Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Resources for Lowland Scots?

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
69 messages over 9 pages: 1 24 5 6 7 ... 3 ... 8 9 Next >>
Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6012 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 17 of 69
18 July 2010 at 11:14pm | IP Logged 
Tyr wrote:
We should all be proud of our dialects and old ways of speech should be recorded whether it be Scots, Tyke, Norfolk, Geordie or whatever. To say one set of dialects are more special and different than the others just because they lie north of an arbitrary historical line however...Its just wrong.

The historical origin of Scots has to be tied to the Danelaw, when Anglo-Saxon was influenced by the variant of Old Norse spoken by the Danish vikings. While Middle English was being formed in the south by the influence of Norman French on Anglo-Saxon, the kingdom of Mercia was being faught over by Scotland and England.

The bit that we got was massively less affected by Norman in vocabulary, grammar and phraseology than what was spoken in the south of England. The bit of Mercia that England got was more affected by the Normans than Scots, but not as much as southern English.

If we relabel Middle Scots as Anglo-Danish and Middle (southern) English as Anglo-Norman, we can see that the northeast of England is in a transitional place -- it is a dialect continuum between the Anglo-Danish and Anglo-Norman languages.

In fact, it's linguistically fair to describe Geordie as a dialect of Scots -- this definition is only rejected because of the association of the names of both languages (English and Scots) with a particular country. The arbitrary line that you mention doesn't unfairly favour Border Scots, but it unfairly disfavours Geordie by describing it as something it is not.

The same situation occurs with regard to Gallician and Portuguese. Standard Portuguese is based on the southern dialect spoken in and around the capital and there is a strong dialectal different between the north and south. In fact, the northern dialects in Portugal bear a closer resemblance to Galician than Standard Portuguese. This again does not prove that Galician is just a Portuguese dialect, but that the linguistic border has been badly defined for political purposes.

If the existence of a dialect continuum between two languages proved them to be the same language, then the continuum between Portuguese and Galician, Galician and Asturian, Asturian through Cantabrian into Castillian, Castillian through to Catalan, Catalan to Occitan thence to French, and Occitan to Genovese and through the Italian dialects right down to Sicily would "prove" that 30% of Europe speaks a single Romance language, 30% a single Germanic language and 30% a single Slavic language.
1 person has voted this message useful



johntm93
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5328 days ago

587 posts - 746 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish

 
 Message 18 of 69
19 July 2010 at 4:23am | IP Logged 
Tyr wrote:

You live two miles south however just over the English border- you're an idiot who can't speak proper English.
So if you talk a certain way in one place, it's a language, but if you talk the same way a couple of miles away, you're an idiot who can't speak another language properly?
1 person has voted this message useful





newyorkeric
Diglot
Moderator
Singapore
Joined 6380 days ago

1598 posts - 2174 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: Mandarin, Malay
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 19 of 69
19 July 2010 at 4:52am | IP Logged 
johntm93 wrote:
Tyr wrote:

You live two miles south however just over the English border- you're an idiot who can't speak proper English.
So if you talk a certain way in one place, it's a language, but if you talk the same way a couple of miles away, you're an idiot who can't speak another language properly?


Tyr was using this as an example of a particular viewpoint that he/she does not agree with.
1 person has voted this message useful



johntm93
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5328 days ago

587 posts - 746 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish

 
 Message 20 of 69
19 July 2010 at 5:04am | IP Logged 
newyorkeric wrote:
johntm93 wrote:
Tyr wrote:

You live two miles south however just over the English border- you're an idiot who can't speak proper English.
So if you talk a certain way in one place, it's a language, but if you talk the same way a couple of miles away, you're an idiot who can't speak another language properly?


Tyr was using this as an example of a particular viewpoint that he/she does not agree with.
Yes, but I didn't understand how it is a language in one place but poor English a few miles away...maybe if they had a mixture of English and Scots, I can somewhat see his viewpoint. After all, I am sort of on the fence on the dialect/language thing for Scots anyway, I won't make up my mind until I learn more about linguistics. I was just pointing out how absurd that example sounded to me.
1 person has voted this message useful





newyorkeric
Diglot
Moderator
Singapore
Joined 6380 days ago

1598 posts - 2174 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian
Studies: Mandarin, Malay
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 21 of 69
19 July 2010 at 5:08am | IP Logged 
johntm93 wrote:
I was just pointing out how absurd that example sounded to me.


That's Tyr's point. That two people that speak the same way are viewed differently simply because they live on different sides of a border.
3 persons have voted this message useful



johntm93
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5328 days ago

587 posts - 746 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish

 
 Message 22 of 69
19 July 2010 at 5:59am | IP Logged 
newyorkeric wrote:
johntm93 wrote:
I was just pointing out how absurd that example sounded to me.


That's Tyr's point. That two people that speak the same way are viewed differently simply because they live on different sides of a border.
Ahh, I was thinking he was the one stating that the person would be an idiot, not an example. Forgive me, my brain hasn't been working today.
1 person has voted this message useful



JimC
Senior Member
United Kingdom
tinyurl.com/aberdeen
Joined 5548 days ago

199 posts - 317 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 23 of 69
19 July 2010 at 2:26pm | IP Logged 
Fit rare, noo that a ken that Scots is considert te be a tongue o it's ain oan here, av jist became bilingual!

A'though am a city loon in Aiberdeen, a can spik the Doric lik the country chiels.

Funny though av niver wrote it doon afore

Jim

Edited by JimC on 19 July 2010 at 2:28pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6012 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 24 of 69
19 July 2010 at 4:47pm | IP Logged 
JimC wrote:
Fit rare, noo that a ken that Scots is considert te be a tongue o it's ain oan here, av jist became bilingual!

A'though am a city loon in Aiberdeen, a can spik the Doric lik the country chiels.

Funny though av niver wrote it doon afore

Jim

Dae ye say "av" in Doric? Ah thocht it wis "hae" -- "ah hae". That's hou we speak doun in the Central Belt, anyhou....


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 69 messages over 9 pages: << Prev 1 24 5 6 7 8 9  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5703 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.