Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Urdu (Hindi, Hindustani) overview

  Tags: Urdu | Hindi
 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
34 messages over 5 pages: 1 24 5  Next >>
Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6769 days ago

2282 posts - 2814 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

 
 Message 17 of 34
26 September 2007 at 3:06am | IP Logged 
Perhaps Xtremelingo is referring to the sloping Nastaleeq style of writing Arabic, which is the preferred style for Urdu and merely calligraphic for the other languages that use the Arabic alphabet.
1 person has voted this message useful



xtremelingo
Trilingual Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 6288 days ago

398 posts - 515 votes 
Speaks: English*, Hindi*, Punjabi*
Studies: German, French, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 18 of 34
02 October 2007 at 5:22pm | IP Logged 
Captain,

Yes, the sloping style of arabic. It is very calligraphic.

1 person has voted this message useful



HTale
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6379 days ago

164 posts - 167 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written)*
Studies: French

 
 Message 19 of 34
13 October 2007 at 12:42pm | IP Logged 
sumabeast wrote:
xtremelingo wrote:
Personally, I think Urdu's written form looks better than Arabic.


Don't mean to argue, but I'd disagree with this.
Urdu script just looks too cluttered with all the extra markings above and below the letters.


I think both look beautiful when in the hands of a calligrapher. Although, I find that the normal urdu script looks more exotic, and the Arabic one just looks 'plain' (much like the roman script to much of us).
1 person has voted this message useful



Karakorum
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6570 days ago

201 posts - 232 votes 
Speaks: English*, Arabic (Written)*
Studies: French, German

 
 Message 20 of 34
13 October 2007 at 1:57pm | IP Logged 
HTale wrote:
sumabeast wrote:
xtremelingo wrote:
Personally, I think Urdu's written form looks better than Arabic.


Don't mean to argue, but I'd disagree with this.
Urdu script just looks too cluttered with all the extra markings above and below the letters.


I think both look beautiful when in the hands of a calligrapher. Although, I find that the normal urdu script looks more exotic, and the Arabic one just looks 'plain' (much like the roman script to much of us).


Yeah, exactly. Printed Arabic just looks like plain writing, while Urdu has a more calligraphic style. I don't know how handwritten Urdu or Persian look like, but I do know that handwritten Arabic is often ugly. I blame prolific use of Riq'a. People who use Naskh end up writing very nicely and legibly, but I get the impression that people view Riq'a as the font for super busy adults who don't have time to waste on small things. So you just end up staring at one long line with a bunch of strokes trying figure out if it's supposed to be a word or a doodle of a boy holding an ice cream cone.
2 persons have voted this message useful



mrhenrik
Triglot
Moderator
Norway
Joined 6080 days ago

482 posts - 658 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 22 of 34
30 July 2010 at 3:56am | IP Logged 
I do realise this thread is older than all the hills, but I had to reply to this part
of Prof. Arguelles post:
Quote:

Phonetically, however, there is a serious difficulty, namely the �retroflex� series
of consonants, made by touching the tip of your tongue to the top center of your mouth
instead of your alveolar ridge in order to make sounds like d�s, t�s, and r�s. There
is nothing parallel that I know of in any European language�or indeed in any other
non-Indic languages.


I might be stumbling a bit here as I have no knowledge of grammatical terms, but I
believe this sound is found in Norwegian as well - as the only European language. It
occurs in "-rt-" parts of words; instead of pronouncing both of the letters
individually, they're moulded together into a sound which is indeed made by touching
the tip of your tongue to the top center of your mouth.

Examples of words:
Vert - host
Ert - pea
Svart - black
Hardt - hard

I've heard from before at least, that the only other "big" language (if one can use
that word of Norwegian) using this sound is Hindi.
2 persons have voted this message useful



lynxrunner
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United States
crittercryptics.com
Joined 5923 days ago

361 posts - 461 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish*, French
Studies: Russian, Swedish, Haitian Creole

 
 Message 23 of 34
30 July 2010 at 4:41am | IP Logged 
The same thing occurs in Swedish, too! "rt" becomes a retroflex t and it happens for some
other r + consonant combinations as well. Does it help Swedish/Norwegian speakers with
Hindi?
1 person has voted this message useful



sunny
Groupie
United States
Joined 6249 days ago

98 posts - 128 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Russian, Welsh, French

 
 Message 24 of 34
31 July 2010 at 4:39pm | IP Logged 
Thank you for this very enlightening post and subsequent conversation.

My daughter had been wanting to continue her study of Urdu, but we found very little
material on the internet to do so. (We are not well financed and rely heavily on free
resources.) Armed with the knowledge that there are sufficient materials for Hindi which
will suffice, she can perhaps resume her studies with Hindi.

Thank you.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 34 messages over 5 pages: << Prev 1 24 5  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 5.9219 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.