Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

How to learn English pronunciation?

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
35 messages over 5 pages: 1 24 5  Next >>
Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4845 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 17 of 35
14 August 2012 at 9:17pm | IP Logged 
Heriotza wrote:
Yes, English need desperately a Spelling Reform, but there is still ways (with many excepcion -that for sure-)to extract phonetic rules and develop a system

Oh no, a phonetic spelling of English would make the language absolutely unintelligible!
All the etymological roots would be unrecognizable!
It would be like abolishing Hanzi in Mandarin! Barbarity!
2 persons have voted this message useful





emk
Diglot
Moderator
United States
Joined 5533 days ago

2615 posts - 8806 votes 
Speaks: English*, FrenchB2
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 18 of 35
15 August 2012 at 12:33am | IP Logged 
Another technique which would probably help is any variety of Listening-Reading: Take a
book you like, find a matching audiobook, and read and listen to the same text in
parallel. You can also use an L1 translation if that helps.

The idea is to associate common words with their pronunciations via massive exposure. A
couple of passes through your favorite novels would certainly teach you how to pronounce
most of the common words. (And do be sure to listen to a lot of English, in general.)

These sorts of techniques helped convince me that French pronunciation was actually
logical and straightforward. Make of that what you will.

2 persons have voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 19 of 35
15 August 2012 at 1:16pm | IP Logged 
Josquin wrote:
Heriotza wrote:
Yes, English need desperately a Spelling Reform, but
there is still ways (with many excepcion -that for sure-)
to extract phonetic rules and develop a
system

Oh no, a phonetic spelling of English would make the language absolutely unintelligible!
All the etymological roots would be unrecognizable!
It would be like abolishing Hanzi in Mandarin! Barbarity!

Are you serious or joking?

1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4845 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 20 of 35
15 August 2012 at 1:24pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
Are you serious or joking?

I'm perfectly serious!
1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 21 of 35
15 August 2012 at 1:27pm | IP Logged 
Then, how did other languages which did a spelling reform survived?
1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4845 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 22 of 35
15 August 2012 at 1:57pm | IP Logged 
One could arguably state that the German language has been ruined by the several spelling reforms since 1996, but that's another cup of tea.

Simply imagine 'night' and 'knight' would be spelled 'nite'. They wouldn't be distinguishable anymore and all connections with German 'Nacht' and 'Knecht' would be lost. Or if 'enough' were spelled 'enuff', what would it still have to do with 'genug'? 'To cough' would maybe be spelled 'to coff'. Where's the connection with 'keuchen'? Okay, it would work with 'blood', which would become 'blud' and would be closer to German 'Blut'.

But these are only etymological trifles. The real problem would be to find a way to write phonetically, because English has to many phonemes. Should one use diacritics or silent letters (but then it wouldn't be phonetical again)? And how to write loanwords from French or Latin? Phonetically or etymologically?

Don't get me wrong. English orthography is a bloody mess, but I don't know if a phonetical spelling would be the best solution. Ha, good word! How would you spell 'solution'? 'Solooshen'??? See what I mean?
1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 23 of 35
15 August 2012 at 2:18pm | IP Logged 
If they can understand the difference between "knight" and "night" in speech, there won't
be any problem in writing.
English has the same amount of phonemes as other languages or even less. There are a lot
of ways. i would write both words "nait". One can abolish all those silly "oo" and write
simply "u" as all the people on the planet.
3 persons have voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4845 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 24 of 35
15 August 2012 at 2:33pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
i would write both words "nait". One can abolish all those silly "oo" and write
simply "u" as all the people on the planet.

And that's what I mean by "barbarity"...


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 35 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 24 5  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.7031 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.