Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Increasing Language Automaticity via FSI?

  Tags: Fluency | FSI
 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
17 messages over 3 pages: 13  Next >>
tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4705 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 9 of 17
31 October 2013 at 5:30pm | IP Logged 
I think automaticity is something you want to train up from day 1. You can't be B1 or B2
without automaticity in your speech.
3 persons have voted this message useful



Bao
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
tinyurl.com/pe4kqe5
Joined 5764 days ago

2256 posts - 4046 votes 
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Japanese, Mandarin

 
 Message 10 of 17
31 October 2013 at 6:14pm | IP Logged 
tarvos wrote:
You can't be B1 or B2 without automaticity in your speech.

Please elaborate.
1 person has voted this message useful



luke
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 7203 days ago

3133 posts - 4351 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Esperanto, French

 
 Message 11 of 17
01 November 2013 at 5:38am | IP Logged 
I did many of the FSI Basic Spanish exercises dozens of times, perhaps 50 or more times over the years. In the beginning, it was my primary course. When I want to brush up my Spanish speaking skills, it's a very helpful review. I believe the course is about automaticity rather than simply a course for learning the grammar. Many features of the language are drilled over and over in many different contexts. Articles (la, las, el, los), noun/adjective gender agreement, verb tenses, as well as many features and subtleties of the language take root with this method.

Although I used it as my primary method, now with more experience, I think it may be better as a supplement for the more advanced student. It depends on when you want to start speaking. If you want to speak correctly and generally without hesitation, it's helpful from the start.

I agree with James29 that starting at the beginning may be useful. FSI Basic French has a lot more hours of drills, so it may not be necessary to repeat it as many times, as you'll get practice from the sheer volume of the course.

Doing even 10 minutes a day as an intermediate speaker really activates the spoken language when it's done day after day for a few months.

Edited by luke on 01 November 2013 at 5:41am

1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6595 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 12 of 17
01 November 2013 at 10:40am | IP Logged 
tarvos wrote:
I think automaticity is something you want to train up from day 1. You can't be B1 or B2 without automaticity in your speech.
B1 in speaking or B1 overall, no (let alone B2).
But you can be B1-B2 in other skills even if your speaking is behind.
1 person has voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4705 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 13 of 17
01 November 2013 at 11:36am | IP Logged 
Serpent wrote:
tarvos wrote:
I think automaticity is something you want to train up
from day 1. You can't be B1 or B2 without automaticity in your speech.
B1 in
speaking or B1 overall, no (let alone B2).
But you can be B1-B2 in other skills even if your speaking is behind.


(I agree with the point on the separation of skills, but I'm talking about speaking
skills here)

Yeah, you do need automaticity. At an intermediate level it means that basic structures
such as "I want to" "is/am/are" or simple case distinctions are drilled into your brain
and you can produce them automatically when asked for. You would still have trouble
putting together a longer phrase, but if someone asks you for example откуда вы? then
you should be able to respond with я из Голландии/я голландец immediately. That is
implied when you are a B1-B2 speaker.
3 persons have voted this message useful



montmorency
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4826 days ago

2371 posts - 3676 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Danish, Welsh

 
 Message 14 of 17
01 November 2013 at 4:03pm | IP Logged 
Yes knowing something and being able to produce it on demand are two quite different
things.


I used to be rather sceptical of the "drill" approach, but I'm rather in favour now,
although I have not used FSI.

I realised that my active skills (mainly speaking) in German were continually falling
way behind my passive ones, and no amount of increasing the latter was going to help
the former (at least directly), unless I did something about it. What I have done is
start "You Speak German" which in terms of content is far below my level, but when I
was truly at that level, I never got enough practice in actually speaking and have
always felt somewhat inhibited in that regard. FSI would probably have helped, as would
Michel Thomas, but anyway, YSG came my way, and I'm trying it, and quite liking it.

Spending (say) a month in Germany every year would probably have worked as well or
better, but that isn't a realistic possibility for me.





1 person has voted this message useful



DaraghM
Diglot
Senior Member
Ireland
Joined 6149 days ago

1947 posts - 2923 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: French, Russian, Hungarian

 
 Message 15 of 17
06 November 2013 at 9:42am | IP Logged 
I’ve been using FSI French recently to increase my spoken proficiency, but only specific drills. The slight problem with a number of the FSI drills is they use inversion in the question. E.g.

Veut-elle les essayer ?

Though this is correct, a number of sources such as Hachette (Grammaire Pratique du Français) imply this is only used now in the langage soutenu, and rarely in the spoken language. I remember learning this as standard French many years ago in school, but what is the current situation ?

1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5563 days ago

938 posts - 1840 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 16 of 17
06 November 2013 at 10:38am | IP Logged 
The current situation is that you get a very odd look, followed by the other speaker
switching to English.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 17 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 13  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4375 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.