Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

How fluent to be a Polyglot?

 Language Learning Forum : Polyglots Post Reply
49 messages over 7 pages: 1 2 35 6 7  Next >>
Sinfonia
Senior Member
Wales
Joined 6747 days ago

255 posts - 261 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 25 of 49
21 July 2006 at 2:40pm | IP Logged 
rafaelrbp wrote:

But one problem that arises with this "polyglot metric": if you know Danish, and then study Norwegian and Swedish (actively), then you could claim you know 3 languages, but the effort needed to learn them is not that big. This would fall in the language/dialect problem.


Well exactly -- and that doesn't really chime with your first paragraph, or Iversen's justification.

If you know Danish, then Swedish and the two Norwegians are a piece of cake; if you know Russian -- Ukrainian and Belarusian likewise. There are hundreds of similar examples I could cite; in Africa you can even get 10 or 20 languages that are even closer than these examples -- yet they're considered by natives and linguists as separate languages. So effort is not really a tenable measure.
1 person has voted this message useful



rafaelrbp
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Brazil
Joined 7016 days ago

181 posts - 201 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, Spanish, English, French, Italian
Studies: German

 
 Message 26 of 49
21 July 2006 at 5:48pm | IP Logged 
Sinfonia wrote:
Well exactly -- and that doesn't really chime with your first paragraph, or Iversen's justification.


We couldn't define "language", "dialect", "fluency", "to know a language", and now we can't define "polyglot" either.

Is a polyglot someone who "learns" languages easily, or someone that"speaks" them or "studies" them? Or even someone who "reconstructs" old languages?

As I understand (and that's my opinion after thinking for a while), a polyglot is someone dedicated to learning languages, so he needs to put at least some effort on this goal. I know this definition is not precise, but let me get my point across:

If someone spends 10 years of his life studying all Romance languages, and another one spends these same years studying unrelated languages (say, Portuguese, Chinese, Persian, etc), both of them are polyglots.

And if you know Swedish, you wouldn't need 10 years to become fluent on Danish or Norwegian, but you could still study them and call yourself a "Northern Germanic specialist", maybe not a polyglot...

1 person has voted this message useful



Sinfonia
Senior Member
Wales
Joined 6747 days ago

255 posts - 261 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 27 of 49
21 July 2006 at 7:45pm | IP Logged 
rafaelrbp wrote:

We couldn't define "language", "dialect", "fluency", "to know a language", and now we can't define "polyglot" either.



That just about sums up the inherent 'fuzziness' of language!
1 person has voted this message useful



Journeyer
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
tristan85.blogspot.c
Joined 6871 days ago

946 posts - 1110 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, German
Studies: Sign Language

 
 Message 28 of 49
27 July 2006 at 3:16pm | IP Logged 
In my opinion, if there was someone who was raised speaking a multitude of languages fluently (say, for example both parents speak different languages, the child grows up in an environment where yet at least one other language is spoken....and heck let's say that he has a couple of rich relatives who have traveled the world and have mastered learned even more languages and teach their young nephew/niece/ or whatever), then I would consider that person a polyglot, even if he never formally studied those languages. That's a far-out example, of course, but my point is I think the title of polyglot can be acquired more or less naturally, even if the majority of us are going to have to do it slug it out a bit.

Edited by Journeyer on 27 July 2006 at 3:17pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Sinfonia
Senior Member
Wales
Joined 6747 days ago

255 posts - 261 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 29 of 49
27 July 2006 at 3:29pm | IP Logged 
Journeyer wrote:
In my opinion, if there was someone who was raised speaking a multitude of languages fluently (say, for example both parents speak different languages, the child grows up in an environment where yet at least one other language is spoken....and heck let's say that he has a couple of rich relatives who have traveled the world and have mastered learned even more languages and teach their young nephew/niece/ or whatever), then I would consider that person a polyglot, even if he never formally studied those languages. That's a far-out example, of course, but my point is I think the title of polyglot can be acquired more or less naturally, even if the majority of us are going to have to do it slug it out a bit.


That's very perceptive; you're quite right! How do I know? Because my children are polyglots, having been brought up in such circumstances, and even though none has ever studied a language formally.
1 person has voted this message useful





Iversen
Super Polyglot
Moderator
Denmark
berejst.dk
Joined 6706 days ago

9078 posts - 16473 votes 
Speaks: Danish*, French, English, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, Romanian, Catalan
Studies: Afrikaans, Greek, Norwegian, Russian, Serbian, Icelandic, Latin, Irish, Lowland Scots, Indonesian, Polish, Croatian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 30 of 49
27 July 2006 at 4:39pm | IP Logged 
I have earlier written that I was wary of accepting purely passive languages in the language lists, except in the case of languages or dialects that you understand as a result of hard work and studies. On the other hand I have absolutely no qualms about active languages and dialects that are learnt in the childhood, - if you can express yourself fluently and correctly and consistently in Western Flemish or Queen's English or Papiamento or even Esperanto then fine, you have got an item on you language list. It doesn't matter where that language came from. Maybe in fifty years you can get a new language with an injection at the hospital, it's still OK with me, as long as it's active. It may be unfair to all of us who started out with only one native language that some people get three for free in the cradle, but that's just the way it is.

And the point is, wherever you put the number of languages that a polyglot has to speak (and frankly, I don't really care), there will always be some that got their languages easily and others who had to fight all the way uphill.





Edited by Iversen on 27 July 2006 at 4:43pm

1 person has voted this message useful



patuco
Diglot
Moderator
Gibraltar
Joined 7018 days ago

3795 posts - 4268 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 31 of 49
27 July 2006 at 4:55pm | IP Logged 
Iversen wrote:
Maybe in fifty years you can get a new language with an injection at the hospital...

Now there's a medical breakthrough that I would gladly welcome!
1 person has voted this message useful



Journeyer
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
tristan85.blogspot.c
Joined 6871 days ago

946 posts - 1110 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, German
Studies: Sign Language

 
 Message 32 of 49
28 July 2006 at 12:00pm | IP Logged 
Thank you Sinfonia. :-)

And also, I would prefer the futuristic method in the form of two pills and a glass of water on full stomach...Not too fond of needles, actually. :-P



Edited by Journeyer on 28 July 2006 at 12:03pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 49 messages over 7 pages: << Prev 1 2 35 6 7  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5313 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.