Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

More than 6 anyone?

 Language Learning Forum : Polyglots Post Reply
53 messages over 7 pages: 1 2 35 6 7  Next >>
apparition
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6462 days ago

600 posts - 667 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written), French, Arabic (Iraqi), Portuguese, German, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Pashto

 
 Message 25 of 53
13 November 2007 at 8:37pm | IP Logged 
Haha, yeah I know. I actually do like the discussions, it's just that I find myself spending more time reading these threads than I do learning my languages!
1 person has voted this message useful



Bojan
Bilingual Pentaglot
Newbie
Germany
Joined 6036 days ago

35 posts - 35 votes
Speaks: Croatian, Serbian, Slovenian*, German*, English

 
 Message 26 of 53
15 November 2007 at 1:23pm | IP Logged 
The famous polyglots are also telling that these languages are not all the same.
They count Serbian, Croatian, Montenegrin etc. all as different languages.

Edited by Bojan on 15 November 2007 at 1:24pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Henryk
Diglot
Newbie
Germany
Joined 6161 days ago

34 posts - 35 votes
Speaks: German, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Swedish

 
 Message 27 of 53
15 November 2007 at 3:17pm | IP Logged 
Bojan wrote:
The famous polyglots are also telling that these languages are not all the same.

Why doesn't that surprise me?

Edited by Henryk on 15 November 2007 at 3:18pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Chung
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 6968 days ago

4228 posts - 8259 votes 
20 sounds
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Polish, Slovak, Uzbek, Turkish, Korean, Finnish

 
 Message 28 of 53
15 November 2007 at 3:57pm | IP Logged 
Bojan wrote:
The famous polyglots are also telling that these languages are not all the same.
They count Serbian, Croatian, Montenegrin etc. all as different languages.


Indeed, they are not the same. Yet are they different languages?
1 person has voted this message useful



Scott Horne
Newbie
Canada
Joined 6037 days ago

34 posts - 38 votes

 
 Message 29 of 53
15 November 2007 at 4:32pm | IP Logged 
By linguistic criteria, those are a single language. Their minor differences are greatly exaggerated for political reasons.

1 person has voted this message useful



bushwick
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
Joined 6056 days ago

407 posts - 443 votes 
Speaks: German, Croatian*, English, Dutch
Studies: French, Japanese

 
 Message 30 of 53
15 November 2007 at 5:28pm | IP Logged 
Nah, they aren't really exaggerated.
(I live in Croatia, I can tell)

However, I did meet people who were mad about no Croatian subtitles appearing in Serbian movies. Which is just too much.

People sometimes overdo it, as it's somewhat insulting to the people here calling these languages Serbo-Croat. However, all are aware it's practically just different dialects, and will agree upon it if discused.

I mean, it's even a common joke here saying that you know 5 languages: Serbian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Bosnian and Slovenian (Slovenian is largely intelligible to Serbo-Croat speakers)
1 person has voted this message useful



xtremelingo
Trilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 6099 days ago

398 posts - 515 votes 
Speaks: English*, Hindi*, Punjabi*
Studies: German, French, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 31 of 53
15 November 2007 at 7:57pm | IP Logged 
Lloydkirk,

lloydkirk wrote:
Those 'four' native languages could essentially be reduced to two. Hindu and Urdu are the same language, just written in a different script. Urdu speakers can read Punjabi easily and though Punjabi phonology is different, the spoken form is largely intelligible too.    


I guess I have to address this ALL over again. Lloyd, once again you impress me with bold statements that are inaccurate.

Punjabi is written in Gurmukhi script. This script is completely different from Devanagri and Perso-Arabic. The language itself is different.

The spoken form is largely intelligible to those Urdu or Hindi speakers that are PUNJABI. However, there are plenty of Urdu or Hindi speakers that are NOT Punjabi. And for them, Punjabi is NOT intelligible.

Other elements:

#1. Native Hindi *readers*, Native Urdu *readers*, Native Punjabi *readers* can NOT read each other's language. Each of these languages have their OWN script. Comparing them, is like comparing Mandarin to Japanese, Thai to Arabic.

#2. Urdu has plenty of Arabic and Persian. This makes the overall vocabulary of Urdu very different from Hindi. We know that language consists of words and grammar, and vocabulary is a big part of this prerequisite. Urdu vocab can be largely different from Hindi vocab, particularly that of an educated Urdu or Hindi speaker. Otherwise, most Urdu speakers end up speaking what is actually Hindi, because they are not as formally educated or influenced in Urdu. Thanks to Bollywood, this influence makes it even more apparent and compels Urdu speakers to use more Hindi-based words, and not their own native vocab.

Hindi-Urdu-English mix has also become very 'chic' for many urban-dwellers in these countries.

#3. It is completely possible to find Hindi and Urdu speakers that can not understand a single word of Punjabi, and vice versa. Particularly if you goto parts of India or Pakistan that are distant from the state/province of Punjab in both of these countries. i.e. Karachi or Balochistan in Pakistan. Madras, Hyderbad or Bombay in the mid-south of India. Although they speak Urdu and Hindi respectively, they will not understand Punjabi, unless they were a Hindi or Urdu speaker near Punjab, i.e. New Delhi or Lahore. Most of us that can switch between Hindi, Urdu and Punjabi do so only because of cultural proximity between all three languages in that part of South Asia -- i.e. Punjab. Sort of like the Italian that can speak French and Spanish.

4. The ethnicities of the people. Pakistan used to be a part of India at one point, ethnically the people are the same. Culturally and religiously they are different. However, people that are not accustomed to "brown culture" do not notice these differences. Often, they will make the assumption we are "all the same." It's similar to the confusion you see with Asians. Chinese being confused for Vietnamese, Japanese, vice versa. How often have you heard someone call *any* asian person -- "Chinese?"

"Yeah I gave it to that Chinese guy" when in fact the guy is Korean. Same deal.

This happens with Indian people ALL THE TIME. Many people don't realize, although we are from the same country, we can be very very different ethnically, culturally, linguistically, religiously, physically, etc.

5. The influence of Bollywood has converted many native Urdu speakers into Hindi speakers. Many 'young/hip' Urdu speakers will have alot of Hindi in their language, but that is Hindi they are speaking -- not Urdu.

Edited by xtremelingo on 15 November 2007 at 7:58pm

1 person has voted this message useful



leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6362 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 32 of 53
16 November 2007 at 7:25am | IP Logged 
Bojan wrote:
The famous polyglots
All of them? What are their names?


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 53 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 2 35 6 7  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3438 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.