Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Can adult learners achieve native levels?

  Tags: Native Fluency
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
303 messages over 38 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12 ... 37 38 Next >>


emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5533 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 89 of 303
03 October 2012 at 9:35pm | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:
I believe it adds an element of contrast (accent - good grammar) and exotica that can be pleasing. Many people find a bit of a French accent quite pleasant in English. As a matter of fact, many light foreign accents can be even more pleasant than some indigenous dialects.


I once met an older man from the south of France. He spoke a wonderfully gravelly French (too many cigarettes?), and he was a joy to listen to in French. But when he eventually spoke to somebody in English, I was so startled I must have blinked—he had exactly the same accent in English that he had in French. The same vowels, the same intonation, everything. He smiled at me and said, "Well, I would try to get rid of the accent, except that women love it." So there are people who like thick French accents, too, at least in a social context.

Personally, I would love to eliminate almost all my accent in French, though I don't mind if a little leaks through now and then when I'm tired. If I can manage to be clear and pleasant-sounding, that's an excellent start.
2 persons have voted this message useful





jeff_lindqvist
Diglot
Moderator
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6910 days ago

4250 posts - 5711 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 90 of 303
04 October 2012 at 12:13am | IP Logged 
emk wrote:
But when he eventually spoke to somebody in English, I was so startled I must have blinked—he had exactly the same accent in English that he had in French. The same vowels, the same intonation, everything.


And that goes for nearly any speaker of any nationality I've ever witnessed, in person or on television. French people sound like coming straight out of "Allo' Allo!" (or a Pink Panther movie), Russians like Huliganov's Youtube parodies, and similar broken accents from Japanese, Germans, Spaniards, Chinese, Italians... Scandinavians aren't much better either. I think I've heard the best and the worst English sounding accents from Swedes.

Edited by jeff_lindqvist on 04 October 2012 at 12:13am

2 persons have voted this message useful



shk00design
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 4445 days ago

747 posts - 1123 votes 
Speaks: Cantonese*, English, Mandarin
Studies: French

 
 Message 91 of 303
04 October 2012 at 6:40am | IP Logged 
Depends on your network of friends and associations. I know a family who is mix ancestry. The father is
Austrian & the mother is Dutch. The 2 boys who were liiving in Canada never spoke their mother-tongue at
home. Now working in Europe they learned their French & German in school. And later Spanish & Italian
while living in Europe. This was after they left university. The parents have always been active in the local
church. Although they speak English with their European accents, you hardly pick out any grammatical
errors.

My father tried to pick up Spanish after his retirement. After several lessons quit. It was mostly his attitude
that gave him trouble. He has all the free time but can never see himself in a social environment outside the
classroom (being totally reliant on an instructor). Like someone who takes music lessons but not comfortable
performing.

1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 92 of 303
04 October 2012 at 1:42pm | IP Logged 
Serpent wrote:
That's just the approximate way to learn to produce something
similar. Native speakers keep the tongue behind the upper teeth.
Remember, we're talking about a native-like pronunciation here. Of course it's not that
hard to learn to produce this sound more or less comprehensibly, especially if you
remember to emphasize it where ambiguity might happen. (kinda like the people who get
the vowels slightly wrong everywhere apart from the words can't and sheet, because they
were taught to pay extra attention to these words).

For example, plenty of people from Western Europe use the articles correctly but can't
prnounce th, even if they speak pretty well otherwise. Of course many just aren't
trying, but many others are.

They have some other problems with grammar. But you forgot that phonetics is not
usually taught or is taught poorly. And if you managed to get the sound right, it is
right. But you can always encountre something new with articles.
1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 93 of 303
04 October 2012 at 1:59pm | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:

I'm not saying that a strong foreign accent is a good thing. I said "a bit of a foreign
accent..." @arekkusu used the term "residual accent" which I have used as well. Why do
I think that it is a winner when COMBINED with impeccable grammar and vocabulary?

I believe it adds an element of contrast (accent - good grammar) and exotica that can
be pleasing. Many people find a bit of a French accent quite pleasant in English. As a
matter of fact, many light foreign accents can be even more pleasant than some
indigenous dialects.

I hope its obvious that I'm not saying that a strong accent is good. Heavens no! I'm
not saying that a perfect native-like accent is bad either. What I'm ultimately saying
is that in the grand scheme of things impeccable grammar and vocabulary with a slight
accent is a better combination than mediocre grammar and vocabulary with a perfect
accent.

Now, is perfect pronunciation and impeccable grammar and vocabulary the ideal? I'm not
so sure. It depends on what wants to do. As I've said here and on many occasions, if
it's a personal goal or one wants to blend in linguistically speaking, then that's
fine. I just don' think it's worth the effort.

Let me add that I respect the people who make the great effort to sound native-like or
rather seemingly accent-free. I know the work that goes into that. But, the question
is: so what?

What does sounding like a native give if it means you sound just like everybody else?
It's great for YouTube videos and impressing some people, especially if there is a
contrast between looks and language. But suppose you are being interviewed on the radio
and you sound like a native speaker, what really counts is what you have to say not the
fact that you sound like any native speaker.

In summary, I can totally understand those who believe that sounding accent-free is an
important personal goal. But for me, I prefer to put my energies elsewhere and settle
for a little accent that makes me stand out.

Do you like native speakers who cannot pronounce certain sounds, for example pronounce
sh instead of s in English? Or ch instead of s in French (do the same thing)? Does it
give anything to them?
What would it give to me, if I pronounce English general questions and requests with
falling intonation at the end?
1 person has voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6583 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 94 of 303
04 October 2012 at 2:05pm | IP Logged 
It seems to me the major argument why one shouldn't work on one's accent is that it's mostly a waste of time. The vast majority of learners can work on their pronunciation until they're blue in the face and they won't get anywhere near native-like. Whereas the ones with a good accent don't need to spend time on it because it comes naturally. Sure, spend some hours working on understanding how the phonemes work and try to pronounce them correctly, but don't spend too much time on it, because that's time you could spend on grammar and vocab instead, where the ratio of effort to results is much better. Until someone comes up with some hard evidence I'm going to assume that accent if more or less fixed. If the first word you say in German doesn't sound like a German would say it, no word you say ever will, and no amount of "silent periods", shadowing* or virgin blood consumed under a full moon will get you there. Accept it and move on.

* Don't get me wrong, shadowing is a great method, but it's not gonna give you a perfect accent, as Arguelles will testify.
4 persons have voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5431 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 95 of 303
04 October 2012 at 2:12pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
s_allard wrote:

I'm not saying that a strong foreign accent is a good thing. I said "a bit of a foreign
accent..." @arekkusu used the term "residual accent" which I have used as well. Why do
I think that it is a winner when COMBINED with impeccable grammar and vocabulary?

I believe it adds an element of contrast (accent - good grammar) and exotica that can
be pleasing. Many people find a bit of a French accent quite pleasant in English. As a
matter of fact, many light foreign accents can be even more pleasant than some
indigenous dialects.

I hope its obvious that I'm not saying that a strong accent is good. Heavens no! I'm
not saying that a perfect native-like accent is bad either. What I'm ultimately saying
is that in the grand scheme of things impeccable grammar and vocabulary with a slight
accent is a better combination than mediocre grammar and vocabulary with a perfect
accent.

Now, is perfect pronunciation and impeccable grammar and vocabulary the ideal? I'm not
so sure. It depends on what wants to do. As I've said here and on many occasions, if
it's a personal goal or one wants to blend in linguistically speaking, then that's
fine. I just don' think it's worth the effort.

Let me add that I respect the people who make the great effort to sound native-like or
rather seemingly accent-free. I know the work that goes into that. But, the question
is: so what?

What does sounding like a native give if it means you sound just like everybody else?
It's great for YouTube videos and impressing some people, especially if there is a
contrast between looks and language. But suppose you are being interviewed on the radio
and you sound like a native speaker, what really counts is what you have to say not the
fact that you sound like any native speaker.

In summary, I can totally understand those who believe that sounding accent-free is an
important personal goal. But for me, I prefer to put my energies elsewhere and settle
for a little accent that makes me stand out.

Do you like native speakers who cannot pronounce certain sounds, for example pronounce
sh instead of s in English? Or ch instead of s in French (do the same thing)? Does it
give anything to them?
What would it give to me, if I pronounce English general questions and requests with
falling intonation at the end?

One of the problems of people who are obsessed with native-like pronunciation is that they tend to neglect other skills such as reading properly. If I may quote myself, here is what I wrote, as can be seen above, "What I'm ultimately saying
is that in the grand scheme of things impeccable grammar and vocabulary with a slight
accent is a better combination than mediocre grammar and vocabulary with a perfect
accent."

3 persons have voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 96 of 303
04 October 2012 at 2:24pm | IP Logged 
Ari wrote:
It seems to me the major argument why one shouldn't work on one's accent
is that it's mostly a waste of time. The vast majority of learners can work on their
pronunciation until they're blue in the face and they won't get anywhere near native-
like. Whereas the ones with a good accent don't need to spend time on it because it
comes naturally. Sure, spend some hours working on understanding how the phonemes work
and try to pronounce them correctly, but don't spend too much time on it, because
that's time you could spend on grammar and vocab instead, where the ratio of effort to
results is much better. Until someone comes up with some hard evidence I'm going to
assume that accent if more or less fixed. If the first word you say in German doesn't
sound like a German would say it, no word you say ever will, and no amount of "silent
periods", shadowing* or virgin blood consumed under a full moon will get you there.
Accept it and move on.

* Don't get me wrong, shadowing is a great method, but it's not gonna give you a
perfect accent, as Arguelles will testify.

No. Working on pronunciation gives better and quicker results. It took me several
minutes to learn how to pronounce "the" and I'm still not sure how to use it. I learned
languages at school and university and I know that good pronunciation is not required.
And what's better: to say "he like" instead of "he likes" or to say "shit" instead of
"sheet"?

Edited by Марк on 04 October 2012 at 2:39pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 303 messages over 38 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.