slucido Bilingual Diglot Senior Member Spain https://goo.gl/126Yv Joined 6667 days ago 1296 posts - 1781 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan* Studies: English
| Message 33 of 52 14 December 2010 at 8:04am | IP Logged |
Aineko wrote:
In other words: he would succeed if he had some kind of a reference :) (and was able to
choose what to watch). |
|
|
As I said before, you have a strong reference (the visuals) and he chooses to watch the channels he likes, whatever the reason.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
Aineko Triglot Senior Member New Zealand Joined 5440 days ago 238 posts - 442 votes Speaks: Serbian*, EnglishC2, Spanish Studies: Russian, Arabic (Written), Mandarin
| Message 34 of 52 14 December 2010 at 8:20pm | IP Logged |
slucido wrote:
As I said before, you have a strong reference (the visuals) and he chooses to watch the
channels he likes, whatever the reason.
|
|
|
well, if he finds Russian equivalent of BBC's Muzzy, he might stand a chance. Otherwise,
if he can only access material designed for native speakers, I can't see how is he going
to grasp advanced abstract concepts. Try learning Russian by watching TV serial based on Dostoevsky's The Idiot and you'll see.
Visual references need to be carefully structured and repeated many times (in a very
clear association with words) in order to get you to learn and advance. That is why
cartoons can work to a certain degree but can only get you so far in terms of complexity.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
Random review Diglot Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 5775 days ago 781 posts - 1310 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Portuguese, Mandarin, Yiddish, German
| Message 35 of 52 14 December 2010 at 8:59pm | IP Logged |
Aineko wrote:
[QUOTE=slucido]
Visual references need to be carefully structured and repeated many times (in a very
clear association with words) in order to get you to learn and advance. That is why
cartoons can work to a certain degree but can only get you so far in terms of complexity. |
|
|
No, that's why the process is so very slow.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
psy88 Senior Member United States Joined 5583 days ago 469 posts - 882 votes Studies: Spanish*, Japanese, Latin, French
| Message 36 of 52 15 December 2010 at 4:14am | IP Logged |
Random review wrote:
psy88 wrote:
ANK47 wrote:
Let's suppose that you're an American on vacation in Russia. You commit some crime and you're sentenced to 5 years solitary confinement in prison. All you have for entertainment is a TV with only Russian channels. You watch the TV around 4 hours a day every day for those 5 years. Do you know Russian by the end of your sentence? |
|
|
Okay, if you have read the postings on this site, you know that there are strong views about how bad certain language learning courses are considered to be by some of the posters.I can guarantee that you can pick what some people consider the worse possible courses, be they, Teach Yourself, Rosetta Stone, Michel Thomas,etc.etc., and any one of them would still be a thousand percent better approach than serving 5 years in a Russian prison :-)
|
|
|
Based on what evidence or personal experience can you make this claim...guarantee is a very strong word! And 1000% better? If you memorised the whole of Teach Yourself Spanish I wouldn't call your Spanish 1000% better than even the Spanish of somebody who learnt some survival Spanish from a phrasebook
B.t.w. Rosetta Stone? I hear it's bad. Teach Yourself (I have used this range)? It's mediocre, but not BAD bad. Michel Thomas, his method has its detractors, and some people don't like it, I don't think a serious person could call it "one of the worst possible courses", though. |
|
|
I was making a joke. What I was "guaranteeing " was that any program would be better- in my opinion - than 5 years in a Russian jail. The idea was that a Russian jail would be quite unpleasant and no matter how much you learned it would not be worth 5 years locked up. It was not meant as a literal comment about the value of the referenced programs, but rather the harshness of prison life.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
Aineko Triglot Senior Member New Zealand Joined 5440 days ago 238 posts - 442 votes Speaks: Serbian*, EnglishC2, Spanish Studies: Russian, Arabic (Written), Mandarin
| Message 37 of 52 15 December 2010 at 4:19am | IP Logged |
Random review wrote:
Aineko wrote:
[QUOTE=slucido]
Visual references need to be carefully structured and repeated many times (in a very
clear association with words) in order to get you to learn and advance. That is why
cartoons can work to a certain degree but can only get you so far in terms of
complexity. |
|
|
No, that's why the process is so very slow. |
|
|
No what? No they don't need to be structured and one can learn anything from any kind
of visual references? I really have hard time believing that. I can see this guy
learning Russian expressions to a beginner level, but getting advance, hardly. I can't
see how you can learn do discus the meaning of life, universe and everything just by
watching two guys sitting and discussing these things in a foreign language (which is
how a lot of Russian movies and TV serials look like :) ). And without being able to
express abstract concepts, you can't call your self advanced/fluent. Without any
reference, any analysis, any interaction, any possibility to record, play back,
compare...I just don't see it happening and won't believe it till something like that
actually happen.
2 persons have voted this message useful
|
slucido Bilingual Diglot Senior Member Spain https://goo.gl/126Yv Joined 6667 days ago 1296 posts - 1781 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan* Studies: English
| Message 38 of 52 15 December 2010 at 7:55am | IP Logged |
Aineko wrote:
Random review wrote:
Aineko wrote:
[QUOTE=slucido]
Visual references need to be carefully structured and repeated many times (in a very
clear association with words) in order to get you to learn and advance. That is why
cartoons can work to a certain degree but can only get you so far in terms of
complexity. |
|
|
No, that's why the process is so very slow. |
|
|
No what? No they don't need to be structured and one can learn anything from any kind
of visual references? I really have hard time believing that. I can see this guy
learning Russian expressions to a beginner level, but getting advance, hardly. I can't
see how you can learn do discus the meaning of life... |
|
|
Watching more than 7000 hours of random TV in any language, you will get almost 100% "listening" skills, NOT speaking skills.
Edited by slucido on 15 December 2010 at 7:55am
1 person has voted this message useful
|
Aineko Triglot Senior Member New Zealand Joined 5440 days ago 238 posts - 442 votes Speaks: Serbian*, EnglishC2, Spanish Studies: Russian, Arabic (Written), Mandarin
| Message 39 of 52 15 December 2010 at 8:09am | IP Logged |
slucido wrote:
Watching more than 7000 hours of random TV in any language, you will get almost 100%
"listening" skills, NOT speaking skills. |
|
|
What I wrote applies to 100% comprehension, as well. How are you going to understand
philosophical dialogue simply from watching a dialogue? Sorry, I just don't get it and
you seem so sure as if you had done the experiment yourself :). it's not all about
hours.
Some abstract terms don't have visual references you can see on TV. You can only get
them
through some kind of interaction (or a dictionary).
This whole thing reminds me of the charades game when you give someone a task to
explain
"The unbearable lightness of being" :D. Even with a direct interaction it is pretty
much undoable (unless everyone in the audience is strongly familiar with the book/movie
and
expects that one :) ).
Edited by Aineko on 15 December 2010 at 8:14am
1 person has voted this message useful
|
slucido Bilingual Diglot Senior Member Spain https://goo.gl/126Yv Joined 6667 days ago 1296 posts - 1781 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan* Studies: English
| Message 40 of 52 15 December 2010 at 8:43am | IP Logged |
Aineko wrote:
slucido wrote:
Watching more than 7000 hours of random TV in any language, you will get almost 100%
"listening" skills, NOT speaking skills. |
|
|
What I wrote applies to 100% comprehension, as well. How are you going to understand
philosophical dialogue simply from watching a dialogue? Sorry, I just don't get it and
you seem so sure as if you had done the experiment yourself :). it's not all about
hours.
Some abstract terms don't have visual references you can see on TV. You can only get
them
through some kind of interaction (or a dictionary).
This whole thing reminds me of the charades game when you give someone a task to
explain
"The unbearable lightness of being" :D. Even with a direct interaction it is pretty
much undoable (unless everyone in the audience is strongly familiar with the book/movie
and
expects that one :) ). |
|
|
If you can't understand philosophical issues in your own language, you won't be able to understand them in other languages. For example I don't understant some philosophical topics in ANY language. It doesn't matter the amount of input or the language or the amount interaction...I don't understand Hegel. It doesn't make any sense for me.
Edited by slucido on 15 December 2010 at 8:44am
1 person has voted this message useful
|