Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

REAL multi-languages fluency

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
102 messages over 13 pages: 1 2 3 4 57 ... 6 ... 12 13 Next >>


Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6702 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 41 of 102
14 September 2014 at 2:38pm | IP Logged 
Donaldshimoda wrote:
For example, I was astonished by Iversen's painting video,where he displayed amazing skills and an high level of education; when he switches to Italian, he speaks over a really demanding subject that probably even native speaker would struggle with. He surely has studied the language,I've no doubt his passive skills are amazing, but his pace and pronunciation are far frome being good. Nonetheless he CAN speak Italian, maybe he would even pass advanced exames but that is not the level I was asking about on this topic.


Well, it is the level I have stated that I can deliver. I haven't spoken Italian here in 2014 except a few sentences at the Berlin gathering, so choosing flawless Italian pronunciation with lightening speed as my main goal would be idiotic for me. Besides I know that my speed and accuracy benefits from a few days in a relevant country (like Italy in this case), and I have basically stopped making videos so in practice journeys and visits to language conferences are the only situations where my speaking skills are tested. Instead I work on getting a high level passively, a reasonably high level in writing and a functional, but solid level orally. And I have also other things to study, like the things I used as themes for those paintings: the Italian one was modeled over Orlando Furioso by Ludovico Ariosto. For me it is more important to know who/what that is than is to be able to pronounce it as well as a child in the streets of Ferrara could.

Edited by Iversen on 14 September 2014 at 3:58pm

7 persons have voted this message useful



beano
Diglot
Senior Member
United KingdomRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4621 days ago

1049 posts - 2152 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Russian, Serbian, Hungarian

 
 Message 42 of 102
14 September 2014 at 9:57pm | IP Logged 
JClangue wrote:


Sure you can become almost native in a language you've learned as an adult. But it will take
a lot of time...measured more in decades than months or years.


I think you can do it in less than 10 years, if the circumstances are right and the desire to fully engage with
the language is present.

My wife could barely speak any English aged 20 but by her late 20s, following years of solid immersion, I
would say she spoke just as good as a native.
3 persons have voted this message useful



Bao
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
tinyurl.com/pe4kqe5
Joined 5765 days ago

2256 posts - 4046 votes 
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Japanese, Mandarin

 
 Message 43 of 102
15 September 2014 at 5:21am | IP Logged 
JClangue wrote:

She was probably relatively close but definitely below that of an equivalently-educated
native. People tend to overestimate their level in things they aren't that advanced in.

I think you are misinterpreteting the Dunning-Kruger effect. Ten years are enough time to achieve significant proficiency in any skill, if they are used efficiently. After that time she would not have suffered from overestimating herself as more advanced than she is, like many people at their first low intermediate stage in a language do. If this was about her self-assessment (and for all I know it's beano's direct assessment of her skills) and she suffered from that bias, she would have started out overestimating her skills as "could barely speak any English" and a decade later, underestimating them as "just as good as a native", at which point she would probably have been better than most natives.

As for your idea that a native speaker has a set amount of years of a headstart I would ask you to think about how much time the average native speaker actually spends on trying to improve his or her language skills.

Edited by Bao on 15 September 2014 at 5:21am

2 persons have voted this message useful



Solfrid Cristin
Heptaglot
Winner TAC 2011 & 2012
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 5333 days ago

4143 posts - 8864 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, Spanish, Swedish, French, English, German, Italian
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 44 of 102
15 September 2014 at 7:47am | IP Logged 
Are we over complicating things with all our definitions and being overly coy?

I think I'll just answer to what I perceive to be the main question here: How many foreign languages do I
speak at a high level with a good accent. And my answer is three. English, French and Spanish.

I do not have a native, educated speaker level, nor could I hold a speech on astronomy in either of them, but I
can say pretty much what I want without thinking and with a fairly good accent. My knowledge in
technical/administrative vocabulary is best in English, my pronunciation is best in Spanish. I would range
them both as C2, French possibly at C1, since my writing skills are really bad, but my pronunciation should
meet the OPs demands.

But I'll let you judge for yourself, I include a link to a video I did with Richard Simcott 2 years ago. And yes,
my Italian accent is not great, but my background in Italian is only 5 weeks in Italy, a couple of semesters of
evening classes, 3 short term boyfriends in the late 80ies and more than 20 years of abandonment, so it
would have been a miracle if it were.

Oh, and everything else in the video is in the B-range, so not fluent.

Cristina's video

Edited by Solfrid Cristin on 15 September 2014 at 7:51am

2 persons have voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4706 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 45 of 102
15 September 2014 at 8:36am | IP Logged 
No, but JClangue reminds me of an old banned member called casamata who had a few other
aliases.

@Cristina; could you hold a speech on astronomy in Norwegian? If you can't, then it
doesn't matter that you can't in any other language.

Edited by tarvos on 15 September 2014 at 11:34am

1 person has voted this message useful





emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5531 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 46 of 102
15 September 2014 at 12:55pm | IP Logged 
JClangue wrote:
Unless she was so amazing that she could learn in 10 years what others have taken 29 years to do so. Savant-like.

Although I'm fond of pointing out just how amazingly good well-read native speakers really are, this doesn't mean that a non-native can't do very well after 3 to 5 years of the right kind of immersion.

In the US, native English speakers must generally take the SAT before applying to a university. The SAT Verbal is scored on a scale of 200 to 800. It tests primarily written, receptive knowledge. Here's what an admissions officer has to say about the SAT Verbal and English-as-a-Second Language students:

Quote:
Admission officials will be understanding when it comes to recognizing that English is not your first language, though it’s up to you to make sure that this is clear on your application. However, it’s important for you to realize that you will still be “competing” with many other applicants whose first language is not English and who score extremely well on the VSAT nonetheless. This is particularly true at the most selective colleges where admission officials repeatedly see candidates who only learned English within the past couple years but are still topping 700 with their verbal scores.

While I, personally, am very impressed by any student who manages to score in the 600s while not a native speaker of English, the fact is that, at elite colleges, most admission officials are not as easily wowed as I am.

The average native-speaker score on the SAT Verbal is 500 points, with a standard deviation of 110 points (or at least it was when they recalibrated the scores in the 90s). Doing some math, this suggests that a score of 700 puts the student in the 96th percentile, assuming the scores are normally distributed.

Or to put it another way, universities like Harvard and Yale get a fair number of non-native students who outperform 96% of university-bound natives after a "couple" of years. Now, this is only measuring passive skills, and it's entirely possible that these students studied English in another country before arriving in the US. (It's hard to imagine a Harvard student who didn't take English courses and read stuff on the Internet.) Even so, SAT Verbal scores in the 700s are quite respectable even for native speakers.

And I've seen plenty of first-hand evidence that speakers of Romance languages can go from B2 conversational skills in English to near-native within 3 to 5 years of full-time immersion, even without doing any studying at all.

The only skill I'm ignoring here is writing. Lots of non-native speakers write very good English (look around HTLAL). Some people who converse at near-native levels write poor English. The difference? The good writers usually read a lot of English.
2 persons have voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6702 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 47 of 102
15 September 2014 at 1:11pm | IP Logged 
Beano's wife could be amazing without being savantlike. 10 years of listening and learning could be better than 29 years spent on inefficient activities, like watching TV from your home country or looking out of the window. Normally you would expect that it was necessary to do some hardcore study in the beginning (including courses), but we don't know how that first phase was passed - and that information may actually belong to the private life of the Beanean household. But it might be possible to be an fluent speaker with a nearnative accent and still not know how to name the objects in your own kitchen. Just as you can know all the words and still not be able to speak fluently.

One thing to notice is that the language in question is English, and that "barely" most likely only refers to active skills. It may cover a fair amount of passive listening, maybe even some understanding, and then Beano's wife didn't start totally from scratch at the age of 20. What if she had moved to a small village in Hungary or Japan without knowing any Hungarian or Japanese, and Beano had been a fluent speaker of English? Would ten years to learn Hungarian or Japanese from scratch be enough?

Edited by Iversen on 15 September 2014 at 1:27pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Solfrid Cristin
Heptaglot
Winner TAC 2011 & 2012
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 5333 days ago

4143 posts - 8864 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, Spanish, Swedish, French, English, German, Italian
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 48 of 102
15 September 2014 at 1:16pm | IP Logged 
tarvos wrote:


@Cristina; could you hold a speech on astronomy in Norwegian? If you can't, then it
doesn't matter that you can't in any other language.


No, I could not, but I included the example precisely because we tend to be very
demanding when it comes to someone saying they know a language well. Sometimes it seems
that we demand way beyound what we would ask of a regular native speaker.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 102 messages over 13 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57 8 9 10 11 12 13  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.