Most difficult Indo-European language? (General discussion) Language Learning Forum

Most difficult Indo-European language?
Tags: Indo-European Languages \| Difficulty
Share with: Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon
Language Learning Forum : General discussion

21 messages over 3 pages: 1 2 3

Medulin
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Croatia
Joined 4668 days ago
1199 posts - 2192 votes

Speaks: Croatian*, English, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Norwegian, Hindi, Nepali

Message 17 of 21

27 June 2012 at 8:25pm | IP Logged

I would say Bengali
1 person has voted this message useful

BartoG
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
confession
Joined 5447 days ago
292 posts - 818 votes

Speaks: English*, French
Studies: Italian, Spanish, Latin, Uzbek

Message 18 of 21

09 July 2012 at 3:09am | IP Logged

To read Hittite as it was first written down, you need to know neo-Assyrian script and enough Sumerian and Babylonian to recognize when it has substituted an ideogram from one of these for actual Hittite sounds. Once you're done with that, you can start in on the actual language, including a nice, complicated case system and a phonology that underlies the belief of some Indoeuropeanists that PIE had so-called laryngeals when no documented IE language has them. I wouldn't have mentioned it since it's so long dead, but since Greek and Sanskrit have come up, I thought it worth a mention.
1 person has voted this message useful

Hampie
Diglot
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 6659 days ago
625 posts - 1009 votes

Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: Latin, German, Mandarin

Message 19 of 21

09 July 2012 at 11:02am | IP Logged

BartoG wrote:

To read Hittite as it was first written down, you need to know neo-Assyrian script and enough
Sumerian and Babylonian to recognize when it has substituted an ideogram from one of these for actual Hittite
sounds. Once you're done with that, you can start in on the actual language, including a nice, complicated case
system and a phonology that underlies the belief of some Indoeuropeanists that PIE had so-called laryngeals when
no documented IE language has them. I wouldn't have mentioned it since it's so long dead, but since Greek and
Sanskrit have come up, I thought it worth a mention.

Though most comparative linguists usually get the Hittite in already-made transcription, them lazy asses ;).
3 persons have voted this message useful

languagenerd09
Triglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
youtube.com/user/Lan
Joined 5100 days ago
174 posts - 267 votes

Speaks: English*, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Mandarin, Japanese, Thai

Message 20 of 21

09 July 2012 at 4:09pm | IP Logged

I would say Hungarian?
1 person has voted this message useful

Lucky Charms
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
lapacifica.net
Joined 6949 days ago
752 posts - 1711 votes

Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: German, Spanish

Message 21 of 21

09 July 2012 at 5:43pm | IP Logged

languagenerd09 wrote:

I would say Hungarian?

Hungarian is an Uralic language (along with Finnish and Estonian), not Indo-European.

Edited by Lucky Charms on 09 July 2012 at 5:44pm

6 persons have voted this message useful

This discussion contains 21 messages over 3 pages: << Prev 1 2 3

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register

Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This page was generated in 0.6870 seconds.