Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

BCSM: use of the imperfect tense

 Language Learning Forum : Questions About Your Target Languages Post Reply
benzionisrael
Triglot
Groupie
Spain
Joined 4666 days ago

79 posts - 142 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese, SpanishB2

 
 Message 1 of 6
25 April 2012 at 11:37pm | IP Logged 
According to Wikipedia and some BCSM grammar sites, the language has oficially retained the imperfect tense, but it is mostly confined to the literary language and is not often used in everyday speach in Serbia or Croatia. In Bosnia and Herzegovina however, its use in conversation is more frequent according to the aforementioned sources.

Just how often is it used there and how is it used? If possible, some usage examples would be appreciated.


1 person has voted this message useful



Merv
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5274 days ago

414 posts - 749 votes 
Speaks: English*, Serbo-Croatian*
Studies: Spanish, French

 
 Message 2 of 6
25 April 2012 at 11:42pm | IP Logged 
benzionisrael wrote:
According to Wikipedia and some BCSM grammar sites, the language has oficially
retained the imperfect tense, but it is mostly confined to the literary language and is not often used in everyday
speach in Serbia or Croatia. In Bosnia and Herzegovina however, its use in conversation is more frequent
according to the aforementioned sources.

Just how often is it used there and how is it used? If possible, some usage examples would be appreciated.



The aorist is used more often. Both are rare in spoken language. Your best bet to see how it is used is to read
something like the Bible (Sveto Pismo), assuming you know the stories, so you'll see how these two tenses are
used. The perfect tense is practically replacing the other three past tenses, but you can encounter their use by
more educated people.

To tell you the truth, just google a particular verb + wiktionary, and you will get under the word entry its
conjugations. Among them you'll see the imperfect tense.
1 person has voted this message useful



Kartof
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5067 days ago

391 posts - 550 votes 
Speaks: English*, Bulgarian*, Spanish
Studies: Danish

 
 Message 3 of 6
26 April 2012 at 1:15am | IP Logged 
Merv wrote:

Both are rare in spoken language.


Wow, this honestly comes as a complete shock to me! I was under the impression that Serbo-Croatian made use of
either imperfect or aorist for its basic past tense but now that I looked it up, I see that you're right and that that's
not the case.
1 person has voted this message useful



benzionisrael
Triglot
Groupie
Spain
Joined 4666 days ago

79 posts - 142 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese, SpanishB2

 
 Message 4 of 6
26 April 2012 at 1:28am | IP Logged 
Merv wrote:
benzionisrael wrote:
According to Wikipedia and some BCSM grammar sites, the language has oficially
retained the imperfect tense, but it is mostly confined to the literary language and is not often used in everyday
speach in Serbia or Croatia. In Bosnia and Herzegovina however, its use in conversation is more frequent
according to the aforementioned sources.

Just how often is it used there and how is it used? If possible, some usage examples would be appreciated.



The aorist is used more often. Both are rare in spoken language. Your best bet to see how it is used is to read
something like the Bible (Sveto Pismo), assuming you know the stories, so you'll see how these two tenses are
used. The perfect tense is practically replacing the other three past tenses, but you can encounter their use by
more educated people.

To tell you the truth, just google a particular verb + wiktionary, and you will get under the word entry its
conjugations. Among them you'll see the imperfect tense.


Thank you. I´ll try out this Wiktionary site which you recommend. I will look up the imperfect´s conjugations if they are presented on that site.

What I would like to ask however is how is the imperfect tense used in educated Serbian or Bosnian? Is it used similarly or identically to the inperfect past tense verbs in Spanish like amaba, bebía o aprendía for example?


1 person has voted this message useful



Merv
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5274 days ago

414 posts - 749 votes 
Speaks: English*, Serbo-Croatian*
Studies: Spanish, French

 
 Message 5 of 6
26 April 2012 at 5:10am | IP Logged 
Kartof wrote:
Merv wrote:

Both are rare in spoken language.


Wow, this honestly comes as a complete shock to me! I was under the impression that Serbo-Croatian made use
of
either imperfect or aorist for its basic past tense but now that I looked it up, I see that you're right and that that's
not the case.


Haha. Yeah, I only recently learned the forms, they are so rarely used in spoken language. My sister who is also
fluent probably doesn't know them at all. My parents have NEVER used those two tenses in the home, EVER. Of
course they know them and probably studied them in school. Probably the only verb I knew the aorist for
growing up was the verb biti (to be), because its aorist forms are used coupled with the participle to make the
conditional.

For all intents and purposes, Serbian spoken language uses the present, the perfect, and the two future tenses.
However, more educated people who want to use more formal language, or more isolated people (e.g. rural
people, people in Bosnia or the southeastern part of Serbia which is close to Bulgaria) may choose to use the
pluperfect, aorist, and imperfect in spoken language.
1 person has voted this message useful



Merv
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5274 days ago

414 posts - 749 votes 
Speaks: English*, Serbo-Croatian*
Studies: Spanish, French

 
 Message 6 of 6
26 April 2012 at 5:22am | IP Logged 
benzionisrael wrote:
Merv wrote:
benzionisrael wrote:
According to Wikipedia and some BCSM
grammar sites, the language has oficially
retained the imperfect tense, but it is mostly confined to the literary language and is not often used in everyday
speach in Serbia or Croatia. In Bosnia and Herzegovina however, its use in conversation is more frequent
according to the aforementioned sources.

Just how often is it used there and how is it used? If possible, some usage examples would be appreciated.



The aorist is used more often. Both are rare in spoken language. Your best bet to see how it is used is to read
something like the Bible (Sveto Pismo), assuming you know the stories, so you'll see how these two tenses are
used. The perfect tense is practically replacing the other three past tenses, but you can encounter their use by
more educated people.

To tell you the truth, just google a particular verb + wiktionary, and you will get under the word entry its
conjugations. Among them you'll see the imperfect tense.


Thank you. I´ll try out this Wiktionary site which you recommend. I will look up the imperfect´s conjugations if
they are presented on that site.

What I would like to ask however is how is the imperfect tense used in educated Serbian or Bosnian? Is it used
similarly or identically to the inperfect past tense verbs in Spanish like amaba, bebía o aprendía for example?



Yes, the aorist and imperfect roughly correspond to the preterite and imperfect, respectively, of Spanish.

The key difference is that because Serbian has perfective and imperfective aspect for its verbs, you can only pair
aorist to perfective verbs and imperfect to imperfective verbs. If a verb can take either aspect, it can take either of
those two tenses, but this is a rare scenario.

E.g. kupiti (perfect to buy): ja kupih, ti kupi, on/ona/ono kupi, mi kupismo, vi kupiste, oni/one/ona kupiše

kupovati (imperfect to buy): ja kupovah, ti kupovaše, on/ona/ono kupovaše, mi kupovasmo, vi kupovaste,
oni/one/ona kupovahu

slomiti (perfect to break): ja slomih, ti slomi, on/ona/ono slomi, mi slomismo, vi slomiste, oni/one/ona lupiše

lomiti (imperfect to break): ja lomljah, ti lomljaše, on/ona/ono lomljaše, mi lomljasmo, vi lomljaste, oni/one/ona
lomljahu

There is no aorist for kupovati or lomiti and no imperfect for kupiti or slomiti.

However the verb videti (to see) can be both perfect or imperfect:

aorist (saw): ja videh, ti vide, on/ona/ono vide, mi videsmo, vi videste, oni/one/ona videše

imperfect (was seeing): ja viđah, ti viđaše, on/ona/ono viđaše, mi viđasmo, vi viđaste, oni/one/ona viđahu

The curious thing is how closely the two tenses resemble each other. The 2nd and 3rd person singular are
identical in both. The first person singular ends with an "h" sound in both cases. And the 1st and 2nd person
plural also have parallel "smo" and "ste" endings in both tenses.

Edited by Merv on 26 April 2012 at 5:24am



1 person has voted this message useful



If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 2.7031 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.