303 messages over 38 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 25 ... 37 38 Next >>
LaughingChimp Senior Member Czech Republic Joined 4700 days ago 346 posts - 594 votes Speaks: Czech*
| Message 193 of 303 18 October 2012 at 1:10am | IP Logged |
That's exactly why learning pronunciation by phonemes is a bad idea.
anamsc2 wrote:
I live in a region with a very high concentration of immigrants from all over the world, and I don't think I've ever met one that could pass for a native English speaker, much less who had native fluency. (That's not to say they don't exist of course; just that they're probably a tiny minority.) I wonder why the US and Canada would be so different in this respect. |
|
|
Could it be that you just don't notice those who pass for native speakers?
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6598 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 194 of 303 18 October 2012 at 2:07am | IP Logged |
anamsc2 wrote:
tommus wrote:
Canada is a land of immigrants, many who come here after the age of 20. And many, if not most, become indistinguishable in speaking from native English speakers by the time they are 50 or so. Some do not, but those stand out. The others are not so noticeable because they speak native-like English. Several of my friends came to Canada in their 20s and now have perfect English with no accent at all. |
|
|
Wow, really? I would say this is not the case in the US. I live in a region with a very high concentration of immigrants from all over the world, and I don't think I've ever met one that could pass for a native English speaker, much less who had native fluency. (That's not to say they don't exist of course; just that they're probably a tiny minority.) I wonder why the US and Canada would be so different in this respect. |
|
|
I think in both cases extralinguistic factors are important. It's not unusual to see an immigrant who's pretty fluent - it's desirable. Even if you try to evaluate nothing but the speech, the basic question still remains: was he/she born here? With the big (and WIDELY STUDIED!) languages like English, a minimal slip will already cause a native speaker to doubt. Even some native speakers might be taken for non-natives sometimes. (happens in other languages too but probably more in English?)
Maybe in Canada the presence of French gives you a bit of a leeway? You may wonder whether someone is bilingual and slightly better at French, for example. Also the necessity to learn at least some French means a non-native in Canada will have a slightly better knowledge of the "fancy words" in English. They might even use them a bit too casually - but if they learn to do it just right, this will produce a favourable impression as well.
Just speaking from my experience, though... Russian has a very complicated morphology, so it's hard enough to speak 100% correctly AND it's studied widely enough that almost any small mistake will make me think you're a very good learner:/ Sorry:( This summer in Finland, there was a Russian-speaking waiter at a restaurant and the rest of my family was relieved/happy/excited about that. I however spoke to him in Finnish because I was perfectly sure he was a non-native. Well, turns out he IS a native but left at a very young age. Oops :(
And there was another case when we had a Russian guide, who's also been living in Finland for long. The sad thing is that his Finnish didn't sound native-like at all (though before I knew I was willing to believe he spoke a weird dialect because the truth was just too sad ;_; ). I was actually pretty excited to ask him how he's learned Russian and get some useful advice!!! :(
1 person has voted this message useful
| petteri Triglot Senior Member Finland Joined 4933 days ago 117 posts - 208 votes Speaks: Finnish*, English, Swedish Studies: German, Spanish
| Message 195 of 303 18 October 2012 at 2:12am | IP Logged |
I reckon the ability to detect minor differences in accents heavily depends on the observer.
2 persons have voted this message useful
| tommus Senior Member CanadaRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 5867 days ago 979 posts - 1688 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Dutch, French, Esperanto, German, Spanish
| Message 196 of 303 18 October 2012 at 2:39am | IP Logged |
anamsc2 wrote:
I wonder why the US and Canada would be so different in this respect. |
|
|
I don't think they are all that different. I lived for four years in the US. I think the ones who do become natively-fluent are simply not noticeable for obvious reasons. I think they are found more often in situations where assimilation is important, as opposed to areas such as big cities where there are large, original language cultural groups and neighbourhoods. Most of my experience is with former Dutch speakers. Dutch immigrants have amazing integration and assimilation skills, and a very strong desire to do so, as well as a great head-start in English. I once had a long chat in the Netherlands with a young Dutch man (probably mid 20s). He had spent three years in Colorado. I assumed immediately that he was an American with what I took to be an American accent. We talked mostly about American topics and places. After an hour, he mentioned something about being Dutch. I couldn't believe it. He had only been out of The Netherlands for those three years.
The Dutch have immigrated to Canada since World War II in large numbers. Yet you never hear of a Dutch neighbourhood. They largely assimilate, and very quickly. And speak excellent English very quickly.
Even Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands speaks excellent British-sounding English. I haven't heard her speak much English, but based on what I have heard, I think most Canadians and Americans could mistakenly assume she was native-British. I'd be interested in further comments about her command of British English.
1 person has voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6598 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 197 of 303 18 October 2012 at 2:46am | IP Logged |
petteri wrote:
I reckon the ability to detect minor differences in accents heavily depends on the observer. |
|
|
Very true. There are mistakes that natives make and there are mistakes that non-natives make. Not all people are even aware of the difference, and not all of those that are aware can classify them correctly.
And an experience in language learning can be both an asset and a drawback. My relatives were far more ready to accept the two people I mentioned as native speakers. Apart from my 15 year-old cousin, they've heard more non-native Russian (before the USSR collapsed) and they also have a far more vague idea of what it takes to reach fluency in any language.
Edited by Serpent on 18 October 2012 at 2:51am
1 person has voted this message useful
| anamsc2 Tetraglot Groupie United States Joined 4560 days ago 85 posts - 186 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish, Catalan, German Studies: French
| Message 198 of 303 18 October 2012 at 3:27am | IP Logged |
LaughingChimp wrote:
anamsc2 wrote:
I live in a region with a very high concentration of immigrants from all over the world, and I don't think I've ever met one that could pass for a native English speaker, much less who had native fluency. (That's not to say they don't exist of course; just that they're probably a tiny minority.) I wonder why the US and Canada would be so different in this respect. |
|
|
Could it be that you just don't notice those who pass for native speakers?
|
|
|
Yes, of course, that's possible. However, why is it that nobody I've ever known well enough to ask where they're from (which is not a rare thing to ask here, as people come from all over the state and the country, as well as the world) happened to fall into that category? I mean, sure, the people I interact with very trivially (cashiers at a store, for example) could very well be foreign and have native-sounding English. However, none of the people I have spoken more that 100 words to (coworkers, friends, neighbors, teammates, even strangers I randomly talk to on the bus or at a bar) has ever had me thinking they were native when they weren't.
I'm not including those who moved to the US as children, of course. I also want to make it clear that I'm not saying these people don't exist. And I'm not saying that foreigners have terrible English; on the contrary, it's usually great. It's just that it's not native. I'm also guilty of the fake surprised "Oh no way! I thought you were from the US!" every once in a while...
2 persons have voted this message useful
| pesahson Diglot Senior Member Poland Joined 5729 days ago 448 posts - 840 votes Speaks: Polish*, English Studies: French, Portuguese, Norwegian
| Message 199 of 303 18 October 2012 at 8:40am | IP Logged |
anamsc2 wrote:
I'm also guilty of the fake surprised "Oh no way! I thought you were from the US!" every once in a while... |
|
|
Why would you do that? Saying that someone's English is very good surely is enough, it would be for me.
2 persons have voted this message useful
| tarvos Super Polyglot Winner TAC 2012 Senior Member China likeapolyglot.wordpr Joined 4708 days ago 5310 posts - 9399 votes Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish
| Message 200 of 303 18 October 2012 at 10:19am | IP Logged |
tommus wrote:
anamsc2 wrote:
I wonder why the US and Canada would be so different
in this respect. |
|
|
I don't think they are all that different. I lived for four years in the US. I think
the ones who do become natively-fluent are simply not noticeable for obvious reasons. I
think they are found more often in situations where assimilation is important, as
opposed to areas such as big cities where there are large, original language cultural
groups and neighbourhoods. Most of my experience is with former Dutch speakers. Dutch
immigrants have amazing integration and assimilation skills, and a very strong desire
to do so, as well as a great head-start in English. I once had a long chat in the
Netherlands with a young Dutch man (probably mid 20s). He had spent three years in
Colorado. I assumed immediately that he was an American with what I took to be an
American accent. We talked mostly about American topics and places. After an hour, he
mentioned something about being Dutch. I couldn't believe it. He had only been out of
The Netherlands for those three years.
The Dutch have immigrated to Canada since World War II in large numbers. Yet you never
hear of a Dutch neighbourhood. They largely assimilate, and very quickly. And speak
excellent English very quickly.
Even Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands speaks excellent British-sounding English. I
haven't heard her speak much English, but based on what I have heard, I think most
Canadians and Americans could mistakenly assume she was native-British. I'd be
interested in further comments about her command of British English.
|
|
|
But they keep their birthday calendars in the toilet, right?
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 1.2344 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|