89 messages over 12 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 10 ... 11 12 Next >>
Cavesa Triglot Senior Member Czech Republic Joined 5008 days ago 3277 posts - 6779 votes Speaks: Czech*, FrenchC2, EnglishC1 Studies: Spanish, German, Italian
| Message 73 of 89 21 August 2013 at 2:39pm | IP Logged |
Depends on how old children, how smart and how motivated. There are already some who understood they need to take things into their own hands. Some buy a ready made grammar book, others try to find some system in the mess their teacher created by themselves. There are some whose parents can and are willing to pay for better extra classes out of the school. And there is the majority that just gives up.
I agree that most troubles with the grammar come from it being taught wrong. Small pieces taken out of the context and grammar system (so common in English or German courses). The order of things being taught dependent on the "communicative" approach doesn't as well always go from the easier things to the more complicated (this is especially true for French). And especially teaching the nonsense approach that grammar is the boring evil separated from the real language.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Jeffers Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 4908 days ago 2151 posts - 3960 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Hindi, Ancient Greek, French, Sanskrit, German
| Message 74 of 89 23 August 2013 at 8:35pm | IP Logged |
I was browsing around some old threads, and rediscovered a thread with an article about lessons from 50 years of teaching FSI.
This quote from the article is quite relevant to this discussion:
Quote:
Ellis (1993, 1998) has speculated, we believe convincingly, that explicit instruction of grammatical forms can help learners develop awareness of the forms before they might otherwise do so and thereby become "ready" to learn them sooner.
At FSI, we find more and more that early focus on form makes and important difference--not focus on form at the expense of use or meaning, but focus that helps learners to develop awareness of significant aspects of the language that they will need later to capture precise distinctions in meaning. |
|
|
Taking this slightly further, let's look at an example of a student who is trying to read a simple book. If the student hasn't learned verb endings and case endings, then they will be hung up on those basic structures as they try to read the text. If they have learned these basic things, then they will instead be wondering about the more complicated aspects of grammar such as sentence structure much sooner. In other words, a little bit of work early on with basic and regular structures will enable the student to learn the deeper structures (which may not be able to be learnt as explicit rules) by extensive and intensive exposure.
For your edification, the link to the article is http://www.geolanguage.org/archives/sla/gurt_1999_07.pdf.
The link to the thread is http://how-to-learn-any-language.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?T ID=23446&PN=0&TPN=1.
Edited by Jeffers on 23 August 2013 at 8:40pm
5 persons have voted this message useful
| JC_Identity Triglot Groupie Sweden thelawofidentity.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 4120 days ago 53 posts - 108 votes Speaks: Swedish, Serbo-Croatian*, English
| Message 75 of 89 23 August 2013 at 10:52pm | IP Logged |
Qaanaaq wrote:
I love languages and studying them, but I've had a few interesting experiences lately.
--------
- I took a Hebrew class in college, and a few months ago met a native Hebrew speaker. I was talking to him about
binyanim (verb conjugation system), and he laughed me off, saying he didn't know any of the rules, and
"just used them without thinking".
- I was talking to my mother about Yiddish grammar (she's a native speaker). Yiddish has three genders, and she
confessed to me that she didn't know what a grammatical gender was. I've seen her speaking fluent Yiddish
rapid-fire to Hasidim, and yet she was completely unaware of the actual differences between der/di/dos.
- I took an intensive Spanish course in Guatemala. I found that studying the grammar drills was somewhat
beneficial, but actually speaking the language with natives gave me far more insight.
...Of all the languages I've studied, I've spent the least amount of time with grammar on Spanish, yet I speak
Spanish the best.
--------
The basic moral of the story is that native speakers never study grammar- they just learn the language. I never
once thought about deemphasizing grammar when studying a foreign language. I've broken my head trying to
cram in German grammar, and still to this day can barely read a newspaper auf Deutsch.
So my question is this: if I try and learn like a child, will this yield better results?
Just have fun with it, never (or rarely) study "rules", never look at charts. I realize my brain is adult now (23), so I
would NOT make the same neural connections a child would, but it'd be interesting to try this.
I'd really like to get German down pat, since it was the first foreign language I properly studied (I've later learned
others to much higher fluency). So I got a children's German picture book from the library, with 1000+ words and
very little grammar (explained extremely simply when it does appear). It comes with audio too.
My plan is to get through this book, then read some German comic books, then children's books with plots I
know well. I'd eventually watch movies/shows with which I'm familiar, dubbed, and without subtitles.
Has anyone learned a language to fluency or near-fluency without getting into the technicalities? Just watching
movies, reading children's literature, advancing to higher literature, etc? Would this work for a language with
extremely complicated grammar and few English cognates, e.g. Hungarian? |
|
|
I would like to say that I admire every person that has the courage to think for himself/herself, and I see it here in you. You have from your own observations started to question established "rules". I would like to give you the best advice an independent thinker can get: do not ever more accept anything you hear from others on faith, think for yourself, question everything. I think you are already showing that you are on to something big here. Just remember that whatever you do in any type of learning, you need comprehensive input. But of course properly you should not accept this on faith either, but try to prove it to yourself. Anyway I wish you good luck in your language endeavors!
1 person has voted this message useful
| lingoleng Senior Member Germany Joined 5297 days ago 605 posts - 1290 votes
| Message 76 of 89 23 August 2013 at 11:22pm | IP Logged |
JC_Identity wrote:
I think you are already showing that you are on to something big here. |
|
|
Maybe I am missing something, but he proposes "Learn like a child!" and wants to read some comic books. Let's hope his independent thinking will lead to even bigger astonishing revolutions!
Edited by lingoleng on 23 August 2013 at 11:26pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| montmorency Diglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 4827 days ago 2371 posts - 3676 votes Speaks: English*, German Studies: Danish, Welsh
| Message 77 of 89 23 August 2013 at 11:28pm | IP Logged |
emk wrote:
Stephen Krashen's big plea, for a great many years now, has been to supply kids with
more libraries (and fewer annual governmental exams). I think most foreign language
programs would benefit enormously from a library of, say, 1000 age-appropriate books
that appeal to kids. Certainly experiments like the one in Fiji suggest it would be a
good use of educational funds, if nothing else.
I have nothing against grammar study, in moderation. I just doubt that younger kids get
much out of it. And most of the methods that work for kids seem to work for me,
combined with a modest amount of grammar study and some feedback on my mistakes.
|
|
|
I like Krashen's big idea, although I should be honest and say that it tended to
confirm some of my preconceived notions, so perhaps I'm not being as intellectually
open-minded as I should be.
I can remember learning some English grammar in the upper primary school years (8 to 11
for us), and I think I got the gist of it, and I wonder if this was because by then I
was already an extensive reader (although I'd not been particularly quick to start
reading). I sometimes wish I had been an even more extensive reader then (reading from
a wider range), and wonder if it would have improved my intellectual development even
more? I feel I excelled in primary school, but burned out or underachieved in secondary
school, and maybe the foundation wasn't quite enough.
1 person has voted this message useful
| montmorency Diglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 4827 days ago 2371 posts - 3676 votes Speaks: English*, German Studies: Danish, Welsh
| Message 78 of 89 23 August 2013 at 11:41pm | IP Logged |
Qaanaaq wrote:
I love languages and studying them, but I've had a few interesting
experiences lately.
[...]
I'd really like to get German down pat, since it was the first foreign language I
properly studied (I've later learned
others to much higher fluency). So I got a children's German picture book from the
library, with 1000+ words and
very little grammar (explained extremely simply when it does appear). It comes with
audio too.
My plan is to get through this book, then read some German comic books, then children's
books with plots I
know well. I'd eventually watch movies/shows with which I'm familiar, dubbed, and
without subtitles.
Has anyone learned a language to fluency or near-fluency without getting into the
technicalities? Just watching
movies, reading children's literature, advancing to higher literature, etc? Would this
work for a language with
extremely complicated grammar and few English cognates, e.g. Hungarian? |
|
|
Your experiment sounds very interesting, and I hope you are able to document your
experiences with it in a log here, or somewhere we can link to.
I do not know if it will work, but I think you will be able to see quite quickly if you
are making progress, and hopefully that will encourage you.
As you know of course, children receive a massive amount of input and correction over
many years, and it's that you'd have to reproduce. The input is probably doable. I
don't know about the correction, unless you have friendly native speakers on hand.
One problem might be that you might get sick of reading children's books after a while,
and before you'd absorbed the necessary amount of input. If you can get over that
hurdle, you might be fine.
After they get to a certain point, I think even conventional learners stop focusing on
grammar to the extent that they studied it in the beginning. Maybe just the odd
reference to a grammar book or an online source. So after a while, your use of input
won't look much different to a lot of advanced learners here. You may lack the
grammatical knowledge to talk about the language the way that they can, but what does
that matter if you can read, write, speak and understand the language itself.
So good luck, and please report back now and again.
1 person has voted this message useful
| JC_Identity Triglot Groupie Sweden thelawofidentity.comRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 4120 days ago 53 posts - 108 votes Speaks: Swedish, Serbo-Croatian*, English
| Message 79 of 89 24 August 2013 at 9:57am | IP Logged |
lingoleng wrote:
JC_Identity wrote:
I think you are already showing that you are on to something big
here. |
|
|
Maybe I am missing something, but he proposes "Learn like a child!" and wants to read some comic books.
Let's hope his independent thinking will lead to even bigger astonishing revolutions! |
|
|
Why don't you let him think for himself. Reading comic books is great, you ensure comprehensive input by
having the pictures from which you can infer meaning. What I referred to in the quote there was his/her
realization that studying grammar does not help much to speak the language. Don't take from me, read what
Kato Lomb did. Here he/she has realized for him-/herself that the grammar-first approach is flawed, that is
big! Now lets not impose our own approaches here but let him/her continue the chain of thought. By thinking
independently and questioning for yourself, you will find the correct principle in the end, after all there is only
on reality, A is A. I say this because I see some imposing here, instead of honestly presenting one's ideas
objectively and always explaining the reason behind why one has chosen to follow a particular set of ideas.
1 person has voted this message useful
| lingoleng Senior Member Germany Joined 5297 days ago 605 posts - 1290 votes
| Message 80 of 89 24 August 2013 at 1:03pm | IP Logged |
JC_Identity wrote:
By thinking independently and questioning for yourself, you will find the correct principle in the end, after all there is only on reality, A is A. |
|
|
Oh my god, Aristotle, the law of identity, A is A, the real nature of identity! What an amazing thinker you are. A is A, that solves all our problems, thank you!
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.4219 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|