|
 |
French: Fresh, fun & effortless media | ||
Share with:
| ||
 Language Learning Forum : Language Learning Log |  | |
| geoffw Triglot Senior Member United States Joined 4688 days ago 1134 posts - 1865 votes  Speaks: English*, German, Yiddish Studies: Modern Hebrew, French, Dutch, Italian, Russian | Message 497 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 7:19pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
"I demanded justice." Subjunctive?
EDIT: Slightly more pathological--"I demanded that result." Edited by geoffw on 21 March 2013 at 7:20pm 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| Josquin Heptaglot Senior Member Germany Joined 4844 days ago 2266 posts - 3992 votes Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian | Message 498 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 7:33pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
I hope this question wasn't serious, because otherwise I don't know how to answer it appropriately.
2 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||
| geoffw Triglot Senior Member United States Joined 4688 days ago 1134 posts - 1865 votes Speaks: English*, German, Yiddish Studies: Modern Hebrew, French, Dutch, Italian, Russian | Message 499 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 7:45pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
It wasn't really meant as a question, but I was making a serious attempt to suggest that my examples further show,
as emk argued, that special cases and exceptions can make machine processing of natural language fairly complicated. 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| Expugnator Hexaglot Senior Member Brazil Joined 5166 days ago 3335 posts - 4349 votes Speaks: Portuguese*, Norwegian, French, English, Italian, Papiamento Studies: Mandarin, Georgian, Russian | Message 500 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 7:52pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
I'm mostly concerned about concrete nouns, and these are the most tiresome to look up, because I often have to do the path French->English->Portuguese and sometimes even look use Google Images. Like yesterday, when a character's mother was giving the main character a recipe on a chicken dish. When I come across a word I find important, I find it demandatory to look it up, mostly verbs. I do hope it will get better with time. That book by Giono was much easier, and since most of my remaining books are ePub, maybe it's about time I get a pop-up French dictionary for my iPad. 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| Josquin Heptaglot Senior Member Germany Joined 4844 days ago 2266 posts - 3992 votes Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian | Message 501 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 8:04pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
@geoffw: Okay, now I get your point. That really is a problem.
1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
 emk Diglot Moderator United States Joined 5532 days ago 2615 posts - 8806 votes Speaks: English*, FrenchB2 Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian Personal Language Map | Message 502 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 9:04pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
Specifically, this is what The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language calls a "mandative subjunctive", one of three major uses of the subjunctive in English outside of fixed phrases (more on the other two in a second). Let me quote a bit. Here, "*" marks a phrase which is not valid English.
The other uses of the English subjunctive mentioned in CGEL are: * Certain fixed phrases: So be it, Long live… * A complement to if, unless, lest, etc.: Nothing in the English language has been ridiculued as much as the the ambiguous roots of words, unless it be the ambiguous use of sentences. * An "exhaustive conditional interrogative": Our thanks are due to all our staff, whether they be in the offices, the warehouses, or the branches, for their help during this difficult time. (They don't mention the famous Be he live or be he dead, I'll grind his bones to make my bread!, but nobody's perfect.) There's also a completely different construction which some teachers (particularly in the ESL world) like to call the "past subjunctive", and which CGEL refers to as the irrealis for clarity: If I were king… Anyway, CGEL has about 5 pages discussing the mandative subjunctive. The entire book is over 1,800 pages long, and it's really just a summary of what modern linguists know about English grammar. And the linguists who do this research are constantly running across weird little constructions that they can't explain. This is ultimately why you need massive amounts of exposure to learn all the fine points of grammar. The Grammaire progressive du français is a wonderful book, but even their Perfectionnement covers a minuscule fraction of what appears in an 1800-page doorstop like CGEL, which is only a portion of what every native speaker knows. (No native speaker was ever taught that [54]ii and [54]iii above are ungrammatical, and yet we all know it.) When Chomsky's followers attempt to reduce this endless complexity to statements like "Italian is a pro-drop language, but English isn't," as though there were some small set of tunable parameters in a Universal Grammar, I personally think they're hopelessly off track. There's a thousand perfectly ordinary English utterances like "Want to grab a bite to eat?" that violate these simple patterns. My personal hypothesis is that grammar is a half-baked attempt to extract a regular mathematical structure out the expressions actually observed in a language. When no pattern is apparent, we just repeat chunked phrases, or chunked phrases with a few variations slotted into likely-looking positions. Or to put it another way, grammar is first and foremost a bunch of snowclones, clichéd phrases with open slots. Or at least if you build your statistical natural language parser assuming this to be true, maybe you won't be ground down by the endless exceptions that led Sapir to declare, "All grammars leak." 1 person has voted this message useful | |||||||||
| emk Diglot Moderator United States Joined 5532 days ago 2615 posts - 8806 votes Speaks: English*, FrenchB2 Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian Personal Language Map | Message 503 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 9:16pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
(Just so you know, I've never seen the word "demandatory" before. A false friend or maybe a typo?) There's a tradeoff with looking up words. Sometimes a word will be totally opaque in context, but at other times the context will make its meaning clear. The idea of extensive reading is that you read fast enough that you encounter the latter sort of situation very often, and you learn thousands of new words. If you stop to look lots of words up in the dictionary, you'll read slowly, and you won't encounter the same total number of cases where the meaning of a word is made clear from context. And you also train yourself to "decode" carefully, and you don't get as much practice reading at a glance. I think that it's important to develop both skills. That's why I have good luck mixing the two kinds of reading. I find it enormously helpful to just sit down and blow through a paperback sometimes, ignoring any words I don't know. If I come back and read the book again a few months later, I often know all but one or two words per page. 2 persons have voted this message useful | |||||||||
| Expugnator Hexaglot Senior Member Brazil Joined 5166 days ago 3335 posts - 4349 votes Speaks: Portuguese*, Norwegian, French, English, Italian, Papiamento Studies: Mandarin, Georgian, Russian | Message 504 of 1317 21 March 2013 at 9:39pm | IP Logged | ||||||||
|
Sorry, I just meant mandatory. It doesn't exist in either English, Portuguese or French =D
On the other hand, I think what I do accounts for extensive listening. I won't look up a word I hear on TV because I won't know how it is spelt. I won't even be able to extract it from the blur of incomprehension. (That's not totally true, I can pick up some words in isolated contexts and I even happened to look them up, but this happened only two or three times). 1 person has voted this message useful |
|  | 
Printable version
|
| Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization. |
