Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

A continuation of the endless I/O talk

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
126 messages over 16 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 15 16
Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6010 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 121 of 126
04 December 2008 at 4:40am | IP Logged 
slucido wrote:
frenkeld wrote:
Wouldn't you then say that an approach that allows you to learn your target language before you are dead is objectively better than the one that doesn't?


You don't need to resort to dead.

You have an objectively worse method when it doesn't have input or output or it's so boring that you lose intensity.


True, he doesn't need to, but he can and he is perfectly correct to. There can be many types of objectively worse. You are focusing exclusively on one. He is saying that there are others.

If we took a pair of twins and gave them different methods for learning Kiswahili, and they both died at the same time, and twin A could speak Kiswahili perfectly and twin B couldn't Kiswahili, and both had put in equal time with the method...
... would you agree that twin A's method was "better"?
1 person has voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6674 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 122 of 126
04 December 2008 at 8:33am | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:
slucido wrote:
frenkeld wrote:
Wouldn't you then say that an approach that allows you to learn your target language before you are dead is objectively better than the one that doesn't?


You don't need to resort to dead.

You have an objectively worse method when it doesn't have input or output or it's so boring that you lose intensity.


True, he doesn't need to, but he can and he is perfectly correct to. There can be many types of objectively worse. You are focusing exclusively on one. He is saying that there are others.

If we took a pair of twins and gave them different methods for learning Kiswahili, and they both died at the same time, and twin A could speak Kiswahili perfectly and twin B couldn't Kiswahili, and both had put in equal time with the method...
... would you agree that twin A's method was "better"?



You are hypothetically speaking, but I am speaking about scientific facts. We are talking about this lack of scientific evidence from the very beginning...

Where are those studies? I would like to know.

If you have scientific evidence about any best method, let us know.





1 person has voted this message useful



ChrisWebb
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6262 days ago

181 posts - 190 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Korean

 
 Message 123 of 126
04 December 2008 at 11:10am | IP Logged 
I have a theory that in general their are 3 basic components to success in most endeavours;

1/ That the person is persistent in his/her endeavour ( for whatever reason ).

2/ That the person monitors his approach and is willing to adapt it over time both to eliminate what is not working for him and also to cfind and capitalise on what will work well.

3/ That a person is willing to take from the work already done by others what has been found by others to be useful. This includes at the least trying out methods that others have found to be helpful.

I think Slucido probably admits 1 and 2 but for some reason is rejecting 3. Unfortunately rejecting 3 is likely to lead to missed opportunities and a deal of unnecessary work. Reinventing the wheel ( or even trying and failing in the endeavour )is not likely to be productive.

Edited by ChrisWebb on 04 December 2008 at 11:11am

1 person has voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6674 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 125 of 126
04 December 2008 at 2:37pm | IP Logged 
ChrisWebb wrote:
I have a theory that in general their are 3 basic components to success in most endeavours;

1/ That the person is persistent in his/her endeavour ( for whatever reason ).

2/ That the person monitors his approach and is willing to adapt it over time both to eliminate what is not working for him and also to cfind and capitalise on what will work well.

3/ That a person is willing to take from the work already done by others what has been found by others to be useful. This includes at the least trying out methods that others have found to be helpful.

I think Slucido probably admits 1 and 2 but for some reason is rejecting 3. Unfortunately rejecting 3 is likely to lead to missed opportunities and a deal of unnecessary work. Reinventing the wheel ( or even trying and failing in the endeavour )is not likely to be productive.


I accept the three points, but my focus is in point one and two.

Why?

I think people waste a lot of time talking about how to learn languages and not studying them and I think the wheel has been invented.I think it boils down to:

1-Learn a word.

2-Learn a sentence.

3-Repeat point one and two.

If your target language has another alphabet, you can add: learn the alphabet or its signs.

From other point of view, learning languages boil down to: listen, read, speak and write...again and again.

Regarding experiences, tricks and the work already done by others, I reckon they are very useful, but more from a motivational point of view. For example: If you just talk about your experience in this forum, it is a good method. Sure you can get good ideas that you can try using a trial error process. Nobody denies that, but I think its usefulness rely on motivational factors.



1 person has voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6674 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 126 of 126
04 December 2008 at 2:53pm | IP Logged 

By the way, I think this new professor Arguelles video is very interesting.

Foreign language learning without a method

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=TMTHnGVxiP0

Enjoy it.




1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 126 messages over 16 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4531 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.