20 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3 Next >>
COF Senior Member United States Joined 5822 days ago 262 posts - 354 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 9 of 20 19 April 2012 at 11:49pm | IP Logged |
Khendon wrote:
The only people that seem hung up on the difference are the Americans and
Brits. ;)
Khen |
|
|
That's because British people hate to be lumped together with the Americans, and sometimes vice versa.
I know many Brits who find the "You speak English so you must be American" attitude quite tedious when they travel abroad.
And that point comes back to my point initially. The English language has become so culturally linked to America, that outside Europe particularly, anyone who speaks English is automatically assumed to be American.
Edited by COF on 19 April 2012 at 11:53pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| COF Senior Member United States Joined 5822 days ago 262 posts - 354 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 10 of 20 20 April 2012 at 12:07am | IP Logged |
nway wrote:
That is simply not true.
The UK is not just "another standard European country", and part of this is indeed due to the fact that it is one of a select group of four major native Anglophone countries in the world. Canada, Australia, and the UK lead many other countries of comparable or even larger economies in fields like citations in scientific journals, disseminating popular culture, and attracting immigrants and investment capital. British newspapers like The Economist are read far more widely than German or Japanese newspapers. Canadian music artists are likewise far more successful abroad than Italian or Brazilian artists. And so on and so forth.
|
|
|
Err, yes it is. In terms of science and technology the UK lags far behind Germany, and even France gives them a run for their money. What has the UK got that is even close to the aerospace giant that is Airbus? Hell, what heavy industry does the UK even have any more.
In fact, as far as I'm aware, the only cars manufactured in the UK are for Japanese companies like Toyota.
The only reason people read British newspapers and listen to British music is because they're in English and if you learn American English, you can usually understand British English.
The fact that the world language is English is a testament to the British Empire's once great power, but modern day Britain isn't a patch on what it once was, and people today learn English primarily so they can deal with the US, not the UK.
Quote:
Besides, this:
COF wrote:
In short, if you want to open up opportunities and the potential to "make it big", American English is the way to go. |
|
|
...rests on the completely incorrect assumption that British English couldn't be used in the US or couldn't be understood by speakers of American English. Maybe you haven't noticed, but folks like Simon Cowell, Pierce Morgan, Sharon Osbourne, Gordon Ramsay, Orlando Bloom, Sacha Baron Cohen, and Richard Branson are thriving quite handsomely in the US. |
|
|
Yes, because they speak English and Americans have a slightly odd facination with "Briddish" accents, not because they're exceptionally talented.
In fact, the most popular foreign Hollywood stars are people like Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jean-Claude Van Damme. Those two actors alone have achieved a level of stardom that I don't think any British actors in Hollywood can compare to.
However, outside the US, the majority of those people you've mentioned are almost completely unheard of. In many countries, the majority of celebrities the average person knows about are American celebrities because American popular culture is dominant.
Quote:
Yes, it offers fewer cultural exports than the largest cultural exporter in the world. Your point? Is anything less than the top spot completely insignificant? Consider how much the Eurozone was rocked by the sovereign debt crisis of tiny little Greece. |
|
|
I would dispute that the UK is the largest exporter of popular culture in Europe. There are plenty of musicians that have international popularity from non-Anglophone European countries, and also the UK film industry compared to the likes of the French and even Spanish film industry is relatively small, and it seems to me that low-budget Spanish films get more international recognition than low-budget British films.
In fact, it strikes me that the only British films that achieve any level of popularity outside the UK are those films that get Hollywood backing, which I feel is testament to my point that the UK relies on the US for its international prestige.
Quote:
Besides, few cultural exports? How about the most popular music artist of the year—Adele? Along with Amy Winehouse, Coldplay, Florence + the Machine, Franz Ferdinand, Leona Lewis, M.I.A., Mumford & Sons, Muse, Radiohead, Snow Patrol, Taio Cruz, the White Stripes, and countless more, not to mention all the immortal classics, from Radiohead to Queen to Black Sabbath to The Rolling Stones to a little group from Liverpool. |
|
|
There are plenty of highly popular groups and musicians from other European countries. Sweden, for example, punches well above its weight for a country with such a small population when it comes to music, and as of late film and literature.
Quote:
Add to that television shows like Top Gear and Doctor Who, as well as book series both new (Harry Potter) and old (The Lord of the Rings) that have inspired some of the most successful film series in cinematic history. Add to this the BBC, along with the fact that all the reporters on Al Jazeera English do, indeed, speak the British standard. |
|
|
So you can name one British TV show that has achieved any huge level of fame abroad, which is Top Gear? Dr. Who on the other hand is still relatively niche outside the UK, and while many people have heard of Top Gear, I think there are plenty of people who would have never seen the modern Dr. Who series.
The vast majority of TV shows the UK makes no one outside the UK even cares about. Even the big, well-funded ones that have a huge following within the UK. In fact, South American dramas sell better in some countries than British TV does.
Quote:
There are about 193 countries in the world. The UK is doing pretty damn well compared to most of them. |
|
|
Possibly, but only due to its colonial legacy and the fact it still speaks a language that is mutually intelligible with American English.
Edited by COF on 20 April 2012 at 12:16am
1 person has voted this message useful
| nway Senior Member United States youtube.com/user/Vic Joined 5406 days ago 574 posts - 1707 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean
| Message 11 of 20 20 April 2012 at 12:20am | IP Logged |
COF wrote:
That's because British people hate to be lumped together with the Americans, and sometimes vice versa.
I know many Brits who find the "You speak English so you must be American" attitude quite tedious when they travel abroad.
And that point comes back to my point initially. The English language has become so culturally linked to America, that outside Europe particularly, anyone who speaks English is automatically assumed to be American. |
|
|
It's a simple matter of probability. If you see a guy speaking French, it's natural to assume he's French, even though he may be Swiss, Belgian, Québécois, etc. If you see a guy speaking a Chinese language, it's natural to assume he's from China or Taiwan, even though he may be from Malaysia, Singapore, or heck, even Australia or Canada.
I don't think the "you speak ___ language so I'm assuming you're probably from the country that has the most speakers of ___ language" phenomenon is unique to English.
Edited by nway on 20 April 2012 at 12:56am
4 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6588 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 12 of 20 20 April 2012 at 12:21am | IP Logged |
COF wrote:
people today learn English primarily so they can deal with the US, not the UK. |
|
|
people learn English so they can deal with most of the world, including plenty of non-native speakers.
I think the differences are just smaller from learners' point of view than from native speakers'. Unless one speaks a weird dialect, they're probably equally easy to understand. Far easier than Brazilian Portuguese is if you've been learning the European version.
Random but I hate those ads that say: You won a Green card!!! Congratulations!
Not everyone in the world wants to live in the USA. Not everyone would even include it in the top 5 places they want to visit. (for me it would be only in the top 10)
5 persons have voted this message useful
| frenkeld Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 6934 days ago 2042 posts - 2719 votes Speaks: Russian*, English Studies: German
| Message 13 of 20 20 April 2012 at 12:39am | IP Logged |
COF wrote:
Quote:
There are about 193 countries in the world. The UK is doing pretty damn well compared to most of them. |
|
|
Possibly, but only due to its colonial legacy and the fact it still speaks a language that is mutually intelligible with American English. |
|
|
Huh? It just may be the other way around, whereby the US has done as well as it has because it was originally settled by the British. A quick look at the Western Hemisphere will reveal that it's not the kind of location that automatically implies prosperity.
Generally speaking, Western Europe is where modern science and mathematics were invented, where the industrial revolution began and where some of the intellectual thought that went into the US Constitution had evolved. Any number of countries in Western Europe with or without colonial past have done pretty well.
Edited by frenkeld on 20 April 2012 at 12:58am
4 persons have voted this message useful
| nway Senior Member United States youtube.com/user/Vic Joined 5406 days ago 574 posts - 1707 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean
| Message 14 of 20 20 April 2012 at 12:53am | IP Logged |
COF, it seem like you've got a major chip on your shoulder against the British.
I, too, sometimes get very frustrated with some arrogant Brits I encounter (online), but this forum really isn't the place to vent that type of frustration. Not to mention, you're contributing to the "ugly American" stereotype that I—as an American—*really* don't appreciate.
Honestly, it seems like you're forgetting that Britain has 20% the population of the US. At that ratio, I'd say Britain has been doing pretty damn well.
And seriously...
Comparing Britain unfavorably to Sweden with respect to musical influence?
No disrespect to Sweden, but let's be realistic here:
The Beatles - 249 million certified units sold
Elton John - 153 million
Led Zeppelin - 133.4 million
Pink Floyd - 110.2 million
Queen - 90 million
The Rolling Stones - 89.5 million
Phil Collins - 82.4 million
Rod Stewart - 67.8 million
Bee Gees - 63.2 million
Dire Straits - 42.7 million
George Michael - 41.4 million
Coldplay - 39.6 million
Genesis - 38.6 million
The Police - 35.2 million
Sade - 34.5 million
Oasis - 28.7 million
Depeche Mode - 23.8 million
The Who - 23.2 million
David Bowie - 22.6 million
Paul McCartney - 22.2 million
-vs-
ABBA - 54.5 million
Ace of Base - 22.2 million
Roxette - 15.3 million
Do I really need to say more?
.
Edited by nway on 20 April 2012 at 1:00am
5 persons have voted this message useful
| tarvos Super Polyglot Winner TAC 2012 Senior Member China likeapolyglot.wordpr Joined 4698 days ago 5310 posts - 9399 votes Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish
| Message 15 of 20 20 April 2012 at 1:00am | IP Logged |
Yeah, you need to also compare it with regards to size of the population :)
1 person has voted this message useful
| Khendon Newbie United KingdomRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 4600 days ago 13 posts - 31 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Japanese
| Message 16 of 20 20 April 2012 at 8:24am | IP Logged |
COF wrote:
Khendon wrote:
The only people that seem hung up on the difference are the Americans
and
Brits. ;)
Khen |
|
|
That's because British people hate to be lumped together with the Americans, and sometimes vice versa.
I know many Brits who find the "You speak English so you must be American" attitude quite tedious when
they travel abroad.
And that point comes back to my point initially. The English language has become so culturally linked to
America, that outside Europe particularly, anyone who speaks English is automatically assumed to be
American. |
|
|
In my personal experience, and I do travel extensively, that is not the case.
Most people you meet just throw a guess out there when they hear your accent. I've had people ask me if I'm
American, Australian, British, English, Scottish.... Some guess right, some guess wrong, some don't assume
and they just ask.
I have never encountered the, "you speak English, you must be American".
Not that I would even find it offensive if someone did. It's pretty irrelevant, there are a lot of you guys, I work
in a US dominated industry, and not many Brits travel to some of the places I end up. Hah
Whilst I don't agree with everything COF says, he is right in some respects, we are a falling nation
economically, industrially. A welfare state, economy based on service industry, failing industry, dwindling
natural resources, little investment in securing domestic power generation, failing agriculture. A lot of our
political power is in fact due to our close relationship with the US, our role in the UN and a legacy of our
empire.
No point getting moody about the truth ;).
(mind you, you guys might be heading the same way, massive national debt, obamas health care program,
imports greater than exports etc, watch out!)
Regards
Khen
2 persons have voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3398 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|