39 messages over 5 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Next >>
Gala Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 4548 days ago 229 posts - 421 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Italian
| Message 25 of 39 02 July 2012 at 12:04am | IP Logged |
Random Review wrote : Do you know of any other course that 13 hours in has students
forming their own sentences with the imperfect subjunctive?!
************************************************************
***************************
**
Well, no....Unless you mean just something like "Yo quisiera un café," in which case
both Behind The Wheel and Learn in Your Car Spanish do teach the use of those kind of
constructions even quicker than that. But if Michel Thomas effectively teaches trickier
uses of the imp. subjunctive (meaning pretty much any other type of construction in it)
in that length of time, that's truly impressive.
I knew that the course wasn't appropriate for my level, and the sample I listened to
was probably from the beginning of the course as well. I was just curious about it,
mainly because people I know sometimes ask me for advice as to what resources they
should use when starting to learn Spanish. I believe that I can remember what it was
like in my own beginning phase well enough to form some sort of judgement as to whether
a not a program for that level seems worthwhile. It's true that the sample I heard was
likely too short for me to have a fully informed judgement, but it definitely was
sufficient to convince me that the course should not be used with the grind/over-
learning method (and from what you've written, I see that you agree on that.) I guess I
hijacked the thread a bit, and was somewhat too vociferous in what I wrote. It was in
the wee hours and I'd had a few drinks:)
Edited by Gala on 02 July 2012 at 12:06am
1 person has voted this message useful
| Random review Diglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 5781 days ago 781 posts - 1310 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Portuguese, Mandarin, Yiddish, German
| Message 26 of 39 02 July 2012 at 1:07am | IP Logged |
No, I mean proper sentences using the imperfect subjunctive such as in "if clauses".
This is a public thread, not a log, so I don't see how you could hijack it, I think
this is a really important topic so the more viewpoints the better. I hope it wasn't me
who made you feel that way (far from my intention). :-)
EDIT: If anything, on reading this thread over it's my posts that sound a bit
aggressive (totally unintentionally!), not yours.
One of the reasons I have such strong views on this is that I really love this product,
so can I take this opportunity to encourage you to try this in a language you don't
know well.
Gala wrote:
Random Review wrote : Do you know of any other course that 13 hours in has
students
forming their own sentences with the imperfect subjunctive?!
************************************************************
***************************
**
Well, no....Unless you mean just something like "Yo quisiera un café," in which case
both Behind The Wheel and Learn in Your Car Spanish do teach the use of those kind of
constructions even quicker than that. But if Michel Thomas effectively teaches trickier
uses of the imp. subjunctive (meaning pretty much any other type of construction in it)
in that length of time, that's truly impressive.
I knew that the course wasn't appropriate for my level, and the sample I listened to
was probably from the beginning of the course as well. I was just curious about it,
mainly because people I know sometimes ask me for advice as to what resources they
should use when starting to learn Spanish. I believe that I can remember what it was
like in my own beginning phase well enough to form some sort of judgement as to whether
a not a program for that level seems worthwhile. It's true that the sample I heard was
likely too short for me to have a fully informed judgement, but it definitely was
sufficient to convince me that the course should not be used with the grind/over-
learning method (and from what you've written, I see that you agree on that.) I guess I
hijacked the thread a bit, and was somewhat too vociferous in what I wrote. It was in
the wee hours and I'd had a few drinks:)
|
|
|
Edited by Random review on 02 July 2012 at 1:42am
2 persons have voted this message useful
| csidler Diglot Pro Member Australia chadsidler.com Joined 4821 days ago 51 posts - 59 votes Speaks: English*, German Studies: Italian, French Personal Language Map
| Message 27 of 39 03 July 2012 at 12:29am | IP Logged |
The real issue with repeating the course, is that you might start to learn/memorize the phrases, rather than
genuinely respond to the questions. So you arent really answering them (thinking it out, as Michel puts it) but
simply parroting/echoing a response that you have already heard from having already done it.
The reason Michel says to not try remembering or repeat it is because this induces tension that prevents
effective leArning, an example Michel refers to is when people "forget" a phone number or fact and say things
like "it is on the tip if my tongue..." but try as they might they can not remember, and that knowledge is
pushed further and further away. The minute you stop trying to recall (no pun intended) that persons number,
and turn your thoughts elsewhere, that is when u generally remember it without consciously trying, "it just
comes to you"
The real issue I think is some people do the first 5tracks of a cd, and before finishing the rest of the cd, come
back the next day to redo the first 5... This will not help. I know you have your own way of doing things, but
Michel is amazing, you must respect him, listen to him and do not disobey him!
Michel in his teaching always told his pupils not to put any expectations on themselves at the end of a day to
remember anything the next day, and those students were surprised when they got there the next day that
they remembered... Everything.
If you aren't finding this to be the case for yourself, then I suggest that perhaps when you Dio the courses
your mind is distracted - perhaps you are driving, browsing the Internet .. It is important to remove all
distractions and give it your complete attention, then it will work!
3 persons have voted this message useful
| tibbles Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 5189 days ago 245 posts - 422 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Korean
| Message 28 of 39 03 July 2012 at 6:56am | IP Logged |
Gala wrote:
Michel Thomas's
accent when speaking English was so thick |
|
|
I don't get all the hate on MT's accent. Am I the only one who actually enjoyed listening to his voice? My goal from following the course wasn't to learn mimic a native accent or memorize his material by listening to it 500 times. I just wanted an introduction to the grammar and important verbs and then move on to other materials. I find that I thrive on variety, not repetition. I feel that if people are letting MT's accent get in the way of learning, then they probably aren't all that eager to learn his concepts, regardless of purity of pronunciation.
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Wulfgar Senior Member United States Joined 4669 days ago 404 posts - 791 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 29 of 39 03 July 2012 at 8:09am | IP Logged |
Gala wrote:
Maybe the reason so many people think this course is great is because it strokes their egos, but from what I just heard I can't imagine that it gives them any kind of
preparation for conversation with native speakers. |
|
|
People think the course is great because it teaches a hell of a lot of grammar in just a few hours. That’s all. Everything else is pretty controversial. Personally, I love the course,
and I hate to see people treat it like some sort of magic trick. I always get a kick out of being pegged as a “program X” hater just because I don’t buy all the propaganda, and often
criticize it.
Random review wrote:
At any given point you are not supposed to be struggling with the vocabulary necessary for that sentence. Of course it will happen occasionally, which is
why I said it was nothing to worry about. |
|
|
I agree that to get maximum benefit from the program, you shouldn’t struggle with the vocabulary. In fact, I think I already said something like that. That’s why you should
memorize the vocabulary.
Random review wrote:
Now if memorizing vocabulary before doing the course (from transcripts or whatever) helps you do that then great (it wasn't necessary for me) |
|
|
I think most true beginners who don’t memorize the vocabulary beforehand are going to struggle with it. Occasionally with similar languages, and more often with dissimilar
languages. False beginners and above might be just fine, but it’s a good idea to scan the transcript beforehand to make sure.
For an example, here’s what I did the first time I went through MT Russian. I went to the transcript, about 4 lessons ahead of my current lesson, and wrote out the unknown
vocabulary for that day. I memorized it, reviewed it daily until the lesson came up, then stuck it into an SRS. The lessons went as smooth as silk.
Random review wrote:
I find it difficult to believe that you can have that amazing experience whilst simultaneously trying to memorize vocabulary as you go. |
|
|
I’m not sure what your straw man is doing here, so I’m going to assume that you think it’s bad to jot down an unknown word when you stop the CD. I disagree. I don’t do it this
way, but I see nothing wrong with jotting down the words, and learning them after the lesson. It wouldn’t be as smooth as learning them ahead of time. But it’s always a good
idea to repeat the whole course at a later date, maybe a month or two down the road, so you will be paving the way for a seamless run at that time. That’s one of the great things
about the course – it’s very short; repeating it isn’t much of a burden, and every time I’ve done it I’ve felt it’s worth my while.
Random review wrote:
At times I literally couldn't put them down and went 6 or 7 hours at a stretch without tiring. I have never experienced anything like it in any type of
learning. If you are not getting this feeling then you are missing an important part of the power of the method. |
|
|
If you want to do a single language learning activity for 6 or 7 hours straight, more power to you. But please don’t hold others to your standards. One CD a day is fine. Even
skipping a day on occasion is fine. Implying that there is something wrong with learners who don’t want to do your marathon sessions is odd.
Random review wrote:
(and Michel Thomas clearly failed to get you into that relaxed state) |
|
|
Did you really mean to say “you” here? I think you meant “my straw man”.
Random review wrote:
I disagree and not only from personal experience. Cainntear (until recently MT's biggest champion on this forum) for one stated that he stopped
repeating when he noticed he had started to learn one of the mistakes made by one of the students. You do, however, give an additional very good reason for not repeating!
|
|
|
My reason is the only correct reason. And someone would need to repeat the lessons frequently to develop this problem. The course definitely should be repeated for maximum
benefit. I recommend at least a month before repeating, just to be on the safe side. I bet Cainntear did it a lot more frequently than that, and I bet that problem would go right
away as long as he was getting enough exposure to actually learn the language. And who uses Michel Thomas to model pronunciation? Your straw man? It’s a very short program.
Advise your beginners not to try to speak Spanish with a Polish accent if you must, but please don’t tell people that there is something inherently wrong with repeating the course.
It’s impossible to Murphy-proof any course, but provided they don’t go repeat-happy in short intervals, repeating is good.
I did the Russian Foundation course(8CDs) twice, the advanced course(5CDs) 3 times, and the vocabulary course(4CDs) 4 times. Like I said, I got something out of each repeat,
and was glad I did it. I waited at least a month between each repeat. All the repeats of the Basic and Advanced courses were done without stopping the CD – that is what the
course is designed for. Repeating is not a sign of failure. The courses are so chocked full of information, it’s almost guaranteed you will pick up something that you missed
before. Even just doing the review is a great help. After all, it’s been proven that it’s good to mix some easy stuff in with the hard stuff.
I have done MT French, Mandarin, Japanese and Russian, all approximately the same way.
2 persons have voted this message useful
| Gala Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 4548 days ago 229 posts - 421 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Italian
| Message 30 of 39 03 July 2012 at 9:51am | IP Logged |
Wulfgar wrote:
My reason is the only correct reason.
|
|
|
Who could argue with that logic?
Edited by Gala on 03 July 2012 at 9:51am
4 persons have voted this message useful
| gravityguy Groupie United Kingdom Joined 4535 days ago 56 posts - 77 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish
| Message 31 of 39 03 July 2012 at 10:30am | IP Logged |
Randon review wrote:
At times I literally couldn't put them down and went 6 or 7 hours
at a stretch without tiring. I have never experienced anything like it in any type of
learning. If you are not getting this feeling then you are missing an important part of
the power of the method. |
|
|
Doing 6 or 7 hours for me is just not possible. I leave the house at 7:30 in the
morning and I'm not back until about 18:30, by the time I've had my dinner it's about
19:30. If I did 6 hours that would take me to 1:30 in the morning! Maybe if I was out
of work and on benefits I may be able to spend that much time doing it but fortunately
I'm not. Also as a personal point, if I do more than hour at a time (2 at the most)
then I begin to feel like it's not going in as effectively.
With regards to repeating, I had to go back 3 tracks on CD 2 as I just couldn't answer
his questions when I got to CD 3 and I feel that this helped a lot; so I don't see how
this can be a bad thing. I have also had a couple of days off here and there and I
still don't think that it has hampered my learning.
Hopefully I will have CD 5 finished by the end of today :)
2 persons have voted this message useful
| Random review Diglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 5781 days ago 781 posts - 1310 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Portuguese, Mandarin, Yiddish, German
| Message 32 of 39 03 July 2012 at 2:27pm | IP Logged |
Wulfgar wrote:
Random review wrote:
Now if memorizing vocabulary before doing the
course (from transcripts or whatever) helps you do that then great (it wasn't necessary
for me) |
|
|
I think most true beginners who don’t memorize the vocabulary beforehand are going to
struggle with it. Occasionally with similar languages, and more often with dissimilar
languages. False beginners and above might be just fine, but it’s a good idea to scan
the transcript beforehand to make sure. |
|
|
It shouldn't be necessary, I started Spanish and German with MT and also did the
French and Italian courses for fun. I have no talent for languages and don't have a
particularly great memory. If you just relax the course is designed so that you won't
have that trouble
Wulfgar wrote:
For an example, here’s what I did the first time I went through MT
Russian. I went to the transcript, about 4 lessons ahead of my current lesson, and
wrote out the unknown vocabulary for that day. I memorized it, reviewed it daily until
the lesson came up, then stuck it into an SRS. The lessons went as smooth as silk.
|
|
|
OK, now I get what is happenning here, MT Russian is not a real MT course, I struggled
to remember vocabulary with MT Greek. I even repeated the course! With the exception of
Dutch you need to adapt the new MT Method courses and your suggestions might be good
ones. I'm even currently trying to think of a way to edit out the voices of the
students so that I can go through the Greek course for a 3rd time. With the original 4
courses (Spanish, German, French and Italian) that were done by MT himself I stand by
what I said earlier.
Wulfgar wrote:
Random review wrote:
I find it difficult to believe that you can have
that amazing experience whilst simultaneously trying to memorize vocabulary as you go.
|
|
|
I’m not sure what your straw man is doing here, so I’m going to assume that you think
it’s bad to jot down an unknown word when you stop the CD. I disagree. I don’t do it
this way, but I see nothing wrong with jotting down the words, and learning them after
the lesson. |
|
|
I'm not trying to set up a straw man: you are trying to remember (regardless of how you
are doing it) and that creates tension, MT said so himself. Where's the straw man?
Wulfgar wrote:
it’s very short; repeating it isn’t much of a burden, and every time
I’ve done it I’ve felt it’s worth my while. |
|
|
Many good reasons have been given on this thread why repeating should be treated with
caution.
Wulfgar wrote:
Random review wrote:
At times I literally couldn't put them down and
went 6 or 7 hours at a stretch without tiring. I have never experienced anything like
it in any type of learning. If you are not getting this feeling then you are missing an
important part of the power of the method. |
|
|
If you want to do a single language learning activity for 6 or 7 hours straight, more
power to you. But please don’t hold others to your standards. One CD a day is fine.
Even skipping a day on occasion is fine. Implying that there is something wrong with
learners who don’t want to do your marathon sessions is odd. |
|
|
My standards?! I can't and don't do that with any other material (except L-R), but with
MT it's just easier that way and I believe it works better and wanted to help people.
If it's not easier for them then so be it. I never said that there was anything wrong
with people who don't do it that way; what I was trying to say was that if you are not
enjoying it enough that you don't want to put it down (regardless of whether you do or
not) you're not getting the full power of the method. I stand by this.[/QUOTE]
Wulfgar wrote:
Random review wrote:
(and Michel Thomas clearly failed to get you into
that relaxed state) |
|
|
Did you really mean to say “you” here? I think you meant “my straw man”. |
|
|
I mean you. I never set up a straw man: were you trying to remember or not?
Wulfgar wrote:
Random review wrote:
I disagree and not only from personal experience.
Cainntear (until recently MT's biggest champion on this forum) for one stated that he
stopped repeating when he noticed he had started to learn one of the mistakes made by
one of the students. You do, however, give an additional very good reason for not
repeating!
|
|
|
My reason is the only correct reason. And someone would need to repeat the lessons
frequently to develop this problem. The course definitely should be repeated for
maximum benefit. I recommend at least a month before repeating, just to be on the safe
side. I bet Cainntear did it a lot more frequently than that, and I bet that problem
would go right away as long as he was getting enough exposure to actually learn the
language. And who uses Michel Thomas to model pronunciation? Your straw man? It’s a
very short program. Advise your beginners not to try to speak Spanish with a Polish
accent if you must, but please don’t tell people that there is something inherently
wrong with repeating the course.
It’s impossible to Murphy-proof any course, but provided they don’t go repeat-happy in
short intervals, repeating is good. |
|
|
But some people DO repeat frequently. And some people DO complain about the accent. I'm
trying to help these people. I don't think your reason is the only correct reason, but
as you don't develop any arguments against the other reasons I don't know what else to
say.
Wulfgar wrote:
Repeating is not a sign of failure. The courses are so chocked full of
information, it’s almost guaranteed you will pick up something that you missed
before.. |
|
|
Who said it was? Notice, though, that what you say above implies you are trying to
learn the contents of the course and THAT is precisely what I claim is a bad idea.
tibbles wrote:
I don't get all the hate on MT's accent. Am I the only one who actually enjoyed
listening to his voice? My goal from following the course wasn't to learn mimic a
native accent or memorize his material by listening to it 500 times. I just wanted an
introduction to the grammar and important verbs and then move on to other materials. I
find that I thrive on variety, not repetition. |
|
|
I love MT's accent and agree 100% with what you write above, that is exactly how I
think the courses should be used.
tibbles wrote:
I feel that if people are letting MT's accent get in the way of
learning, then they probably aren't all that eager to learn his concepts, regardless of
purity of pronunciation. |
|
|
I don't agree and I think MT is such a great product that half of what I have written
above is with these people in mind, to try and encourage them not to miss out.
@ gravityguy: I also work. If you can't do it on your days off then you can do it when
you're on holiday, if that's not possible then obviously you have to do sessions that
are possible for you. I wasn't saying it only works if you do it that way, what I meant
was that if you are not enjoying yourself so much that you WANT to keep on going
(regardless of whether that is possible for you) then you are not getting the full
power of the method IMO.
EDIT: @gravity guy: if you feel it stops going in as effectively after an hour or so
then of course you should do what works for you. Continuing would only create tension
and interfere with your learning. Sorry, dude. I didn't mean to sound dogmatic about
long sessions.
gravityguy wrote:
With regards to repeating, I had to go back 3 tracks on CD 2 as I just couldn't answer
his questions when I got to CD 3 and I feel that this helped a lot; so I don't see how
this can be a bad thing. |
|
|
It's not. It's exactly what MT recommended. I was talking about repeating the whole
course.
Edited by Random review on 03 July 2012 at 3:04pm
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3750 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|