97 messages over 13 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 7 ... 12 13 Next >>
leosmith Senior Member United States Joined 6548 days ago 2365 posts - 3804 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Tagalog
| Message 49 of 97 23 September 2011 at 7:20am | IP Logged |
Why not just create the courses and let MT publish them? They wouldn't be free, but at least they'd be available. On
the other hand, if you create a free program that violates some patent, what could they sue you for? There won't be
any profits, after all.
1 person has voted this message useful
| jazzboy.bebop Senior Member Norway norwegianthroughnove Joined 5416 days ago 439 posts - 800 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Norwegian
| Message 50 of 97 23 September 2011 at 4:13pm | IP Logged |
leosmith wrote:
Why not just create the courses and let MT publish them? They
wouldn't be free, but at least they'd be available. On
the other hand, if you create a free program that violates some patent, what could they
sue you for? There won't be
any profits, after all. |
|
|
Highly unlikely Hodder would publish anything by people not already affiliated with
them. From what I've seen, all the MT Method courses were made by people who had
already produced courses for Hodder in the past. There is also the problem of taking
the risk of publishing a course by an unknown person. They probably wouldn't want to go
to the expense of having an expert in the language evaluate the course either and
they'd likely be stringent on things like sound quality too.
They've already decided not to publish anything else, I doubt a fan-made course handed
to them on a plate will make them change their minds unfortunately.
Edit: My info appears to be incorrect, it seems they will actually publish later
courses after all.
Edited by jazzboy.bebop on 24 September 2011 at 1:59pm
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Chris Heptaglot Senior Member Japan Joined 7119 days ago 287 posts - 452 votes Speaks: English*, Russian, Indonesian, French, Malay, Japanese, Spanish Studies: Dutch, Korean, Mongolian
| Message 51 of 97 23 September 2011 at 5:28pm | IP Logged |
Spot on jazzboy.bebop!
1 person has voted this message useful
| Spanky Senior Member Canada Joined 5954 days ago 1021 posts - 1714 votes Studies: French
| Message 52 of 97 23 September 2011 at 7:01pm | IP Logged |
leosmith wrote:
Why not just create the courses and let MT publish them? They wouldn't be free, but at least they'd be available. On
the other hand, if you create a free program that violates some patent, what could they sue you for? There won't be
any profits, after all. |
|
|
I agree the likelihood of a lawsuit is extremely remote. Just for fun, though, the measure of damages in a patent violation claim need not be related to profit made by the violator, but as easily can be the loss of profits experienced by the patent holder.
If you Leosmith as an aerospace or aeronautical engineer (I still believe you are a spy notwithstanding your denial, as discussed in another thread) developed a super-swell idea for a product or process that you can sell and make a $gazillion in profits, but someone comes along, violates your patent and gives your prized patent-protected product or process away for free, your claim against her or him is for damages of $1 gazillion dollars, representing your loss regardless of the absence any gain on the part of the patent violator.
I have a vested interest in patent protection, as I have a patent application pending (I am trying to scoop another forum member's spinning wheel project, the one that reportedly only killed 6 of 10 mice).
2 persons have voted this message useful
| montmorency Diglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 4826 days ago 2371 posts - 3676 votes Speaks: English*, German Studies: Danish, Welsh
| Message 53 of 97 23 September 2011 at 7:35pm | IP Logged |
I've been looking through all this again, I would really like to see it succeed.
I think that it is clear that any use of the MT name itself is almost certainly out of
the question. Far too risky.
Patent infringement: Well, aside from the fact that the patent may not be
enforceable in the UK (although, while Neil may be in the UK, some of his potential
volunteers might be in the USA...), I believe in industry legal ways of getting round
patents are used all the time. Basically I think you would just have to add some
feature that you could claim is uniquely your own, i.e. not part of the original patent
(but I'm not a patent expert, so obviously it needs checking). Morally dubious perhaps,
but as this is non-profit-making, I don't think that is much of a problem.
So you need to call it something else, say a catchy title that tries to sum up what
it's all about. Someone suggested the HTLAL course, which could do as a working title
until someone comes up with something better.
Then you need to find one or more unique or original features to add, and actually,
this has a lot to do with the individual tutor. For example, one of the things that MT
was always saying on his recordings was "I take full responsibility for your learning",
which is pretty mind-blowing when you think about it. It was probably a psychological
trick, but I think very effective. Well, I don't think you'd want to risk saying that
on these courses, but if you could come up with some similar psychological aids to
confidence building, and any other new features that people can think of.
I think the two students idea should be retained, as should the use of the pause
button in exactly the way it was used by the original MT recorded courses. But with of
course the addition of any original ideas that people can come up with, which may well
be during the recording of the course itself, i.e. it shouldn't be cast in concrete
from the beginning, but should be allowed to grow and evolve. As someone else said, you
have to give the "creatives" - the course developers - freedome - the freedom to be
creative.
I have a preference for experimentation, testing and prototyping before doing something
for real, especially something as time-consuming as this.
This includes, but may not be limited to:
1. The process - the organisation of how the volunteers interwork (and Librivox seems
a good model, as someone mentioned)
2. The teaching method(s) - Is it working? - Do we need to try something new?
So, as again someone said, try one first and see how it goes.
Of course, it means the overall process will take longer, but it's probably worth
taking the time to get it right. Once the process(es) and the method(s) are proved,
then hopefully it should build up a momentum of its own.
Well, talking of patents, etc, someone who knows about these things needs to give some
thought as to the status of the copyright of the finished courses.
And, in the fullness of time, I would be happy to volunteer to be a guinea-pig student
on one of the Scandinavian courses. (I'll be the stupid one ... I have form :-) ).
Edited by montmorency on 23 September 2011 at 11:31pm
2 persons have voted this message useful
| Chris Heptaglot Senior Member Japan Joined 7119 days ago 287 posts - 452 votes Speaks: English*, Russian, Indonesian, French, Malay, Japanese, Spanish Studies: Dutch, Korean, Mongolian
| Message 54 of 97 24 September 2011 at 3:09am | IP Logged |
And you want all this to be done for free?
Good luck with that!
1 person has voted this message useful
| leosmith Senior Member United States Joined 6548 days ago 2365 posts - 3804 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Tagalog
| Message 55 of 97 24 September 2011 at 11:20am | IP Logged |
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
They've already decided not to publish anything else
|
|
|
please cite
Spanky wrote:
the measure of damages in a patent violation claim need not be related to profit made by the violator, but as easily can be the loss of
profits experienced by the patent holder.
|
|
|
That's true. So just for giggles, set it up under an LLC. The LLC has no money, and goes broke if sued, but no real harm is done. Is that possible?
Spanky wrote:
If you Leosmith as an aerospace or aeronautical engineer (I still believe you are a spy notwithstanding your denial, as discussed in another thread)
|
|
|
Look who's talking. We all know that Spanky is just a thinly veiled cover for the underworld king-pin Buckwheat. Alfalfa confessed all in the national
enquirer, or have you already forgotten?
Spanky wrote:
I have a vested interest in patent protection, as I have a patent application pending (I am trying to scoop another forum member's spinning wheel
project, the one that reportedly only killed 6 of 10 mice). |
|
|
If you get to 10, I'd like to buy the patent myself.
1 person has voted this message useful
| jazzboy.bebop Senior Member Norway norwegianthroughnove Joined 5416 days ago 439 posts - 800 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Norwegian
| Message 56 of 97 24 September 2011 at 1:57pm | IP Logged |
leosmith wrote:
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
They've already decided not to publish anything else
|
|
|
please cite
|
|
|
It was a comment made on the official MT Method facebook page less than a year ago that
they would not publish any more courses for any further languages after being asked
about the progress of the Hindi course, however, having looked through their post
history again, in August they now say that the Hindi course is delayed until summer of
next year.
And I saw that someone made the suggestion recently for a Hebrew course which the
people who run the facebook page say will be passed on so it looks like they will be
doing more languages in future after all.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.4531 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|