17 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3
Elexi Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 5564 days ago 938 posts - 1840 votes Speaks: English* Studies: French, German, Latin
| Message 17 of 17 11 October 2012 at 12:06pm | IP Logged |
'I think I must have learned some from MT, or more likely organized what I already knew
into a more coherent form.'
- I think you are describing one of the strong points of the grammar translation method
(which is what MT, in essence, is ) and which is why it should not be abandoned despite
going out of academic fashion in the language teaching world.
The 1960s studies of language teaching in Pennsylvania comparing audio-
lingual/immersion approaches with grammar translation approaches found that grammar
translation produced better results, at least in terms of test scores - I think this
was partly due to the better grammatical organisation that the grammar translation
method teaches compared with the more inference based audio-lingual method (and, also,
probably partly due to more experienced teachers as the audio-lingual method was
relatively new at the time).
As Rout says, putting them all together, is better still.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 17 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.0938 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|