Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Bilingual-Dichotic Method

 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies Post Reply
12 messages over 2 pages: 1
Volte
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Switzerland
Joined 6430 days ago

4474 posts - 6726 votes 
Speaks: English*, Esperanto, German, Italian
Studies: French, Finnish, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 9 of 12
21 October 2010 at 7:30pm | IP Logged 
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Ari wrote:
I never understood the very common "since only studying vocab won't get you
fluent, you shouldn't study vocab out of context" attitude. What's the logic there?


There is certainly nothing wrong with learning vocabulary out of context, it's just that
when you compare this kind of subliminal learning to L-R which is a subliminal method of
sorts, L-R has the added bonus of learning through context and will give more of an
understanding of a word's usage in different situations while learning a word
subliminally with only one definition/comparative word in L1, could become misleading and
confusing.


L-R is not subliminal.

1 person has voted this message useful



jazzboy.bebop
Senior Member
Norway
norwegianthroughnove
Joined 5409 days ago

439 posts - 800 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Norwegian

 
 Message 10 of 12
21 October 2010 at 8:17pm | IP Logged 
Volte wrote:
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Ari wrote:
I never understood the very common
"since only studying vocab won't get you
fluent, you shouldn't study vocab out of context" attitude. What's the logic there?


There is certainly nothing wrong with learning vocabulary out of context, it's just
that
when you compare this kind of subliminal learning to L-R which is a subliminal method
of
sorts, L-R has the added bonus of learning through context and will give more of an
understanding of a word's usage in different situations while learning a word
subliminally with only one definition/comparative word in L1, could become misleading
and
confusing.


L-R is not subliminal.


True enough as a method on the whole. I have however found I have learned vocabulary
unconsciously as well as consciously using L-R and that suggests to me that it does
have an element of subliminal learning to it. I did say a subliminal method of sorts,
though in retrospect I think I have framed L-R in the wrong light.
1 person has voted this message useful



Volte
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Switzerland
Joined 6430 days ago

4474 posts - 6726 votes 
Speaks: English*, Esperanto, German, Italian
Studies: French, Finnish, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 11 of 12
22 October 2010 at 1:29am | IP Logged 
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Volte wrote:
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Ari wrote:
I never understood the very common
"since only studying vocab won't get you
fluent, you shouldn't study vocab out of context" attitude. What's the logic there?


There is certainly nothing wrong with learning vocabulary out of context, it's just
that
when you compare this kind of subliminal learning to L-R which is a subliminal method
of
sorts, L-R has the added bonus of learning through context and will give more of an
understanding of a word's usage in different situations while learning a word
subliminally with only one definition/comparative word in L1, could become misleading
and
confusing.


L-R is not subliminal.


True enough as a method on the whole. I have however found I have learned vocabulary
unconsciously as well as consciously using L-R and that suggests to me that it does
have an element of subliminal learning to it. I did say a subliminal method of sorts,
though in retrospect I think I have framed L-R in the wrong light.


All learning has some 'unconscious' element; humans are incapable of introspecting about exactly how it's happening: even with, say, flash cards and rote memorization, you're clearly trying to learn something, and know you're using flash cards and trying to memorize, but you don't know exactly how that actually works.

Learning via input (including via L-R) feels a bit fuzzier, but I wouldn't categorize it as 'more unconscious', and definitely not as 'subliminal' (trying to do L-R with audio too quiet to consciously hear, or a text that's just below your visual threshold is probably not the way to go).
2 persons have voted this message useful



jazzboy.bebop
Senior Member
Norway
norwegianthroughnove
Joined 5409 days ago

439 posts - 800 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Norwegian

 
 Message 12 of 12
22 October 2010 at 2:19pm | IP Logged 
Volte wrote:
jazzboy.bebop wrote:
Volte wrote:
jazzboy.bebop wrote:

Ari wrote:
I never understood the very common
"since only studying vocab won't get you
fluent, you shouldn't study vocab out of context" attitude. What's the logic there?


There is certainly nothing wrong with learning vocabulary out of context, it's just
that
when you compare this kind of subliminal learning to L-R which is a subliminal method
of
sorts, L-R has the added bonus of learning through context and will give more of an
understanding of a word's usage in different situations while learning a word
subliminally with only one definition/comparative word in L1, could become misleading
and
confusing.


L-R is not subliminal.


True enough as a method on the whole. I have however found I have learned vocabulary
unconsciously as well as consciously using L-R and that suggests to me that it does
have an element of subliminal learning to it. I did say a subliminal method of sorts,
though in retrospect I think I have framed L-R in the wrong light.


All learning has some 'unconscious' element; humans are incapable of introspecting
about exactly how it's happening: even with, say, flash cards and rote memorization,
you're clearly trying to learn something, and know you're using flash cards and trying
to memorize, but you don't know exactly how that actually works.

Learning via input (including via L-R) feels a bit fuzzier, but I wouldn't categorize
it as 'more unconscious', and definitely not as 'subliminal' (trying to do L-R with
audio too quiet to consciously hear, or a text that's just below your visual threshold
is probably not the way to go).


Good point, in that case it would definitely not be "subliminal" in the correct sense.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 12 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2344 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.