan sketched out in the TED talk seems to me to be rather naive. It reminds me of the attempts to create a truly logical language - nothing worthwhile ever came out of those experiments, in spite of the time spent on such projects by intellectual giants like Leibniz. From an other angle it sounds like the belief that you can do the work of field linguists by letting amateurs use a computer program based on Google translate crossbred with a graphics program. But let them try...
2 persons have voted this message useful



Via Diva
Diglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
last.fm/user/viadivaRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4237 days ago

1109 posts - 1427 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German, Italian, French, Swedish, Esperanto, Czech, Greek

 
 Message 10 of 13
20 December 2014 at 5:44pm | IP Logged 
Iversen, of course it's naive, but I do not trust it blindly (especially without having tried anything). Like
I've said, I hardly believe it can guide a learner too far, but perhaps it can help learn the basics - one of the
hardest steps to make in any language - from a different POV.
1 person has voted this message useful



Doitsujin
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5323 days ago

1256 posts - 2363 votes 
Speaks: German*, English

 
 Message 11 of 13
20 December 2014 at 7:47pm | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
The plan sketched out in the TED talk seems to me to be rather naive. It reminds me of the attempts to create a truly logical language - nothing worthwhile ever came out of those experiments, in spite of the time spent on such projects by intellectual giants like Leibniz. From an other angle it sounds like the belief that you can do the work of field linguists by letting amateurs use a computer program based on Google translate crossbred with a graphics program. But let them try...


I'm also rather skeptical. However, a similar concept, Blissymbols, was successfully used to help children with cerebral palsy communicate.
2 persons have voted this message useful



patrickwilken
Senior Member
Germany
radiant-flux.net
Joined 4536 days ago

1546 posts - 3200 votes 
Studies: German

 
 Message 12 of 13
20 December 2014 at 8:00pm | IP Logged 
Doitsujin wrote:

I'm also rather skeptical. However, a similar concept, Blissymbols, was successfully used to help children with cerebral palsy communicate.


But communicating and learning a language are two different things. I have no doubt that this might help some autistic kids communicate better - at least with a simplified grammar - but I just don't get how this could help me learn my L2 (though you are probably not suggesting that anyway).
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6706 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 13 of 13
21 December 2014 at 3:15pm | IP Logged 
I actually do believe that it might help autistic kids to communicate better. It leaves out the human interaction which for some of those kids is more of a problem than a help, and you cancel out many of the intricacies and vagaries of natural languages when you let a machine take over the communication. But precisely that - plus the inherent limitations of pictures and symbols - is why I'm sceptical about the plan when it comes to learning real natural languages as spoken by us unpredictable humans.

Edited by Iversen on 21 December 2014 at 3:18pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 13 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.8910 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.