Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Your ideal curriculum

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
26 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4  Next >>
Heather McNamar
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4782 days ago

77 posts - 109 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Japanese, Latin

 
 Message 1 of 26
10 January 2013 at 3:26am | IP Logged 
This is something I've been curious about for some time now, and I thought I would pose this question to my fellow language learners. If this has been posted before, I apologize.

My question is, if you were in charge of a high school's foreign language program, and it were up to you, which languages would you include or exclude from the course offerings and why? I'm curious about this because I've been out of high school for close to fifteen years now, and the world has changed quite a bit in that time. We've seen the rise of China as a major player on the world scene, and the crisis in the Middle East is nowhere close to being resolved. Also, and I hate to suggest this, some more traditional languages might not be as popular as they once were.

When I was a student, my high school offered Spanish, French, Italian, German, and Latin. If it were up to me, I'd keep Spanish because it remains an important world language and it's beautiful and comes in handy. My additions to the courses would be Mandarin Chinese and Arabic, since the areas where those languages are spoken have risen on the world stage in recent years.

That's my two cents. Any comments, questions, or additions?
1 person has voted this message useful



ling
Diglot
Groupie
Taiwan
Joined 4586 days ago

61 posts - 94 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin
Studies: Indonesian, Thai

 
 Message 2 of 26
10 January 2013 at 4:39am | IP Logged 
When I was in high school (SF Bay Area), we had Spanish, French, German, Latin, and
Swahili. I would definitely add Chinese, and would like to add Arabic, Russian and/or
Japanese. I wouldn't want to eliminate any, but if forced to I'd have to look at which one
was least popular (regrettably, probably Swahili or Latin).
1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6597 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 3 of 26
10 January 2013 at 10:19am | IP Logged 
Why would you want to get rid of the 'easy' languages? An overwhelming majority picks the one they've heard will be easier for them, so there should be MORE "easy" options.

My ideal curriculum would give far less attention to the non-language subjects, so that most people could learn 3-5 languages at school.
1 person has voted this message useful



freakyaye
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 4838 days ago

107 posts - 152 votes 

 
 Message 4 of 26
10 January 2013 at 10:29am | IP Logged 
I would look at a mix of
community and world languages,
but the most important thing for
me is to choose a program that
is based on repetition first -
not with silly cartoons. Plus
teachers who care, my language
teachers in HS were so over it
they barely bothered.
1 person has voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4707 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 5 of 26
10 January 2013 at 12:07pm | IP Logged 
Serpent wrote:
Why would you want to get rid of the 'easy' languages? An overwhelming
majority picks the one they've heard will be easier for them, so there should be MORE
"easy" options.

My ideal curriculum would give far less attention to the non-language subjects, so that
most people could learn 3-5 languages at school.


I took five languages during my high school years, and I studied sciences for my
finals. In the Netherlands, both French and German are compulsory subjects in high
school for 3/2 years respectively. If you do the highest level of education, then you
have to pick either for your exam next to English. It's just a question of starting
early. People start French at 12 and German at 12 or 13 (depending on the level).

In Dutch schools, often French and German are the only options, but they're compulsory.
Some schools offer Spanish, and you have official school leaving exams in English (but
this is compulsory whatever you do, and it's never questioned) French, German, Frisian
(in Frisia), Spanish, Turkish, Arabic, Mandarin Chinese, Latin, Ancient Greek, and I
think also Italian and Portuguese depending on the school. But very few schools offer
the languages that are not French, German, Latin and Ancient Greek. Spanish is already
exotic. Frisian is only offered in Frisia.

I did the standard four languages + Latin (including Dutch) and I don't regret that. I
speak German based solely on my school education.

Edited by tarvos on 10 January 2013 at 12:12pm

4 persons have voted this message useful





emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5532 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 6 of 26
10 January 2013 at 4:13pm | IP Logged 
Personally, I think that US schools should decide whether they want their graduates to actually speak another language or not. Right now, way too many people make it to A1, or a really weak A2, and that's after 2 to 4 years of classes. And like anybody else at those levels, the students can't really use their skills, and they forget almost everything within a couple of years.

If US schools aimed for B1 Spanish, then students would actually be able to carry on conversations about concrete subjects. And some of those students would keep using their Spanish and eventually reach a decent level.

Of course, I'm all for other languages as well, including the dead ones. But if the US is going to teach people foreign languages, we should really try succeed on a semi-regular basis, and that means getting at least some students comfortably up into the intermediate CEFR levels where they can function independently. The current system assumes that virtually all students will fail to reach a minimally useful level, which results in a population that believes learning a language is impossible for anybody over the age of 6.

Maybe I'm just feeling too cynical today. :-)

Edited by emk on 10 January 2013 at 4:14pm

4 persons have voted this message useful



Darklight1216
Diglot
Senior Member
United StatesRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5100 days ago

411 posts - 639 votes 
Speaks: English*, French
Studies: German

 
 Message 7 of 26
10 January 2013 at 4:38pm | IP Logged 
This is probably the wrong sort of question for me to answer, but I'm going to take a shot anyway.

My high school "offered" a minimum of two years of Spanish as well as about two months of Swahili in the senior year before a missions trip to Kenya.

If I had my way I would ditch Spanish entirely because the curriculum is abysmal and it seemed as though almost no one actually learned how to communicate in the language (I say "almost" just to give the benefit of the doubt; to the absolute best of my knowledge it should really be "no one")

Swahili on the other hand was a crash course that was seldom used during the actual trip, however the class emphasized speaking and listening as opposed to memorising lists and taking written tests (like Spanish). So I'd give more empahsis to Swahili.

Truth be told, I'd rather have the ability to force elementary students into a classes which were instructed in a foreign language rather than do the usual high school "I studied this for X years, and I can't speak it."
2 persons have voted this message useful



Heather McNamar
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4782 days ago

77 posts - 109 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Japanese, Latin

 
 Message 8 of 26
10 January 2013 at 5:20pm | IP Logged 
Serpent wrote:
Why would you want to get rid of the 'easy' languages? An overwhelming majority
picks the one they've heard will be easier for them, so there should be MORE "easy" options.

My ideal curriculum would give far less attention to the non-language subjects, so that most people
could learn 3-5 languages at school.


That wasn't my intention. In fact, if it were up to me, I would keep them all and just add those extras. I
do love your suggestion about devoting less time to the non- language subjects. It makes me think of
the common objection regarding algebra: "When am I ever going to need this again?" On the other
hand, a language lasts a lifetime.


3 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 26 messages over 4 pages: 2 3 4  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4063 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.