Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Wikipedia and language choice

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
55 messages over 7 pages: 1 2 3 4 57  Next >>
makaveli1989
Groupie
United Kingdom
Joined 6754 days ago

69 posts - 73 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 41 of 55
07 December 2006 at 3:36pm | IP Logged 
Wikipedia should not be used to decide weather to learn a language or not.
The reason is no simpler than just because Wiki is popular in the English speaking countries does not mean it has the same popularity in other countries.
1 person has voted this message useful



RogueRook
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
N/A
Joined 6843 days ago

174 posts - 177 votes 
6 sounds
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: Hungarian, Turkish

 
 Message 42 of 55
07 December 2006 at 3:43pm | IP Logged 
Wikipedia seems to be decaying as of late. Recently I came across two articles in close succesion that had been vandalized, containing witticisms about SpongeBob.

It seems the bigger the project becomes the more inevitable its final collapse will be. Who is going to maintain and patrol the 1,500,000 English articles alone, not to mention the rest?

So to sum it up, it is ludicrous to base ones language choice on such an experiment as Wikipedia no doubt is.

Edited by RogueRook on 07 December 2006 at 3:45pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Marc Frisch
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 6676 days ago

1001 posts - 1169 votes 
Speaks: German*, French, English, Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, Italian
Studies: Persian, Tamil

 
 Message 43 of 55
07 December 2006 at 4:14pm | IP Logged 
RogueRook wrote:
You don't even know what the word means, boy. We had that before, didn't we. Back then I had to explain what ethnicity means.


First of all, I feel offended by this patronizing tone of yours. And yes, you already explained your weird conception of ethnicity.


RogueRook wrote:
As far as Jews are concerned they indeed display an astounding degree of intellectuality. They are very erudite and civilized people. Thats why I value Jews very much.


Prejudices are prejudices whether they are positive or negative.





1 person has voted this message useful



RogueRook
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
N/A
Joined 6843 days ago

174 posts - 177 votes 
6 sounds
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: Hungarian, Turkish

 
 Message 44 of 55
07 December 2006 at 5:40pm | IP Logged 
Marc Frisch wrote:


First of all, I feel offended by this patronizing tone of yours. ...



Self-victimization is en vogue these days I see... C'mon Marc. What are you, man or mouse? How can you feel insulted by what a stranger writes about you on an internet forum. Heck, this ain't real life... This place has no bearing on your self-esteem and nothing I write or say should make you feel patronized. How do you cope with real life if a snide comment makes you whine?


RogueRook wrote:
As far as Jews are concerned they indeed display an astounding degree of intellectuality. They are very erudite and civilized people. Thats why I value Jews very much.


Marc Frisch wrote:


Prejudices are prejudices whether they are positive or negative.



Granted. But prejudices have their merits too. Only those who aren't ready to adjust their prejudices after they know better are the real culprits.

One final note before trying to get this thread back OT: The word "racist" is the single most overused term in the English language. You grossly misapplied it when you said Alijsh made a racist claim. This guy is a Persian and he takes pride in his people. Can you blame him for that? He belongs to an Aryan people tracing its roots back thousands of years. And Persians are well aware of their great history. That's not racism

Then he paid the Jews a compliment. Since when is saying something nice about Jews racism?

This is what my snappy retort was about. You only talk about superficialities like tone and feeling patronized. That's not what I talk about.



Edited by RogueRook on 07 December 2006 at 5:43pm

1 person has voted this message useful



lady_skywalker
Triglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
aspiringpolyglotblog
Joined 6901 days ago

909 posts - 942 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*, Mandarin
Studies: Japanese, French, Dutch, Italian

 
 Message 45 of 55
07 December 2006 at 5:54pm | IP Logged 
Let's all keep away from racism/ethnicity/politics discussions as we all know where *those* threads end up. ;)
1 person has voted this message useful



RogueRook
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
N/A
Joined 6843 days ago

174 posts - 177 votes 
6 sounds
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: Hungarian, Turkish

 
 Message 46 of 55
07 December 2006 at 6:21pm | IP Logged 
Agreed lady_skywalker. But I won't just watch and let it pass uncommented when someone misuses these terms. My love of peace and harmony don't go beyond my love of frankness and being upfront when something irritates me.

Politics by the way was never part of the equation. Nobody is talking politics here.

It is just a given that there will be discussions and disagreements on an internet forum once in a while. Of course this musn't ecalate into profanity and foul language and on my part never will

Those who cherish pure and unadulterated friendliness and harmony should try Teletubbies for a change.







1 person has voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6593 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 47 of 55
08 December 2006 at 6:04am | IP Logged 
So Wikipedia isn't a good indicator of the merits of learning a language. What is, then? Assuming the starter of this thread wanted some sort of ranking for how "useful" a language is, how would the languages be graded? I'm guessing we'll have to go worldwide here, since Spanish is undoubtedly more useful for an American than, say, a Swede.

So here's a thought. How would the languages be rated if we grade them on a scale of communication potential? The idea here is simply to be able to communicate with the largest number of people possible. Like the Wikipedia scale, this will favour countries with many speakers (it is undoubtedly more useful to learn English than Swedish, for example), but in contrast, this scale would favour languages with less globalized and rich citizens. German would be rated pretty low, since most Germans speak English, so learning German would not increase the number of people you can communicate with very much, if you already know English. Spanish and Chinese would be very useful, however. I don't know how the English is in India, seeing as it's an old colony, so I don't know if Hindi would be considered a useful language here. French will probably get you pretty far in a lot of countries. I'm not well versed in the spread of languages, so I don't really have much to go on here. Arabic? Portugese? Russian? I haven't a clue what the list would look like.

Naturally, mutual intelligibility will have to be taken into account. If you can communicate with Slovaks by learning Russian, those who only speak Slovak would count as points for Russian (or maybe as half-points?).

Just a thought-experiment on my part, take it for what it is. It's not a method that I'm suggesting everyone should start using, nor is it a scale of which languages are "better" than others. So don't start defending the merits of learning the German language here (unless it's about how lots of people speak German but not English).
1 person has voted this message useful



Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6779 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 48 of 55
08 December 2006 at 6:29am | IP Logged 
Quote:
German would be rated pretty low, since most Germans speak English, so learning German would not increase the number of people you can communicate with very much, if you already know English.


This sort of statement its rather subjective, because you have to account for the level of proficiency you're considering. If you just want to communicate at a simple tourist level, sure, many Germans can probably manage that in English. If you want to have deep conversations on complicated subjects with those same people, you'll probably have to learn German.

Anyway, no matter what language you learn, you're not going to run out of people to communicate with. A list of "most useful languages" will be highly tailored to each individual language learner based on his own goals and criteria.

Edited by Captain Haddock on 08 December 2006 at 6:30am



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 55 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5000 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.