Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Wikipedia and language choice

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
55 messages over 7 pages: 1 2 35 6 7  Next >>
Snesgamer
Groupie
Afghanistan
Joined 6622 days ago

81 posts - 90 votes 
Studies: English*, German, Spanish, Norwegian, Scottish Gaelic

 
 Message 25 of 55
26 November 2006 at 4:13am | IP Logged 
Wow, according to that list, everybody would be learning Polish over Spanish which comes in at number 10? That already makes this criteria seem pretty foolish.


1 person has voted this message useful



OCCASVS
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Poland
Joined 6654 days ago

134 posts - 140 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: Italian*, English, French, Polish

 
 Message 26 of 55
26 November 2006 at 4:50am | IP Logged 
Why is Wikipedia much more popular among Poles than among Spanish speaking people?

Edited by OCCASVS on 26 November 2006 at 4:50am

1 person has voted this message useful



Topsiderunner
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6929 days ago

215 posts - 218 votes 
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Italian, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 27 of 55
26 November 2006 at 7:48am | IP Logged 
Some of it has to do with internet access and speed of connection, Poland
might be a more wired and internet savvy country than places in South
America. In the specific case of Spanish, many of the original
contributers to the Spanish wikipedia started a fork (enciclopedia.us.es) in
2002 because they mistakenly believed that wikipedia was going to begin
placing advertisements on pages. This somewhat stunted the growth of it
until new editors arrived.

If someone really wanted to base their language learning descisions on
internet usage, they should instead look at total figures for the entire
world (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Languages_on_the_Internet). This
would place English in first, Chinese second, and Spanish or Japanese in
third.
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6779 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 28 of 55
26 November 2006 at 8:08am | IP Logged 
On the other hand, the Spanish are avid bloggers. Spanish-language blogs trail only Japanese, English, and Chinese.
1 person has voted this message useful



nhk9
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 6815 days ago

290 posts - 319 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 29 of 55
27 November 2006 at 2:19pm | IP Logged 
It's not as simple as that. For example, had the gov't of PR China lifted most restrictions in its Great Firewall of China, you'd see a huge lift in the Chinese Wikipedia's page numbers.
1 person has voted this message useful



GoodSirJava
Diglot
Newbie
United States
down-with-big-brothe
Joined 6720 days ago

21 posts - 25 votes
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Japanese, Czech

 
 Message 30 of 55
30 November 2006 at 8:35pm | IP Logged 
I'd like to point out that the number of articles on a given Wikipedia is also an indirect indicator of the average length and quality of articles on that Wikipedia.


Where do I find all these Japanese language blogs, btw?
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6779 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 31 of 55
01 December 2006 at 2:50am | IP Logged 
Technorati, Google Japan, or Yahoo Japan. :)

According to a thing I saw at Technorati a few months ago, 35% of all blog posts they index are in Japanese.
1 person has voted this message useful



Andy_Liu
Triglot
Senior Member
Hong Kong
leibby.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6797 days ago

255 posts - 257 votes 
Speaks: Mandarin, Cantonese*, EnglishC2
Studies: French

 
 Message 32 of 55
06 December 2006 at 1:06pm | IP Logged 
nhk9 wrote:
It's not as simple as that. For example, had the gov't of PR China lifted most restrictions in its Great Firewall of China, you'd see a huge lift in the Chinese Wikipedia's page numbers.


Not really. The third ban was lifted half a month before for a couple of days. Number of users did increase at a much higher rate, but since many of them are newbies, there was neither a huge increase in page numbers nor better quality of new articles. Many violated copyrights. Also, the problem of neutrality changed since more of the then newcomers had different political ideas... I'd rather "prefer" a looser ban to the recent ban, which even blocks https and prevents more mainland wikipedians from accessing wikipedias.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 55 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 2 35 6 7  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3447 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.