30 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4 Next >>
emk Diglot Moderator United States Joined 5532 days ago 2615 posts - 8806 votes Speaks: English*, FrenchB2 Studies: Spanish, Ancient Egyptian Personal Language Map
| Message 1 of 30 16 July 2012 at 4:36pm | IP Logged |
Dead languages aren't to everyone's taste, for all sorts of good reasons. There's
nobody to talk to (except in Latin and a few other liturgical languages), there are
usually no movies—in fact, you're pretty much limited to literature, letters and
religious texts.
But there are compensations, too. My university Latin classes reached the point where
we were translating lightly-edited Latin texts, and I learned two things that have
stuck with me ever since:
- No matter how many times I told myself otherwise, I used to suspect that people in
the distant past were, well, unsophisticated bumpkins. But in fact, a Roman like
Catullus was far more "modern" and cynical than 99% of people in the modern world. If
you imagine a Louis CK stand-up comedy routine in verse, you won't be far off. (And
this same Roman decadence and cynicism is the soil in which the early Christian faith
flourished, which explains a whole lot about St. Augustine, for one.)
- The political advice in emperor Trajan's letters was absolutely fascinating. He was
opposed to organized fire brigades, because (1) he hated having any organized
groups of citizens, and (2) he feared they would start burning stuff down to improve
their job security.
For a brief moment, translating Latin made a dead world feel real.
For those of you who study dead languages, what have you found most rewarding?
13 persons have voted this message useful
| Rykketid Diglot Groupie Italy Joined 4833 days ago 88 posts - 146 votes Speaks: Italian*, English Studies: French
| Message 2 of 30 16 July 2012 at 4:55pm | IP Logged |
A thing that I love about Latin is that it helps to understand a lot of words in many
languages (especially romance languages of course but not only).
For example, I had no idea what procrastinare meant in Italian, but I knew that
pro = forward and cras = tomorrow in Latin, therefore it was just
sufficient to put two and two together to understand the meaning of that word.
Another field where my (unluckily little) knowledge of Latin turned out to be quite
useful was when I had to have my law exams at uni. Since Roman law is the forefather of
our Modern judiciary system, a lot of expression are still in Latin especially in
textbooks, for instance ex tunc, ex nunc, icto oculis, ne bis in idem, ad
libitum etc etc
Edited by Rykketid on 16 July 2012 at 5:03pm
5 persons have voted this message useful
| Cavesa Triglot Senior Member Czech Republic Joined 5009 days ago 3277 posts - 6779 votes Speaks: Czech*, FrenchC2, EnglishC1 Studies: Spanish, German, Italian
| Message 3 of 30 16 July 2012 at 5:41pm | IP Logged |
Latin is still alive in some areas, not only the church. The medical terminology stands
on it, even though some languages changed the endings (like English). And there you can
see the beauty. A long Czech (and not only Czech) expression becomes a one or two word
Latin jewel. It is still a lingua franca, for exemple among the doctors. Sure, the
English is the number one today, but it stands on Latin, it is everywhere.
Ancient Greek is present in Latin or even by itself in the terminology. And it gave
roots to so many words we use, whether in science, philosophy, the art. It is fun to
see the connections and it is very healthy for our society to realize, at least from
time to time, our roots.
That is why I will surely return to Latin one day and why I may even try the Greek. And
even if I don't, I will always like to meet it anywhere else.
Ancient Egyptian is completely different. If I have the time one day, I would so love
to try it because I was so amazed by the culture and history when I was a child. This
language has a lot of popularity making advantages over other languages of that time
and region.
I wonder, do you know anyone who started to learn some ancient language because it
looked cool in the Stargate series? :-)
3 persons have voted this message useful
| lichtrausch Triglot Senior Member United States Joined 5960 days ago 525 posts - 1072 votes Speaks: English*, German, Japanese Studies: Korean, Mandarin
| Message 4 of 30 16 July 2012 at 6:00pm | IP Logged |
All the centuries that have passed since their glory days have lent them a certain
gravitas. I like that.
4 persons have voted this message useful
| daegga Tetraglot Senior Member Austria lang-8.com/553301 Joined 4521 days ago 1076 posts - 1792 votes Speaks: German*, EnglishC2, Swedish, Norwegian Studies: Danish, French, Finnish, Icelandic
| Message 5 of 30 16 July 2012 at 6:49pm | IP Logged |
The nice thing about dead languages is that nobody expects you to be able to speak it.
If I tell someone that I studied (modern) Icelandic, they usually want me to say this and that in Icelandic. But I can't really speak it as I only studied it to improve my Old Norse reading and grammar skills.
If I tell someone that I can read unnormalized Old Norwegian dialects, nobody asks questions other than "why?". With that I can cope ;)
2 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6597 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 6 of 30 16 July 2012 at 6:50pm | IP Logged |
I love how Latin is such a clear example of how languages grow, spread and develop.
2 persons have voted this message useful
| sipes23 Diglot Senior Member United States pluteopleno.com/wprs Joined 4870 days ago 134 posts - 235 votes Speaks: English*, Latin Studies: Spanish, Ancient Greek, Persian
| Message 7 of 30 16 July 2012 at 9:04pm | IP Logged |
emk wrote:
Dead languages aren't to everyone's taste, for all sorts of good reasons. There's nobody to talk to
(except in Latin and a few other liturgical languages), there are usually no movies—in fact, you're pretty much
limited to literature, letters and religious texts. |
|
|
All true, but since the texts are so old, they've had to survive some serious quality filters. Most of what we've got
from antiquity has had to survive what I think of as the "medieval filter." The work had to be good enough to get
copied out by hand for centuries. So it's almost a guarantee of quality (perhaps not always, but more often than
not).
emk wrote:
But in fact, a Roman like Catullus was far more "modern" and cynical than 99% of people in the
modern world. If you imagine a Louis CK stand-up comedy routine in verse, you won't be far off. |
|
|
For sure. Catullus is funny.
emk wrote:
- The political advice in emperor Trajan's letters was absolutely fascinating...
For a brief moment, translating Latin made a dead world feel real. |
|
|
This really is one of my favorite parts about the classics. In some ways, Greek is more effective at this than Latin,
but both can pull the trick. I also like the whole "first time" aspect. History? Herodotus did history first in the
West, and in an entertaining way to boot.
Old English, Latin and Greek are fun. If I were to go to Egypt, I'd love to work on some Egyptian. Sumerian might
be too much for me.
Knowing dead languages also allows me to gain a perspective that I otherwise couldn't get. I feel a continuity of
humanity stretching over the centuries that I am a part of. I can touch artifacts of antiquity. I am connected to
minds from the remote past. Does it get better than that?
15 persons have voted this message useful
| Hampie Diglot Senior Member Sweden Joined 6659 days ago 625 posts - 1009 votes Speaks: Swedish*, English Studies: Latin, German, Mandarin
| Message 8 of 30 17 July 2012 at 12:41am | IP Logged |
I tend to scold a lot at the ancient Sumerians... "Okay, you spent centuries developing a writing system this bad to
write this totally non-interesting stuff in a multitude of copies, oh, why!" was something I thought when I read the
tenth exactly the same looking building inscription embedded within a temple (they wrote on bricks, then used
them).
4 persons have voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 30 messages over 4 pages: 1 2 3 4 Next >>
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3438 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|