Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Why Germanic languages are generally...

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
29 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3
Henkkles
Triglot
Senior Member
Finland
Joined 4252 days ago

544 posts - 1141 votes 
Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 25 of 29
17 November 2014 at 4:16pm | IP Logged 
Cristianoo wrote:
Well, I don't understand why a language cannot be mesured as more or less difficult to
learn.

They can, this is not what the conversation was about. Besides this is entirely dependant on everyone's linguistical background, there is no universal value of difficulty for languages.

Cristianoo wrote:
For me it's simple: How predictable it is and how much rules it require to master it's
grammar.

Yeah that would be simple if there was any way whatsoever to quantify predictability and calculating numbers of rules to master any grammar...

Cristianoo wrote:
So, if a language has a huge but consistent grammar, it still can be complex (because
it will take you a lot of time to learn the rules and you will probably forget most of
them)

And if a language has an easy but weak grammar with a lot of exceptions, then it is
also complex, because the rules cannot be used to create words as you need when you
still dont know them

This is precisely why saying one language is harder than another is a complete fool's endeavor...

Cristianoo wrote:
Therefore, what is simple and what is hard? Well...

Its simple when there are few and consistent grammar rules, with few exceptions,
making things predictable and enabling us to construt sentences whenever we want on-
the-fly.

Wouldn't that be something, right?

Cristianoo wrote:
Its hard when it has a lot of rules and most of them are weak (lots of exceptions)

You just described every natural language ever!

Cristianoo wrote:
or
require that you know another language to undestand them, making us crazy most of the
time because we have to have everything in memory in order to speak.

No such language can nor will ever exist. If such a language would exist that would wreck every single theory that exists about the cognitive aspects of language.

Cristianoo wrote:
You guys may ask: what about alphabet or pronunciation?

You mean "orthography" by "alphabet" and that isn't language; it's only a representation of language. What comes to pronunciation; the "somewhat relative difficulty" of pronunciation is possible to quantify using the simple method; take the phonemic inventory of the language and devise an algorithm to calculate the relative rarity of the sounds present in the language; for example Xhosa has click consonants which are very rare.

Cristianoo wrote:
Those things are tricky, because what is difficult for me can be easy for you. For
example, French pronunciation is easy for me but very hard for japanese people.

This is the definition of relativity.

Cristianoo wrote:
So, they are too "private stuff" and can only be used to mesure how hard a language in
comparison to another.

Eh..?

Cristianoo wrote:

1) We could mesure how hard a language is globally by it's complexity in terms of
grammar

Nope, as there is no way to quantify the complexity of grammar.

Cristianoo wrote:
2) We could mesure how hard a language is comparing it to another in terms of
pronunciation, writting system and lack of loan words/similar vocabulary.

So your assertion is that difficulty is equivalent to the relative time it would take for someone to achieve a working knowledge in the language?

Your views mirror greatly those that a speaker of Standard Average European would have, where wide morphology is seen as "complex" and rigid syntax as "not complex" only because the speakers are used to that. However I still get headaches from Swedish syntax and I consistently mess it up even though Swedish is considered to be an easy language.
5 persons have voted this message useful



tristano
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
Joined 4046 days ago

905 posts - 1262 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, Spanish, French, English
Studies: Dutch

 
 Message 26 of 29
17 November 2014 at 11:48pm | IP Logged 
I'm having difficulties (not extreme) with Dutch because it's the most different language that I studied seriously.
French is fairly easy for me and Spanish a peace of cake.
I read several native English speakers complaining about the Spanish grammar "so difficult".
An indian guy told me that it was very easy for him to learn Dutch but that French is "too difficult".
I never found English particularly easy, and the more I progress the more difficult seems to me.
The Dutchmen in average struggle with French but are very good with English.
Most of the perceived difficulty is tied with the previous knowledge of other languages.
However I read somewhere that the Danish and Arabic children need more time of the others to learn an equivalent
amount of words. Not sure it's true.
1 person has voted this message useful



DaisyMaisy
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5379 days ago

115 posts - 178 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish
Studies: Swedish, Finnish

 
 Message 27 of 29
18 November 2014 at 12:58am | IP Logged 
In my experience, most native English speakers who find Spanish grammar "really difficult" are talking about the different verb endings. Since we don't have nearly so many of those in English, it tends to boggle the mind at first. However, they are fairly consistent and with study they can be learned.

What I find hardest about Spanish (so far) is when the word order goes opposite of how it would in English. Such as, "Me dan el libro". I hear "me" and my brain thinks it is the subject, not the object. I really have to think these type of constructions through and they don't come nearly as easily as learning the verb endings.

Not to digress about my Spanish studies, but I wanted to agree that "complex", "simple", "difficult", "easy", etc. depend on so many factors that it's hard to make generalizations about easy or difficult languages.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Stolan
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4031 days ago

274 posts - 368 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Thai, Lowland Scots
Studies: Arabic (classical), Cantonese

 
 Message 28 of 29
18 November 2014 at 1:05am | IP Logged 
tristano wrote:
I'm having difficulties (not extreme) with Dutch because it's the most different language that I
studied seriously.
French is fairly easy for me and Spanish a peace of cake.
I read several native English speakers complaining about the Spanish grammar "so difficult".
An indian guy told me that it was very easy for him to learn Dutch but that French is "too difficult".
I never found English particularly easy, and the more I progress the more difficult seems to me.
The Dutchmen in average struggle with French but are very good with English.
Most of the perceived difficulty is tied with the previous knowledge of other languages.
However I read somewhere that the Danish and Arabic children need more time of the others to learn an equivalent
amount of words. Not sure it's true.


That's more to due with phonology, not grammar.
Anyway,
We are forgetting one other thing besides phonology and inflection for complexity, derivation.

Forming a single latin quality adjective or noun diminutive is just as inconsistent and unpredictable as forming an
Estonian genitive on top of actual noun irregularities. That isn't to say languages in the rest of the world don't have
some unpredictable derivational categories but none in the sheer quantity found here. I could give comparisons.

But I will settle with one:
With Arabic the consonants K-T-B will take you a long way, Korean and Navajo will get you a diminutive with one or
two suffixes, in Latin prepare to come across half a dozen potential random suffixes for forming a word with the
same imparted meaning.

Edited by Stolan on 18 November 2014 at 1:10am

1 person has voted this message useful



albysky
Triglot
Senior Member
Italy
lang-8.com/1108796Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4387 days ago

287 posts - 393 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, English, German

 
 Message 29 of 29
18 November 2014 at 10:06am | IP Logged 
Are Germanic languages really that "unphonetic " ? German is really phonetic , Dutch should be similar . I
have dabbled a little bit in Swedish and it seemed to be phonetic as well , not as much as German , but
still phonetic . Ok , English is the exeption .

Dutch people are really good at English simply because they are exposed to it from a tender age .
Under the same circumstances also Italians would be very good at it .

Edited by albysky on 18 November 2014 at 10:12am



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 29 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 1 2 3

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4844 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.