Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Haben and sein German verbs

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
15 messages over 2 pages: 1
montmorency
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4827 days ago

2371 posts - 3676 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Danish, Welsh

 
 Message 9 of 15
09 October 2012 at 4:49pm | IP Logged 
Interesting list Flarioca; thanks.

But would anyone like to comment on these two:

Quote:

Der Wein hat gegoren.
Der Wein ist gegoren.


I can think of a couple of possible explanations, but I'd prefer a more authoritative opinion, rather than speculate.


1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4843 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 10 of 15
09 October 2012 at 6:58pm | IP Logged 
montmorency wrote:
Interesting list Flarioca; thanks.

But would anyone like to comment on these two:

Quote:

Der Wein hat gegoren.
Der Wein ist gegoren.


I can think of a couple of possible explanations, but I'd prefer a more authoritative opinion, rather than speculate.



"Der Wein ist gegoren" is Zustandspassiv, while "Der Wein hat gegoren" is present perfect.

Edited by Josquin on 09 October 2012 at 6:59pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



montmorency
Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4827 days ago

2371 posts - 3676 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Danish, Welsh

 
 Message 11 of 15
10 October 2012 at 12:53am | IP Logged 
Josquin wrote:
montmorency wrote:
Interesting list Flarioca; thanks.

But would anyone like to comment on these two:

Quote:

Der Wein hat gegoren.
Der Wein ist gegoren.


I can think of a couple of possible explanations, but I'd prefer a more authoritative opinion, rather than speculate.





"Der Wein ist gegoren" is Zustandspassiv, while "Der Wein hat gegoren" is present perfect.



Thanks Josquin. Could we also conceive of a "normal" Vorgangspassiv here such as:


"Der Wein wird von der Wirkung von Zucker und Hefe gegoren" ?



(I know nothing about wine making, so apologies for technical inaccuracy...let's pretend it works that way for this example!)

1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4843 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 12 of 15
10 October 2012 at 9:16am | IP Logged 
montmorency wrote:
Could we also conceive of a "normal" Vorgangspassiv here such as:

"Der Wein wird von der Wirkung von Zucker und Hefe gegoren" ?

Yes, of course, but the correct sentence would be: "Der Wein wird durch die Wirkung von Zucker und Hefe gegoren (or maybe better: vergoren)."
2 persons have voted this message useful



outcast
Bilingual Heptaglot
Senior Member
China
Joined 4948 days ago

869 posts - 1364 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*, English*, German, Italian, French, Portuguese, Mandarin
Studies: Korean

 
 Message 13 of 15
15 October 2012 at 12:38am | IP Logged 
Flarioca wrote:
A list of phrases, some very similar, not supposed to be complete, from the following sources:

"Deutsche Grammatik" by Helbig and Buscha
"Hammer's German Grammar and Usage" by Durrell
A site

************************************************************ ********

Er hat in seiner Jugend viel gesegelt. Segelbote
Er ist nach Korsika gesegelt.

Sie hat den ganzen Tag geritten.ein Pferd
Sie ist übers Feld geritten.


Yes! It is exactly what I'm looking for, don't care if it is incomplete.

Question: Is it safe to assume that all the "haben" examples, like the ones above, are transitive even if the accusative is ommited? I placed the "ommited" objects in bold above.

If so, is it then possible to conclude that any "sein" verb that could possibly make sense with a direct object, would then be able to use "haben".

Finally, some verbs seem to just depend on the speaker. Some speakers use haben with "tanzen", others use sein. It seems from doing some reading that sein will be preffered if the preposition is accusative, and haben if the preposition is dative.

i.e. = tanzen mit jmdm
i.e. = tanzen durch (einen Raum)

Does this sound plausible?

Edited by outcast on 15 October 2012 at 5:38pm

1 person has voted this message useful



beano
Diglot
Senior Member
United KingdomRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4621 days ago

1049 posts - 2152 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Russian, Serbian, Hungarian

 
 Message 14 of 15
15 October 2012 at 12:54pm | IP Logged 
tarvos wrote:
Sein is used with verbs of movement, basically.


What about bleiben?
1 person has voted this message useful



outcast
Bilingual Heptaglot
Senior Member
China
Joined 4948 days ago

869 posts - 1364 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*, English*, German, Italian, French, Portuguese, Mandarin
Studies: Korean

 
 Message 15 of 15
15 October 2012 at 5:54pm | IP Logged 
Bleiben and sein are the only two major exceptions to the rule of using "sein". Though one could say there are a few other exceptions. "Begegnen" to me does not seem to indicate any change of condition or location, it just means to run into someome, but uses "sein". Treffen is not that different ("to meet") yet it uses "haben".

There may be one or two more that escape me right now, but all the other ones when you think about them show a change of status for the subject, or a change of locale. Verbs like "weichen" which have two past participles for two different meanings take "sein" in both definitions: the strong "gewichen" means "to yield" as in allowing some space between people or things, or "to step away/back"; the weak "geweicht" version means "to make bland/soft" or "soak".

In the first meaning you are making space or distance, which is a change of location. In the second, the subject is suffering a change in condition (as in "The leaves have softened in the water" = "Die Blätter sind im Wasser geweicht".


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 15 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 3.1091 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.