|
 |
Sentences vs. words | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : Questions About Your Target Languages |  | |
| furrykef Senior Member United States furrykef.com/ Joined 6475 days ago 681 posts - 862 votes  Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Japanese, Latin, Italian | Message 9 of 19 24 January 2009 at 7:19pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
I learn Spanish and Japanese using sentences, but with an emphasis on sentence production and not recognition. I think recognition is the wrong way to do it. The theory goes something like, "In the early stages of learning a language, you don't know how to produce correctly, which means you make mistakes and reinforce your mistakes, so you shouldn't produce very much. To produce correctly, you need input, so you should focus on input, therefore your flash cards should be recognition cards." This is all fine up until the "therefore..." at the end. The conclusion does not follow from the premise! Normally, yes, you probably shouldn't produce too much (except in an environment where you will be corrected often, like lang-8) to avoid making mistakes and endlessly reinforcing them, but that does not apply when making flash cards because the card will have the correct answer, guaranteeing reinforcement of the correct way to say it. If you get the answer wrong, you mark the card wrong and try again. So "recognition first" doesn't apply to flash cards.
Now, some people argue that testing production isn't good because you generally are translating from native language to target language, and this sort of "translation" is bad. Having experimented with this fairly extensively, I haven't found this to be a problem; I can think in Spanish without having to translate from English just fine. I only have to "translate" in my head when I'm working with words and sentence structures that I don't know very well in the first place. The other problem with testing production is there are often many different ways to say something in the target language. I've found this not to be a big deal. I typically just pick one way to say it and make a note of synonyms on the answer side of the card. On rare occasions I say an answer and I don't know if it's right or not because it doesn't match the answer side of the card. In that case I consult a dictionary/grammar book if I can, and if I still don't know, I shrug and mark my answer wrong. I don't terribly like the idea of marking a possibly correct answer wrong, but it happens rarely enough that I don't think it's a big deal; the convenience of being able to just deal with it and move on to the next question is enough compensation for me. - Kef 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| furrykef Senior Member United States furrykef.com/ Joined 6475 days ago 681 posts - 862 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Japanese, Latin, Italian | Message 10 of 19 24 January 2009 at 8:43pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
Oh, I'd forgotten to make one of the points I was going to make. One reason to do sentences over simple "book = libro" items is because it makes you more comfortable with reading complete sentences in your target language. "El florero está encima de la mesa" is better than just "florero = vase (for flowers)" even if "florero" is the only new thing you learn in that sentence, because when you do this for every item, it all adds up and you just feel a lot more comfortable with the language, I think. Don't use too many simple sentences like that, though... don't make them too long either, just make sure they're not too easy where every sentence is just one new word plugged into a simple structure. That can get pretty mind-numbing.
- Kef 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| Cainntear Pentaglot Senior Member Scotland linguafrankly.blogsp Joined 6014 days ago 4399 posts - 7687 votes Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh | Message 11 of 19 25 January 2009 at 6:46am | IP Logged | |||||
|
I'd just like to tell you about something that happened to me recently.
When I started learning Gaelic I got something that called itself a "course" but was in effect just a fancy flashcard program (TeachMe!). I abandoned it as ineffective and went to proper classes and taught myself out of a book in between, taking every possible chance to speak it. (Well, not quite "abandoned" -- I still used it from time to time to try to expand my vocabulary.) I recently found my vocabulary shrinking, so I went back to the program heavily. I remembered quite a lot of the words I'd learned through the program, but I don't remember ever using many of them. Then I got to new lessons and it asked me what "eye" was. I was completely stumped, but I know what "eye" is, because I use it all the time: in Gaelic, like in English, you can "have your eye on" someone; you can "cast your eye over" something -- I knew the word, but I couldn't recall it when prompted in that way. That convinced me more than ever that this sort of rote memorisation is completely different from meaningful learning -- the knowledge ends up in the wrong part of the brain. So I'm in the production camp, and it has to be proper independent production. It may not be the first time you've said it, but you don't want to be parroting it. You have to produce the sentence by going through the same process as if it was the first time -- so so-called "minimal coverage" sentences (just enough to cover the language point) are not truly minimal: they're insufficient.
Very well said. Too many people vilify this type of work for exactly that reason, and fail to recognise that people still translate internally even when they're not doing it externally, and always will do until it makes sense. Using English helps me understand things, so I get to stop translating sooner if the teacher gets me to translate in the first place. 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| Javi Senior Member Spain Joined 5984 days ago 419 posts - 548 votes Speaks: Spanish* | Message 12 of 19 26 January 2009 at 10:54am | IP Logged | |||||
Hi, I'm familiar with the AJATT method, but I don't really like the sentences approach. For that reason, all my cards are words, one single card for every word and every sense that have caught my eye. Depending on the kind of word, I use a different reminder, for example you can use a L1 word, a picture, an example sentence, a definition from a dictionary or whatever works for you. In my case 95% of my flashcards are either picture-word or definition+fill in the gap-word. So my cards aren't aimed at training neither production nor recognition, I use this memorisation tool to practise recall. My example sentences tend to be rather long, so I do a lot of recognition practise as well, but it's just a positive side effect, not the main point. I've been using a SRS program for two years, and after having tried all sort of things I can't help thinking that SRS is not the right tool to practise neither recognition nor production. In the first case because you miss the whole point of SRS, which is recalling and evaluating how well you recall. SRS is about a question and an answer, not just a question, so we could say you're using only half of the power. In the other you're forced to use your native language, which is the last thing you wanna do at an intermediate level, yes, precisely the level where an SRS tool makes sense. Just take my example: I threw away my last English course, which also happened to be my first English course, two years ago. I've been working with only English material ever since: movies, novels, TV series, blogs, I actually started learning English in the first place to do that, so how the hell am I gonna put Spanish in Mnemosyne? I won't spend a second translating from my L2 to my L1, that's mental, unless you're studying to become a professional translator. 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| Cainntear Pentaglot Senior Member Scotland linguafrankly.blogsp Joined 6014 days ago 4399 posts - 7687 votes Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh | Message 13 of 19 26 January 2009 at 11:17am | IP Logged | |||||
But there's translating, and then there's translating. If I say something in Spanish, you understand it by internalising it -- making it into "thought". If you then say it in English, are you translating from Spanish, or are you expressing the thought? I'd say that it's only really translation if you keep refering to the original sentences and consciously and analytically convert the sentence. If instead you read/hear the sentence in Spanish and then produce the sentence in English from your understanding and not from the form, that's not what most people are thinking of when they talk about "translation" in language learning. 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| Javi Senior Member Spain Joined 5984 days ago 419 posts - 548 votes Speaks: Spanish* | Message 14 of 19 26 January 2009 at 12:48pm | IP Logged | |||||
Maybe, but what I was saying is that even if you use translation in a safe way, it's not practical, especially once you give up language courses. One of the reasons is that you've got to spend time arranging the native version, or if you get it from somewhere, at least you have to check if it is suitable for your purposes. In my case, the first time I discovered that I'd spent ten minutes thinking of how to say some trivial sentence in my native language just to create a flashcard, even looking up words in the DRAE, I decided that from that point I would spend all my time on my target language. 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| Kleberson Diglot Senior Member Great Britain Joined 6421 days ago 166 posts - 168 votes Speaks: English*, Portuguese Studies: Italian, Russian, Arabic (Written), Mandarin | Message 15 of 19 26 January 2009 at 3:32pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
Personally, I use sentsences using my native English in the question field with the TL in the answer field. NOTHING compares to this style of learning for me [my opinion]. People can argue against this method, but I have been using this for portuguese and Italian and I CAN hold a very reasonable* convo with natives of these languages.
* An indepth convo about most topics. Thanks Edited by Kleberson on 26 January 2009 at 3:33pm 1 person has voted this message useful | ||||||
| slucido Bilingual Diglot Senior Member Spain https://goo.gl/126Yv Joined 6678 days ago 1296 posts - 1781 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan* Studies: English | Message 16 of 19 26 January 2009 at 4:33pm | IP Logged | |||||
|
I think there is no best method here.
The point of this SRS software is to implement a distributed practice review. It has strong scientific evidence. Very efficient. It doesn't matter if you mix up images, your native language, mnemonics or whatever. As long as you introduce your target language, it will work. I use what I feel like and I change my approach now and again. 1 person has voted this message useful |
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
