Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Best Sources to Learn Norwegian

 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
30 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3
tractor
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 5454 days ago

1349 posts - 2292 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, Spanish, Catalan
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 25 of 30
19 July 2012 at 3:48pm | IP Logged 
Mjøl, mjølk and graut are still official spelling in Bokmål alongisde the far more common and traditional forms mel,
melk and grøt.
1 person has voted this message useful



daegga
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Austria
lang-8.com/553301
Joined 4522 days ago

1076 posts - 1792 votes 
Speaks: German*, EnglishC2, Swedish, Norwegian
Studies: Danish, French, Finnish, Icelandic

 
 Message 26 of 30
19 July 2012 at 5:04pm | IP Logged 
Quote:

In East Oslo, sometimes people use the feminine even for words which cannot be feminine at all in Bokmaal, according to Bokmaalsordboka, the official dictionary:

For example, they say DIALEKTA (in Bokmaal: DIALEKTEN, the dialect)
or Låta (in Bokmaal: Låten, the song, the tune).


isn't that the definite plural?
eg. guttene = gutta in some eastnorwegian dialects


and I had to laugh when I read the quote from TYS "there are not many feminine nouns".
I recently did some corpus linguistics on the Norwegian "ordbank" (used for the search of inflected forms in the online Bokmålsordboka). Here are some results:
There are around 25,000 words (well, it's a bit lower, maybe 23,200, I don't remember the exact count) in Bokmålsordboka that can officially be used as femininum in modern Bokmål. There are quite many composite nouns listed however (a lot with -tid or -sak), so the actual number is a bit lower (maybe around 20.000, about half of which end in -het, -(n)ing, -inne, -esse, etc.). Still not that low a number (there are about 115,000 nouns as lexical entries in Bokmålsordboka, so that means about 20% of all nouns can be feminine)
There was a list of about 1100 words that could only be female after the reform in 1938, the list was shrunk to 600-700 in a later reform (1981) and there are no words today that must be used with female gender. I take these words are still used more commonly with female gender (like jenta). So the statement should rather read "there are not many nouns commonly used with female gender" or something like that.

Edited by daegga on 19 July 2012 at 6:19pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



hrhenry
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
languagehopper.blogs
Joined 5131 days ago

1871 posts - 3642 votes 
Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese
Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe

 
 Message 27 of 30
19 July 2012 at 5:23pm | IP Logged 
This thread seems to have veered pretty far from the original question, and gotten
bogged down in the mintutiae of the language.

In an attempt to bring it back to the original question, I'll also recommend "På Vei",
and also recommend it be followed by "Stein på stein", then "Her på berget".

One good online resource worth checking out is Norword, located
here. I believe it was
originally created as "Sett i gang", or one of the authors may have gone one to create
that course - I can't remember. In any case, it's a good, free, online resource worth
checking out.

R.
==

Edited by hrhenry on 19 July 2012 at 5:54pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Medulin
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Croatia
Joined 4669 days ago

1199 posts - 2192 votes 
Speaks: Croatian*, English, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Norwegian, Hindi, Nepali

 
 Message 28 of 30
19 July 2012 at 6:31pm | IP Logged 
After 2005, in ''official'' Bokmaal, there are no longer words that must be obligatory feminine, before 2005 some nouns like jente had to be feminine: jenta (the girl) which was awkward to people from Bergen. After 2005 all forms are acceptable:
jenta-jenten, kua-kuen, dronninga-dronningen, rettskrivinga -rettskrivingen etc.
So, people in Bergen can use masculine forms for all these nouns, and people who live in regions where feminine forms are a norm (Stavanger, Trondheim, Troms) can use feminine forms, if they like to.

Riksmaal (the unofficial, the most conservative form of Bokmaal) has made some reforms too, now its official dictionary allows for these 3 nouns to be feminine: jenta (the girl), hytta (the hut) and øya (the island). All other nouns cannot be feminine.


The list of most frequent nouns used in female forms:

http://norwegianlanguage.info/grammar/ei-nouns.html

This (nowegianlanguage.info) is a good site for learners.



My blog on Norwegian has some information too:
http://norwegianquestions.blogspot.com/


Courses made outside Norway don't bother with the feminine gender (except for Pimsleur), courses made in Norway use the feminine forms, for example this one from the Trondheim University:

NORWEGIAN ON THE NET
http://www.ntnu.edu/now

West Oslo - East Oslo/Romerike difference is nowhere as drastic as the difference between the speech of the city of Bergen (with its 2 gender- only system) and the region just outside Bergen (known as Strill, where Nynorsk is the official written form, and where dialects with the obligatory feminine gender are spoken). You can imagine a ''conflict'' within the county of Hordaland betwen 2gender Bokmaal and Nynorsk. ;) Bergen serves as a capital of the whole region, so many times even newspapers articles and job advertisements are in Nynorsk. But people from Bergen tolerate people from Strill, as long as they use the french R. All other differences are forgiven. ;)

I guess we learners must be just as flexible as the native speakers.
In Brazilian Portuguese, in writing and in formal speech clitics go after the verb:
CUIDE-SE !(take care of yourself!), but in informal speech they go before the verb:
SE CUIDE! (take care of yourself!), some people may say SE CUIDE to a friend,
and CUIDE-SE as a warning, to an enemy...So, in Southeastern Norway, the same flexibity applies to female nouns: boka, natta may be informal to normal while
boken, natten are normal to formal.. Natta! is used as informal greating, for example.
Maybe boka, natta is more direct, while boken, natten is less direct. Maybe
you use boka, natta...addressing people you know (tú in Spanish, du in German) while you use boken, natten... with people you're not familiar with (usted in Spanish, Sie in German).

Edited by Medulin on 19 July 2012 at 7:15pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



tractor
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 5454 days ago

1349 posts - 2292 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, Spanish, Catalan
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 29 of 30
19 July 2012 at 6:52pm | IP Logged 
daegga wrote:
Quote:
For example, they say DIALEKTA (in Bokmaal: DIALEKTEN, the dialect) or Låta (in Bokmaal:
Låten, the song, the tune).

isn't that the definite plural?
eg. guttene = gutta in some eastnorwegian dialects

The ending -a can at least represent definite feminine singular (Bokmål, Nynorsk, most dialects), indefinte feminine
singular (Nynorsk and many dialects), definite neutral plural (Bokmål, Nynorsk, many dialects), definite masculine
plural (many dialects), undefinte masculine plural (many dialects), undefinite neutral plural (many dialects) and
undefinite feminine plural (many dialects)...

Anyway, this thread should be brought back on track...
1 person has voted this message useful



ericblair
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4712 days ago

480 posts - 700 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French

 
 Message 30 of 30
14 August 2012 at 6:36am | IP Logged 
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Grammar wise, get "Norwegian: An Essential Grammar" by Åse-Berit
and Rolf Strandskogen, very thorough but not a headache to read. Avoid "Norwegian Verbs
and Essentials of Grammar" by Louis Janus. He's not native and evidently never got any
natives to edit or supervise the creation of the grammar book. The amount of mistakes,
typos and things which are simply wrong really drags it down. It has a nice style and
explains some things very well, but all the mistakes detract from what could have been
a great book. Why a new corrected edition hasn't been released I can't comprehend.

The more recent Teach Yourself books from are pretty decent but their claims on the
packaging of achieving B2 level is definitely an exaggeration. Colloquial Norwegian is
a bit more thorough but features a little more formal and to some ears, slightly more
old fashioned language. I think the best textbook I've seen which has an English base
is "Learn Norwegian" by Sverre Klouman. It is very thorough but extremely well
explained and features a fair bit of colloquial language too, mainly from around the
Oslo area. It also later teaches in Norwegian when things get more advanced.

It can get a bit heavy going at times though but it is a great book if you want a very
rich resource in one book. It is out of print but can be found fairly cheaply on
abebooks.com/.co.uk. Don't bother tracking down the cassettes though, just send me a PM
and I can send you mp3s I made of them.


Hey! My copy of Klouman's "Learn Norwegian" just arrived in the mail. I have the 5th
edition, so hopefully that doesn't matter for the audio. If you (or anyone else reading
this) could help me out with the audio, I would really appreciate it! Thank you.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 30 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 1 2 3

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2891 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.