Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

What’s the most efficient language?

  Tags: Synonyms | Translation
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
44 messages over 6 pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Surtalnar
Tetraglot
Groupie
Germany
Joined 4401 days ago

52 posts - 67 votes 
Speaks: German*, Latin, English, Spanish
Studies: Arabic (Written), Arabic (classical)

 
 Message 41 of 44
04 March 2013 at 10:51pm | IP Logged 
Toki Pona is very bad in text length and shortness, I changed the Topic title to make clearer what I mean. ;)
1 person has voted this message useful



leroc
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4316 days ago

114 posts - 167 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 42 of 44
05 March 2013 at 8:40am | IP Logged 
Vulcan is the most efficient and logical language.
1 person has voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4712 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 43 of 44
05 March 2013 at 11:56pm | IP Logged 
Medulin wrote:
Toki Pona is not really the shortest. Because of its Newspeakesque
structure,
anything but the basic statements have to rely on cumbersome descriptive approach (beat
around the bush: I like raspberry jam: I like cooked sweet mass made from red berries
that grow on hills).


You can do away with the hills clause without trouble (other berries also grow on
hills)
and the whole point of Toki Pona is to meditate and put everything into simpler
constructions.

It's great because it forces you to bring down things to the bare essence, that is the
whole idea. If I wanted a long and philosophical sentence, that is what German is for.

Alternatively, Lojban?

Edited by tarvos on 05 March 2013 at 11:57pm

1 person has voted this message useful



shk00design
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 4449 days ago

747 posts - 1123 votes 
Speaks: Cantonese*, English, Mandarin
Studies: French

 
 Message 44 of 44
11 March 2013 at 5:56pm | IP Logged 
When it comes to # characters you enter, European languages are not efficient.

Don't know about other Asian languages but Chinese seemed to be very character-efficient. First there are
no breaks between words in a sentence. For example: "I am an American" would be "我是美国人". The
characters may look very difficult to write but counting the # characters (including spaces in between) in
the English version without the punctuation mark at the end: 16 and the Chinese version: 5. When you get
into an online discussion blog, you can insert entire paragraphs in Chinese even when # characters
allowed for text input is limited.

There are nouns that can be written in condensed form such as "World Trade Center" written as 世界贸易中
心 often shortened as 世贸中心 (4 characters). In English this is often shortened to the acronym WTC (3
characters, 1 shorter than the Chinese version). Another noun: 奥林匹克运动会 shortened to 奥运会 . In
English if we take "Olympic Games" and shortened it to "O Games" the text still takes up 7 characters and
the meaning wouldn't be clear as the Chinese version with just 3 characters.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 44 messages over 6 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2030 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.